Student Ratings Instrument Sample Clauses

Student Ratings Instrument. The Administration shall use a university-wide student rating system. The system, and the procedures and practices for the use of the system, shall be agreed upon by written mutual consent between the Administration and the Chapter. Until such written mutual consent is achieved, the current system, procedures, and practices shall continue unchanged. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. The Administration agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews, as one of several sources of evidence of professional competence. By January 15, 2018, the Administration shall provide the Chapter with a list of three to five (3-5) externally developed student ratings instruments that meet university and technical requirements. No later than March 15, 2018, the Chapter shall select an instrument from the list for implementation. The Chapter’s selection will constitute written mutual consent. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the Administration and the Chapter, the selection connotes acceptance of the vendor’s standard item template. If the Chapter chooses not to select a replacement instrument from the list, the existing system shall continue.
Student Ratings Instrument. The Administration shall use a university-wide student rating system. The system, and the procedures and practices for the use of the system, shall be agreed upon by written mutual consent between the Administration and the Chapter. Until such written mutual consent is achieved, the current system, procedures, and practices shall continue unchanged. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. The Administration agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews, as one of several sources of evidence of professional competence.
Student Ratings Instrument. The Administration and the Chapter agree to use the procedures and practices of ICES Online, as developed by the WMU ICES Implementation Committee and approved by the WMU ICES Steering Committee. ICES Online is the online version of the student ratings instrument recommended by the Evaluation Study Committee in its report of February 14, 2003, namely, the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) of the University of Illinois. A Steering Committee will be responsible for policies and procedures for the use of the student ratings instrument. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. The Administration agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews.
Student Ratings Instrument. Western and the Chapter agree to use the student ratings instrument recommended by the Evaluation Study Committee in its report of February 14, 2003, namely, the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) of the University of Illinois. A Steering Committee will be responsible for policies and procedures for the use of the student ratings instrument. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. Western agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews.
Student Ratings Instrument. Western and the Chapter agree to use the procedures and practices of ICES Online, as developed by the WMU ICES Implementation Committee and approved by the WMU ICES Steering Committee. ICES Online is the online version of the student ratings instrument recommended by the Evaluation Study Committee in its report of February 14, 2003, namely, the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) of the University of Illinois. A Steering Committee will be responsible for policies and procedures for the use of the student ratings instrument. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. Western agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews.

Related to Student Ratings Instrument

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Credit Ratings Use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain at all times (a) a credit rating by each of S&P and ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ in respect of the Term Facility and (b) a public corporate rating by S&P and a public corporate family rating by ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ for the Borrower, in each case with no requirement to maintain any specific minimum rating.