Common use of STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Clause in Contracts

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Consultant under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 appliessection shall apply. Grantee Consultant agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 101, ▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §C.R.S 24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeConsultant’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Consultant shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Consultant demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Consultant and prohibit Grantee Consultant from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Consultant may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeConsultant, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇- ▇▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Colorado Department of Revenue, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-105- 102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT CDOT, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of concerningthe monitoringof vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant onstate contractsand inclusionof contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to tailoredto match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall informationshall be entered into enteredinto the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Consultant under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 appliessection shall apply. Grantee Consultant agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 101, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS C.R.S §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Consultant’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeConsultant’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Consultant shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Consultant demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Consultant and prohibit Grantee Consultant from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Consultant may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeConsultant, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor by State Ordering Entities under this Grant Price Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantPrice Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Price Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein by State Ordering Entities and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Price Agreement term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the State Purchasing Office, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Borrower under this Grant Loan Agreement is greater than $100,000 or greater100,000, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Borrower agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants Loans and inclusion of Grant Loan Agreement performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Borrower’s performance shall may be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantLoan Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Borrower’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Loan Agreement administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Borrower’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Borrower’s obligations under this Grant Loan Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeBorrower’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Loan Agreement term. Grantee Borrower shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Borrower demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Colorado Energy Office, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Borrower and prohibit Grantee Borrower from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Borrower may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeBorrower, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee the Local Agency under this Grant Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 26 applies. Grantee The Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants agreements/contracts and inclusion of Grant agreement/contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇The Local Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantAgreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇the Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Agreement administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇the Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Agreement Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇the Local Agency’s obligations under this Grant Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Granteethe Local Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Agreement term. Grantee The Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ the Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT CDOT, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar the Local Agency and prohibit Grantee the Local Agency from bidding on future GrantsAgreements. Grantee The Local Agency may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Granteethe Local Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.. By CDOT Vendor #: for ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇, Executive Director Date By CORPORATIONS: Attest (Seal) By Clerk and Recorder, City and County of Denver City Attorney for the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER By By Manager of Public Works Assistant City Attorney REGISTERED AND COUNTERSIGNED: By: Manager of Finance CONTRACT CONTROL NUMBER: By: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Auditor

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §2424- 103-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Grantee and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-105- 102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee the Local Agency under this Grant Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 21 applies. Grantee The Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants agreements/contracts and inclusion of Grant agreement/contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇The Local Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantAgreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇the Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Agreement administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇the Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Agreement Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇the Local Agency’s obligations under this Grant Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Granteethe Local Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Agreement term. Grantee The Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ the Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT CDOT, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar the Local Agency and prohibit Grantee the Local Agency from bidding on future GrantsAgreements. Grantee The Local Agency may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Granteethe Local Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Grantee’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Grantee and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Contractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the State Purchasing Office, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management SystemSystem (CMS). ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Colorado Department of Public Safety, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-- ▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Local Agency under this Grant contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor Local Agency performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Local Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grantcontract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Local Agency’s obligations under this Grant contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant contract term. Grantee Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ debar Local Agency and prohibit Grantee Local Agency from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Local Agency may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeLocal Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24▇▇-103- 601▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management SystemSystem (CMS). ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Grant Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Public Safety, and showing of good cause, may ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.