Resolution of TxDOT Comments and Objections Sample Clauses

The 'Resolution of TxDOT Comments and Objections' clause establishes a process for addressing and resolving any feedback, concerns, or objections raised by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) regarding project documents, plans, or activities. Typically, this clause outlines the steps the contractor or project party must take to respond to TxDOT's comments, such as revising documents, providing additional information, or engaging in discussions to reach an agreement. Its core practical function is to ensure that all TxDOT requirements and standards are met before project work proceeds, thereby preventing misunderstandings and ensuring regulatory compliance.
Resolution of TxDOT Comments and Objections. 3.1.7.1. If the Submittal is one not governed by Section 3.1.3, TxDOT’s exception, objection, rejection or disapproval shall be deemed reasonable, valid and binding if and only if based on any of the following grounds: (a) The Submittal or subject provision thereof fails to comply with any applicable covenant, condition, requirement, term or provision of the Contract Documents or Project Management Plan and component plans thereunder; (b) The Submittal or subject provision thereof is not to a standard equal to or better than the requirements of Good Industry Practice; (c) DB Contractor has not provided all content or information required with respect to the Submittal or subject provisions thereof, provided that TxDOT assumes no duty, obligation or liability regarding completeness or correctness of any Submittal, including a Submittal that is to be delivered to another Governmental Entity as a proposed Governmental Approval, or in order to obtain, modify, amend, supplement, renew, extend, waive or carry out a Governmental Approval; (d) Adoption of the Submittal or subject provision thereof, or of any proposed course of action thereunder, would result in a conflict with or violation of any Law or Governmental Approval; or (e) In the case of a Submittal that is to be delivered to another Governmental Entity as a proposed Governmental Approval, or in order to obtain, modify, amend, supplement, renew, extend, waive or carry out a Governmental Approval, it proposes commitments, requirements, actions, terms or conditions that are not usual and customary arrangements that TxDOT offers or accepts for addressing similar circumstances affecting its own projects. 3.1.7.2. DB Contractor shall respond to all of TxDOT’s comments and objections to a Submittal and make modifications to the Submittal as necessary to fully reflect and resolve all such comments and objections, in accordance with the review processes set forth in this Section 3.1. DB Contractor acknowledges that TxDOT may provide comments and objections which reflect concerns regarding interpretation or preferences of the commenter or which otherwise do not directly relate to grounds set forth in Section 3.1. 7.1. DB Contractor agrees to undertake reasonable efforts to accommodate or otherwise resolve any such comments or objections through the review processes described in this Section 3.1. However, if the Submittal is not governed by Section 3.1.3, the foregoing shall in no way be deemed to obligate DB Contr...
Resolution of TxDOT Comments and Objections. (a) Developer shall respond to, and make modifications to the Submittal as necessary to fully reflect and resolve, all comments and objections to a Submittal by TxDOT and the Independent Engineer that are based on the following grounds: (i) the Submittal fails to comply with any applicable provision of the CDA Documents or Project Management Plan and component plans thereunder; (ii) the Submittal is not to a standard equal to or better than the requirements of Good Industry Practice; (iii) Developer has not provided all required information; (iv) implementation of the Submittal would result in a conflict with or violation of any Law or Governmental Approval; or (v) the Submittal requires or proposes a commitment, requirements, action, term or condition in connection with a Governmental Approval that is not the usual and customary arrangement offered or accepted by TxDOT for addressing similar circumstances affecting its own projects. The foregoing does not obligate Developer to incorporate any comments or resolve objections that would render the Submittal erroneous, defective or less than Good Industry Practice, except pursuant to a TxDOT Change. (b) TxDOT or the Independent Engineer may also provide comments and objections that reflect concerns regarding interpretation or preferences of the commenter or that otherwise do not directly relate to grounds set forth in Section 8.1.6(a). Developer shall use reasonable efforts to accommodate or otherwise resolve any such comments or objections. However, unless the Submittal is subject to approval or disapproval by TxDOT in its discretion, the foregoing does not obligate Developer to incorporate any comments or resolve objections that are not reasonable and would result in a delay to a Critical Path on the Project Schedule, in an increase in Developer’s costs or a decrease in Toll Revenues, except pursuant to a TxDOT Change. (c) If Developer does not accommodate or otherwise resolve any comment or objection, Developer shall deliver to TxDOT, within 30 days after receipt of the comment or objection, an explanation why modifications based on such comment or objection are not required, including the facts, analyses and reasons that support the conclusion. Developer’s failure to provide such explanation with such 30-day period shall constitute Developer’s agreement to make all changes necessary to accommodate or resolve the comment or objection and Developer’s full acceptance of all responsibility for such changes wi...
Resolution of TxDOT Comments and Objections. 3.1.7.1. If the Submittal is one not governed by Section 3.1.3, ▇▇▇▇▇’s exception, objection, rejection or disapproval shall be deemed reasonable, valid and binding if and only if based on any of the following grounds: (a) The Submittal or subject provision thereof fails to comply with any applicable covenant, condition, requirement, term or provision of the Contract Documents or Project Management Plan and component plans thereunder; (b) The Submittal or subject provision thereof is not to a standard equal to or better than the requirements of Good Industry Practice; (c) DB Contractor has not provided all content or information required with respect to the Submittal or subject provisions thereof, provided that TxDOT assumes no duty, obligation or liability regarding completeness or correctness of any Submittal, including a Submittal that is to be delivered to another Governmental Entity as a proposed Governmental Approval, or in order to obtain, modify, amend, supplement, renew, extend, waive or carry out a Governmental Approval; (d) Adoption of the Submittal or subject provision thereof, or of any proposed course of action thereunder, would result in a conflict with or violation of any Law or Governmental Approval; or (e) In the case of a Submittal that is to be delivered to another Governmental Entity as a proposed Governmental Approval, or in order to obtain, modify, Texas Department of Transportation US 77 Upgrade from Kingsville to Driscoll Project 17 Final RFP Addendum 1 Design-Build Agreement September 5October 3, 2012 amend, supplement, renew, extend, waive or carry out a Governmental Approval, it proposes commitments, requirements, actions, terms or conditions that are not usual and customary arrangements that TxDOT offers or accepts for addressing similar circumstances affecting its own projects. 3.1.7.2. DB Contractor shall respond to all of TxDOT’s comments and objections to a Submittal and make modifications to the Submittal as necessary to fully reflect and resolve all such comments and objections, in accordance with the review processes set forth in this Section 3.1. DB Contractor acknowledges that TxDOT may provide comments and objections which reflect concerns regarding interpretation or preferences of the commenter or which otherwise do not directly relate to grounds set forth in Section 3.1. 7.1. DB Contractor agrees to undertake reasonable efforts to accommodate or otherwise resolve any such comments or objections through the review pr...

Related to Resolution of TxDOT Comments and Objections

  • Recognition of the U.S. Special Resolution Regimes (a) In the event that any Underwriter that is a Covered Entity becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, the transfer from such Underwriter of this Agreement, and any interest and obligation in or under this Agreement, will be effective to the same extent as the transfer would be effective under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement, and any such interest and obligation, were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States. (b) In the event that any Underwriter that is a Covered Entity or a BHC Act Affiliate of such Underwriter becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, Default Rights under this Agreement that may be exercised against such Underwriter are permitted to be exercised to no greater extent than such Default Rights could be exercised under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States.

  • Resolution of Disputes Any dispute or disagreement which may arise under, or as a result of, or in any way related to, the interpretation, construction or application of this Agreement shall be determined by the Committee. Any determination made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive on the Grantee and the Company for all purposes.

  • Resolution of Disagreements Disputes arising under this Agreement will be resolved informally by discussions between Agency Points of Contact, or other officials designated by each agency.

  • Informal Resolution of Disputes 10.5.1 Upon receipt by one Party of notice of a dispute by the other Party pursuant to Section 10.3 or Section 10.4.5, each Party will appoint a knowledgeable, responsible representative to meet and negotiate in good faith to resolve any dispute arising under this Agreement. The location, form, frequency, duration, and conclusion of these discussions will be left to the discretion of the representatives. Upon agreement, the representatives may utilize other alternative Dispute Resolution procedures such as mediation to assist in the negotiations. Discussions and the correspondence among the representatives for purposes of settlement are exempt from discovery and production and will not be admissible in the arbitration described below or in any lawsuit without the concurrence of both Parties. Documents identified in or provided with such communications that were not prepared for purposes of the negotiations are not so exempted, and, if otherwise admissible, may be admitted in evidence in the arbitration or lawsuit.

  • Resolution of Differences Differences between the Employer and the Union as to the interpretation or application of the provisions of the Trust Agreement relating to employee benefits shall not be subject to the grievance or arbitration procedure established in any collective bargaining agreement. All such differences shall be resolved in the manner specified in the Trust Agreement.