Review scope and methodology Sample Clauses

Review scope and methodology. TDEC will designate a representative to serve on the review team. Project file reviews will be conducted to determine if the State is timely and accurately verifying AVS ownership and control information for the contractors/subcontractors selected. OSMRE AVS System Advisory Memoranda will be referenced in conducting the AVS oversight review.
View Source
Review scope and methodology. Review of Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) drawdowns and disbursements of OSMRE grant funding will be conducted to determine whether the drawdowns and disbursements of Federal funds are in conformity with the Grants Management Common Rule codified by the U.S. Department of the Interior at 43 CFR Part 12, Subpart C; the OSMRE Federal Assistance Manual Chapter 5-55; and the following criteria:  Drawdowns are limited to the minimum amount needed and timed to correspond with the actual, immediate cash requirements of TDEC in order to carry out the approved Tennessee abandoned mine land (AML) program and cooperative agreements.  Drawdown timing and amounts are as close as administratively feasible to actual disbursement by TDEC for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs.  Drawdowns are properly accounted for and in accordance with Federal grant and cooperative agreement funding requirements. Beginning Date: 10/01/2017 Completion Date: 09/30/2018‌
View Source
Review scope and methodology. TDEC will designate a representative or representatives to participate in the review and report development. TDEC will provide OSMRE with the subject AML non-emergency construction project site population at the start of the review. TDEC will also notify OSMRE when any AML site construction starts during the review period and will provide the estimated construction completion timeframe. Project site files and respective grant files will be reviewed, TDEC personnel interviewed, and joint OSMRE/TDEC site visits scheduled and conducted for the sampled project sites. The goal of these measures is to evaluate TDEC’s performance in managing AML non-emergency construction and on-the-ground AML hazard abatement success. The results of each sampled project site visit will be documented in an OSMRE report. Sampled project file and respective grant file documents considered for review will include: • Correspondence generated during document development and interagency or intergovernmental consultation processes which may require specific permit conditions or mitigation measures for the construction project site. • Environmental documents developed for the project site (i.e. environmental assessments, categorical exclusions, and findings of no significant impact). • Engineered project site designs. • Project site construction contracts, technical specifications, and invoices. • Written procedures used by TDEC in AML construction management. • TDEC inspection reports. • Construction grant performance reports, and • Previous OSMRE site visit reports. The review will determine whether TDEC AML non-emergency contract monitoring and construction management effectively ensured: • Project construction was carried out or is being carried out in accordance with contract terms and technical specifications. • Compliance with any specific permit conditions or mitigation measures required pursuant to the interagency and intergovernmental NEPA consultation process, and • Construction achieved or is progressing toward achieving the project design goals to effectively reclaim the AML features involved. Beginning date: 10/01/2017 Completion date: 09/30/2018 OSMRE FY 2018 OVERSIGHT WORK PLAN FOR TENNESSEE ENHANCEMENT AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW‌‌‌
View Source

Related to Review scope and methodology

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Benchmarking The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.