RIGHT TO ASSURANCE Sample Clauses
The Right to Assurance clause allows one party in a contract to demand confirmation from the other party that they will fulfill their contractual obligations, especially if there are reasonable grounds to doubt their performance. In practice, this means that if one party suspects the other may not deliver as promised—such as failing to make payments or provide goods—they can formally request written assurance of performance. If the requested assurance is not provided within a specified timeframe, the concerned party may treat the contract as breached. This clause serves to protect parties from uncertainty and potential non-performance by providing a mechanism to address doubts and clarify intentions before a breach occurs.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 13 times
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever one party to the Contract in good faith has reason to question the other party’s intent to perform, demand may be made to the other party for written assurance of the intent to perform. In the event that no assurance is given within the time specified after demand is made, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation of the Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever one party to this contract in good faith has reason to question the other party's intent to perform he may demand that the other party give written assurance of his intent to perform. In the event that a demand is made and no assurance is given within five (5) days, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation of the contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever the District in good faith has reason to question the Vendor's intent to perform, the District may demand that the Vendor give written assurance of its intent to perform. In the event that a demand is made and no assurance is given within five business (5) days, the District may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation of the Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the AZDOHS in good faith has reason to believe that the Subrecipient does not intend to, or is unable to perform or continue performing under this Agreement, the AZDOHS may demand in writing that the Subrecipient give a written assurance of intent and ability to perform. If the Subrecipient fails to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand, the AZDOHS at its option may terminate this Agreement.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the State in good faith has reason to believe that the Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or continue performing under this Contract, the Procurement Officer may demand in writing that the Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by the Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of Days specified in the demand may, at the State’s option, be the basis for terminating the Contract under the Uniform Terms and Conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by the contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever a party to this Agreement in good faith has reason to question another party’s intent to perform, the party may demand that the other party give a written assurance of its intent to perform. In the event that a demand is made and no written assurance is given within five (5) days, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation or Event of Default of this Agreement.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the Department, in good faith, has reason to believe that the Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or has refused to perform or continue performing all material obligations under this Contract, the Department may demand in writing that the Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand (not less than five business days) may, at the Department’s option, be the basis for terminating this Contract under the terms and conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by this Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the School District in good faith has reason to believe that the Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or continue performing the Contract, the Procurement Officer may demand in writing that the Contractor give a written assurance of intent or ability to perform. Failure by the Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand may, at the School District’s option, be the basis for terminating the Contract under the Uniform General Terms and Conditions.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If DSHS, in good faith, has reason to believe that Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or has refused to perform or continue performing all material obligations under this Agreement, DSHS may demand in writing that Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand (in no event less than five business days) may, at DSHS's option, be the basis for terminating this Agreement under the terms and conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by this Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If State, in good faith, has reason to believe that Contractor does not intend to, is unable to, or has refused to perform or continue performing all material obligations under these Terms and Conditions, State may demand in writing that Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Contractor’s failure to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand (in no event less than five business days) may, at State's option, be the basis for termination and pursuing the rights and remedies available to State.