Common use of STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Clause in Contracts

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Contractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation or (b) by exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. ‌ If the maximum amount payable to Contractor Grantee under this Contract Subgrant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time anytime thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System 19 applies. Contractor Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇24-▇▇▇103- 601, §24-▇▇▇, 103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Subgrant performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §▇▇24-▇▇▇103.5-▇▇▇101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Subgrant administration process and Contractor▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorGrantee’s obligations under this Contract Subgrant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of ContractorGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Subgrant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation DNR, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) by under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 201 or 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Contractor Local Agency under this Contract contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this §§ 21. Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇24-▇▇▇103- 601, §24-▇▇▇, 103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor Local Agency performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide Statewide contract management system. ContractorLocal Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation evaluation and Review review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contractcontract, State law, including CRS §▇▇24-▇▇▇103.5-▇▇▇101, and State Fiscal Rulesfiscal rules, Policies policies and Guidanceguidance. Evaluation and Review review of Contractorthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and ContractorLocal Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. Areas of Evaluation evaluation and Review review shall include, but shall not be limited to to, quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorLocal Agency’s obligations under this Contract contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of ContractorLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System Statewide contract management system at intervals established herein and a final Evaluationevaluation, Review review and Rating rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract contract term. Contractor Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation evaluation and Reviewreview, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation evaluation and Review review determine that Contractor Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation Transportation, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Local Agency and prohibit Contractor Local Agency from bidding on future contracts. Contractor Local Agency may contest the final Evaluationevaluation, Review review and Rating rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) by under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 201 or 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorLocal Agency, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. ‌‌ If the maximum amount payable to Contractor Grantee under this Contract Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time anytime thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System 18 applies. Contractor Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by comply with the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24- 103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be subject The State is required to conduct Evaluation and Review of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §▇▇24-▇▇▇103.5-▇▇▇101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and Contractor▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of ContractorGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation HC, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) by under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 201 or 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. A. If the maximum amount payable to Contractor by State Ordering Entities under this Contract Price Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time anytime thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System 18 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §24-103.5-101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor Contractor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractPrice Agreement, State law, including CRS §▇▇24-▇▇▇103.5-▇▇▇101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. . B. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract Price Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Contractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein by State Ordering Entities and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Price Agreement term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work Work progress. . C. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. & Administration D. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §▇▇- ▇▇▇-▇▇▇(6)), or (b) by under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 201 or 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause. E. At the end of the current contract term or sooner in the event the Price Agreement is terminiated prior to the full term, the Contractor shall complete and submit a performance evaluation in a form substantially equivalent to Exhibit D (Sample Contractor Performance Evaluation) attached hereto and incorparted herein.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. A. If the maximum amount payable to Contractor by any one State Ordering Entity under this Contract Addendum is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time anytime thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System applies. 15 applies to that State Ordering Entity’s Orders. i. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §24-102- 205, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, §▇▇24-▇▇▇103.5-▇▇▇, 101 and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ concerning the monitoring of vendor Contractor performance on state contracts Contracts and inclusion of contract Contract performance information in a statewide contract Statewide Contract management system. ii. Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractAddendum, State law, including CRS §▇▇24-▇▇▇-▇▇▇103.5- 101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. iii. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Statewide Contract Management System. iv. At the end of the current Contract term, the State Ordering Entity shall complete and submit a performance Evaluation in a form equivalent to Attachment 3 (Sample Contractor Performance Evaluation). B. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract Addendum shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Contractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein by State Ordering Entities and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 thirty (30) days of the end of the Contract Addendum term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work Work progress. . C. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Department of Transportation State Purchasing & Contracts Office, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contracts. D. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (ai) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation Evaluation (CRS §▇▇- ▇▇▇-▇▇▇(6)), or (bii) by under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 201 or 202, or 204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. ‌ If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time anytime thereafter, this §Statewide Contract Management System 23 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, C.R.S., §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, C.R.S., §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, C.R.S., §24-103.5-101, C.R.S. and §▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇ ▇, C.R.S. concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §▇▇24-▇▇▇103.5-▇▇▇101, C.R.S. and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Contractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Transportation Public Safety, Division of Fire Prevention and Control, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (§24-105- 102(6),C.R.S.), or (b) by under §24-105-102(6), C.R.S. exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201, 201 or 202, or 204, C.R.S. which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.