Common use of SCHEDULING ORDER Clause in Contracts

SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Trustmark, to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with Trustmark, to Enter the Bar Order, and to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment and Bar Order (the “Motion”) of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (the “Receiver”), as Receiver for the Receivership Estate in SEC ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ International Bank, Ltd., No. 3:09-CV-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”), and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “Committee”), as a party to the SEC Action and as a plaintiff in Rotstain, et al.

SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Trustmark, HSBC,1 to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with TrustmarkHSBC, to Enter the Bar Order, and to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees and Bar Order Expenses (the “Motion”) of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (the “Receiver”), as Receiver for the Receivership Estate in SEC ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ International Bank, Ltd., No. 3:09-CV-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”), and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “Committee”), as a party to the SEC Action and as a plaintiff in Rotstain, et al.Action

SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Trustmark, Independent,1 to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with TrustmarkIndependent, to Enter the Bar Order, and to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees and Bar Order Expenses (the “Motion”) of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (the “Receiver”), as Receiver for the Receivership Estate in SEC ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ International Bank, Ltd., No. 3:09-CV-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”), and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “Committee”), as a party to the SEC Action and as a plaintiff in Rotstain, et al.SEC

SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Trustmark, TD Bank,1 to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with TrustmarkTD Bank, to Enter the Bar Order, and to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees and Bar Order Expenses (the “Motion”) of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (the “Receiver”), as Receiver for the Receivership Estate in SEC ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ International Bank, Ltd., No. 3:09-CV-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”), and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “Committee”), as a party to the SEC Action and as a plaintiff in Rotstain, et al.Action