Subsequent Litigation Sample Clauses

The Subsequent Litigation clause defines how legal actions or disputes that arise after the execution of an agreement are to be handled. Typically, this clause outlines the procedures for addressing new lawsuits or claims related to the subject matter of the contract, such as requiring notification to the other party or specifying which party is responsible for defending or settling such claims. Its core practical function is to allocate responsibility and establish a clear process for managing future legal disputes, thereby reducing uncertainty and potential conflict between the parties.
Subsequent Litigation. Unless the parties and the non-attorney professional Team member or expert agree otherwise, if they select and retain a Team member and/or a joint neutral expert to assist in the Collaborative Process, neither of them may retain such Team member or expert, nor may such Team member or expert participate, in any subsequent litigation between them, whether as an expert, a witness, or in any other capacity. If the parties agree, either of their Collaborative attorneys may be required to testify to confidential information in subsequent litigation. Collaborative Communications Privilege. Collaborative Communication shall be defined as an oral, written, or recorded statement that is made to conduct, participate in, continue, or reconvene a Collaborative Process after the Collaborative Participation Agreement is signed and before the Collaborative Process is concluded. Recorded statement is defined as information which is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form. Collaborative Communications cannot be introduced in evidence or compelled to be produced as part of the court discovery process, absent consent of the parties and, in the case of a Collaborative Communication by a non-attorney team member or joint expert, the consent of such Team member or expert. Shared Communications Among Team Members, Jointly Retained Experts, and the Other Party. The parties understand that, by signing this Participation Agreement, they are authorizing the Team members to share the parties’ individual communications in this Process, including otherwise privileged or confidential information, among all of the Team members, other professionals retained jointly by the parties in the Collaborative Process, and the other party. Each party instructs his or her attorney and other Team members to have whatever discussions among themselves as are necessary to assist the parties to resolve their differences during the Collaborative Process, including discussions outside of their presence, and including the disclosure of otherwise privileged or confidential information. By signing this Participation Agreement, the parties also instruct their Team Members and jointly retained experts not to share their Collaborative Communications outside the Process.
Subsequent Litigation. Unless the parties and the non-attorney professional Team member or expert agree otherwise, if they select and retain a Team member and/or a joint neutral expert to assist in the Collaborative Process, neither of them may retain such Team member or expert, nor may such Team member or expert participate, in any subsequent litigation between them, whether as an expert, a witness, or in any other capacity. If the parties agree, either of their Collaborative attorneys may be required to testify to confidential information in subsequent litigation.
Subsequent Litigation. In the event the Owner, Litigation Counsel or AMH identifies any opportunities to further monetize the Patents in addition to the then currently Identified Litigation (including, without limitation, the initial Identified Litigation), and the Owner intends to bring one or more subsequent Litigation with respect to such monetization opportunity (each a “Subsequent Litigation”), the identifying party shall promptly provide written notice to AMH of such Subsequent Litigation. (a) After providing such notice of a Subsequent Litigation opportunity, Owner shall in good faith promptly provide to AMH a complete package of all case underwriting materials required by AMH, including but not limited to a case narrative, claim charts, invalidity assessments, preliminary third-party damages analysis, and litigation budget (the “Underwriting Materials”), which materials will be substantially similar to those materials required to underwrite any existing Identified Litigation. (b) Upon receipt of the Underwriting Materials, and for a period of sixty (60) days thereafter (the “Option Period”), AMH shall have the exclusive option, but not the obligation, to structure and provide Litigation Funding with respect to such Subsequent Litigation on the same economic terms set forth herein for any Litigation. (c) Upon electing to provide funding for such Subsequent Litigation, AMH shall provide written notice of such election to Owner (an “Election Notice”). After providing the Election Notice, AMH shall have thirty (30) days to cause the applicable Subsequent Funding Party to commit to providing litigation funding in an aggregate amount up to the total Costs provided in a litigation budget prepared by Owner’s Subsequent Litigation Counsel, in a process substantially similar to the underwriting and funding process set forth in this Agreement for the initial Identified Litigation, recognizing that terms and conditions for such Subsequent Litigation shall be negotiated in good faith and mutually agreed upon between Owner and AMH. (d) If AMH does not provide an Election Notice prior to the expiration of the Option Period, the Subsequent Litigation opportunity will be deemed declined (a “Declined Opportunity”), at which time Owner shall be released to seek funding for such Declined Opportunity from other sources not Affiliated with AMH. AMH or the Funding Party (as the case may be) shall continue to be entitled to any proceeds pursuant to Section 3(c) with respect to any licensing of ...
Subsequent Litigation. If subsequent litigation occurs, the Participants agree that: 13.5.1 Neither will introduce as evidence in court any written or oral information generated or documents prepared during the Collaborative process, including e-mails, voice mails, letters, progress notes, session notes, budgets and projections and proposals for settlement. Only documents such as sworn financial statements and original financial documents may be introduced in court. 13.5.2 Neither will introduce as evidence in court nor require the production of any reports, opinions or notes prepared by any other professional in the Collaborative process, except as follows: professional reports may be used in the event that the Collaborative process terminates, on written consent of both Participants. 13.5.3 Neither will compel or subpoena either lawyer or any other professional retained in the Collaborative process to attend court to testify or attend a deposition to testify under oath about matters discussed in the Collaborative process. 13.5.4 Only the fact that Collaborative process was attempted and final settlement was not reached may be introduced into evidence in court, unless we agree otherwise, in writing.
Subsequent Litigation. If subsequent litigation occurs, the Participants agree that: (1) Neither Participant will introduce as evidence in court any written or oral information generated, or documents prepared, during the Collaborative process, including e-mails, voice mails, letters, progress notes, session notes, budgets and projections and proposals for settlement. Only documents such as sworn financial statements and original financial documents may be introduced in court, unless the Participants mutually agree otherwise; provided, however, that a Collaborative professional who generated a document cannot be compelled or subpoenaed to testify at any court hearing or deposition about matters related to the document. (2) Neither Participant will introduce as evidence in court, nor require the production of, any reports, opinions or notes prepared by any other professional in the Collaborative process, except as follows: professional reports may be used in the event that the Collaborative process terminates on written consent of both Participants; provided, however, that the Collaborative professional who generated the report cannot be compelled or subpoenaed to testify at any court hearing or deposition about matters related to the report. (3) Neither Participant will compel nor subpoena either Collaborative attorney or any other Collaborative professional retained in the Collaborative process to attend court or a deposition to testify about matters discussed in the Collaborative process. We intend this provision to benefit the Collaborative professionals on our case, and agree that Collaborative professionals shall be regarded as third party beneficiaries of this provision of our Participation Agreement, such that they can request enforcement of this contractual provision if any Participant seeks to compel or subpoena a professional to testify regarding matters discussed in the Collaborative process. (4) Only the fact that Collaborative process was attempted and final settlement was not reached may be introduced into evidence in court, unless we agree otherwise in writing.
Subsequent Litigation. No team member can participate in any subsequent litigation between the parties even if the parties agree otherwise and desire the team members’ participation.
Subsequent Litigation. In the event of any litigation or arbitration arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement of its costs and attorneys' fees and expenses.
Subsequent Litigation. It is understood that the Board of the Condominium is elected by the members of the Association and that the Board members change from time to time. Further, Owner recognizes the authority of the Board to grant approval for the installation and location of the Modification and/or Addition is unclear and that a subsequent Board may wish to rescind the authority and demand removal of the Modification and/or Addition.

Related to Subsequent Litigation

  • Stockholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any stockholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Shareholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any shareholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Subsequent Actions If, at any time after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall consider or be advised that any deeds, bills of sale, assignments, assurances or any other actions or things are necessary or desirable to vest, perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving Corporation its right, title or interest in, to or under any of the rights, properties or assets of either of the Company or Merger Sub acquired or to be acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a result of, or in connection with, the Merger or otherwise to carry out this Agreement, the officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation shall be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of either the Company or Merger Sub, all such deeds, bills of sale, assignments and assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of each of such corporations or otherwise, all such other actions and things as may be necessary or desirable to vest, perfect or confirm any and all right, title and interest in, to and under such rights, properties or assets in the Surviving Corporation or otherwise to carry out this Agreement.

  • Pending Litigation Financial position and prospective long-term profitability of the Single Tenderer, and in the case the Tenderer is a JV, of each member of the JV, shall remain sound according to criteria established with respect to Financial Capability under paragraph I (i) above assuming that all pending litigation will be resolved against the Tenderer. Tenderer shall provide information on pending litigations as per Form CON-2.

  • Material Litigation Promptly after the commencement thereof, notice of all actions, suits, investigations, litigation and proceedings before any court or governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, affecting any Loan Party or any of its Subsidiaries of the type described in Section 4.01(f), and promptly after the occurrence thereof, notice of any material adverse change in the status or the financial effect on any Loan Party or any of its Subsidiaries of the Material Litigation from that described on Schedule 4.01(f) hereto.