Success Metrics Sample Clauses

Success Metrics. 1. A [***] has been [***] possessing characteristics 1 through 4 as described in the Phase 1 Success Metrics. 2. Demonstration that the [***]. 3. Steady-state operation of [***] syngas. Phase 3 Success Metrics: Delivery of a Blank Process Book [***] as further described in Appendix 4. [***] Indicates that text has been omitted which is the subject of a confidential treatment request. The text has been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
View Source
Success Metrics. The product is built on established success metrics. You should analyze your Lucky Savers account performance just as you would any other product. Key metrics you should plan to track include: Number of accounts opened Number of deposits per account Average deposit Total deposits Number of new members opening accounts Comparable data for a similar share certificate product Individual credit unions will set their own goals for the above metrics.
View Source
Success Metrics. The parties will cooperate to develop mutually-agreeable metrics for analyzing the success of their marketing and promotion efforts and the overall performance of the integrated Noosh Service and PEX Service. The first set of metrics will be developed by the end of the third calendar quarter of 2000, and the parties will thereafter develop success goals and implementation plans for each successive three (3) and six (6) month period for the remainder of the term of the Agreement.
View Source
Success Metrics. To measure the effectiveness of our training and capacity-building initiatives, LSPS Solutions will track: ● Knowledge Retention: Pre- and post-training assessments to evaluate knowledge gained. ● User Adoption Rates: Percentage of staff actively using AI tools after training. ● Performance Improvement: Measurable improvements in workflows (e.g., reduced task completion time, increased efficiency). ● Staff Confidence: Surveys to assess staff confidence in managing AI tools.
View Source
Success Metrics. A strain has been developed and run at Project Lighthouse possessing characteristics 1 through 4 as described in the Phase 1 Success Metrics.
View Source

Related to Success Metrics

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Performance Metrics The Influencer shall aim for a minimum engagement rate of [SPECIFY PERCENTAGE, e.g., 3%] on all posts associated with the Campaign. Engagement rate is calculated as the sum of likes, comments, shares, and other interactions divided by the total number of followers at the time of posting. The Influencer agrees to achieve a minimum reach of [SPECIFY NUMBER] unique viewers per post, or a cumulative reach of [SPECIFY NUMBER] across the Campaign. Impressions data will be provided through the Influencer’s analytics tools and verified by the Company when requested. For posts incorporating a call-to-action, such as links to the Company’s website or landing page, the Influencer will target a CTR of at least [SPECIFY PERCENTAGE, e.g., 2%]. CTR is measured as the ratio of clicks to impressions, based on data from tracking links provided by the Company. The Influencer may be expected to drive specific actions (e.g., sales, sign-ups, downloads) using unique tracking codes or referral links. Specific conversion targets will be detailed between the Parties. The Influencer shall submit performance reports on a [WEEKLY/BI-WEEKLY/MONTHLY] basis. These reports must include detailed metrics for each published post, such as: number of likes, comments, shares, and other engagement interactions; reach and impressions per post; click-through data and referral link activity; and conversion data (if applicable). Within [NUMBER] days following the end of the Campaign, the Influencer shall provide a comprehensive post-campaign report summarizing overall performance against all agreed KPIs, including supporting documentation (e.g., screenshots, analytics dashboard exports). The Influencer agrees to provide access to analytics platforms or third-party verification tools to authenticate the reported data, if requested by the Company. The Parties agree to conduct a review of the performance metrics within the first [NUMBER] days of the Campaign to ensure the targets remain realistic and reflective of current market conditions. Adjustments may be made in writing if necessary. If the Influencer consistently fails to meet the established KPIs without valid justification, the Parties shall meet in good faith to discuss potential remedies, which may include adjustments to the compensation structure or additional promotional support, as mutually agreed upon. The Company may specify certain analytics tools or platforms for measuring and reporting performance metrics. The Influencer shall utilize these specified tools where applicable to ensure consistency and transparency in data reporting. In instances where independent verification of performance data is required, the Influencer agrees to cooperate with third-party verification services designated by the Company to validate the metrics reported.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.