Simplified Method Clause Samples

The Simplified Method clause establishes a streamlined approach for calculating or determining certain contractual obligations or values. Typically, this clause outlines a less complex formula or process for tasks such as payment calculations, performance assessments, or compliance checks, reducing the need for detailed documentation or extensive verification. By providing a straightforward mechanism, the clause minimizes administrative burden and potential disputes, ensuring efficiency and clarity in contract execution.
Simplified Method. An Employee is a Highly Compensated Employee under this simplified method if (i) the Employee is a 5% owner during the Plan Year; (ii) the Employee's compensation for the Plan Year exceeds $75,000 (as adjusted pursuant to Section 415(d) of the Code); (iii) the Employee's compensation for the Plan Year exceeds $50,000 (as adjusted pursuant to Section 415(d) of the Code) and the Employee is in the top-paid group of Employees; or (iv) the Employee is an officer of the Employer and received compensation during the Plan Year that is greater than 50% of the dollar limitation under Code Section 415(b)(1)(A). The lookback provisions of Code Section 414(q) do not apply to determining Highly Compensated Employees under this simplified method. An Employer that applies this simplified method for determining Highly Compensated Employees may choose to apply this method on the basis of the Employer's workforce as of a single day during the Plan Year ("snapshot day"). In applying this simplified method on a snapshot basis, the Employer shall determine who is a Highly Compensated Employee on the basis of the data as of the snapshot day. If the determination of who is a Highly Compensated Employee is made earlier than the last day of the Plan Year, the Employee's compensation that is used to determine an Employee's status must be projected for the Plan Year under a reasonable method established by the Employer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in addition to those Employees who are determined to be highly compensated on the Plan's snapshot day, as described above, where there are Employees who are not employed on the snapshot day but who are taken into account for purposes of testing under Section 5.6 or 5.10, the Employer must treat as a Highly Compensated Employee any Eligible Employee for the Plan Year who: (1) terminated prior to the snapshot day and was a Highly Compensated Employee in the prior year;
Simplified Method. If elected by an eligible Employer in the Adoption Agreement, $50,000 (adjusted by the Adjustment Factor) is substituted for $75,000 in paragraph (1)(A) above, and paragraph (1)(B) above does not apply. An Employer is eligible to make this election only if the Employer maintains significant business activities at which it employs Employees in two (or more) separate geographical areas.
Simplified Method. The simplified method is a modality of the actual indirect costs calculation, and is a way of declaring indirect costs which applies to organisations which do not aggregate their indirect costs at a detailed level (centre, department), but can aggregate their indirect costs at the level of the legal entity. It is a system that can be used if the organisation does not have an accounting system with a detailed cost allocation. This simplified method has to be in accordance with their usual accounting and management principles and practices; it does not involve necessarily the introduction of a new method just for FP7 purposes. Beneficiaries are allowed to use it, provided this simplified approach is based on actual costs derived from the financial accounts of the last closed accounting year. Therefore, beneficiaries using the simplified method shall not submit an adjustment covering the difference between the indirect costs derived from the accounts of the last closed financial year and the indirect costs derived from the financial accounts of the project period. Beneficiaries should be in a position to justify and reconcile the results with the accounting records and be able to demonstrate in case of an audit that the indirect costs are fairly allocated to the research activity/projects. Although each legal entity will use its own system, the minimum requirements for it to be considered a simplified method for FP7 purposes are the following;
Simplified Method. The simplified method is a way of declaring indirect costs which applies to organisations which do not aggregate their indirect costs at a detailed level (centre, department), but can aggregate their indirect costs at the level of the legal entity. It is a system that can be used if the organisation does not have an accounting system with a detailed cost allocation. There are no beneficiaries using the simplified method.
Simplified Method. An Employee is a Highly Compensated Employee under this simplified method if (i) the Employee is a 5% owner during the Plan Year;

Related to Simplified Method

  • Discipline Procedure 1. Disciplinary action may be imposed for violation of written rules and regulations as set forth by the Board, incompetence, inefficiency, dishonesty, drunkenness, immoral conduct, insubordination, discourteous treatment of the public, neglect of duty, misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance, any other failure of good behavior, or conviction of a felony. 2. No employee shall be disciplined without first having had the opportunity for a hearing, if the employee so requests, with an OAPSE representative of his/her choice present. The employee shall be given a written statement containing the charges and the time and place of the hearing. The written statement shall notify the employee of his/her rights to OAPSE representation. The employee must be given the opportunity to sign the statement acknowledging receipt of the statement and date received. Under emergency conditions as determined by the supervisor (including, but not limited to, health and/or safety of the employee or other employees; blatant insubordination; or refusal to work), the supervisor may immediately suspend an employee without pay for a period of up to three (3) work days without the formal hearing described above. An opportunity for a formal hearing with the supervisor must be provided within the suspension period. Failure to provide an opportunity for a hearing during the suspension period shall preclude the right of further discipline for the offense causing the initial suspension. Emergency suspensions will not be subject to Section 6 of this Article. 3. Disciplinary action of less than discharge should generally be progressive and corrective in nature. A. Disciplinary actions shall be grievable. This Section shall supersede existing state law governing termination of employment (O.R.C. 3319.081). B. In determining progressive and corrective action, just cause shall be construed and limited to the nature and seriousness of the offense, the effect the alleged conduct has on the Board’s operation, the discipline or lack thereof used in other similar situations known to the Board, and the appropriateness of the proposed penalty in view of the record and length of service of the charged employee. The enumeration of these factors is not intended to preclude either the exercise of good and sound business judgment or to minimize the importance of an employee’s property interest in his job.