Summary of Reviewer Replies Clause Samples

The 'Summary of Reviewer Replies' clause outlines the process for compiling and presenting the feedback or responses provided by reviewers during a review process. Typically, this clause specifies who is responsible for summarizing the replies, the format in which the summary should be delivered, and any deadlines for submission. For example, it may require the lead reviewer or an editor to consolidate all reviewer comments into a single document for the author or decision-maker. The core function of this clause is to ensure that feedback is organized and accessible, streamlining communication and facilitating efficient decision-making or revisions.
Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 10.4 for details).  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, USDA-FS  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, WA Department of Fish and Wildlife The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, US Fish and Wildlife Service  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Town of Concrete  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Skagit County Parks and Recreation
View SourceView Similar (2)
Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 9.4 for details).  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Department of Natural Resources  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, USDA Forest Service (comments provided on 11/30 and 12/09) The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
View SourceView Similar (2)
Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 5.4 for details). ▪ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, US Forest Service ▪ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ▪ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, NOAA Fisheries 5.4 Reviewer Comments and PSE Response‌ The Forest Service has no comments on the following plans: The preliminary Emergency Response Plan for the Adult Fish Trap The O&M Plan for the Adult Fish Trap Thank you Thank you for your response. (No revisions to plan.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) has reviewed the Upstream Fish Trap Preliminary Operations and Maintenance Plan. We have no comments at this time. WDFW has participated in continuous consultation with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) for many years on the ▇▇▇▇▇ River Hydroelectric Project. WDFW appreciates PSE’s willingness to collaborate with WDFW and other signatories to the Settlement Agreement on their many license implementation activities. WDFW welcomes the opportunity to work with PSE on future projects. We value our working relationship with PSE and encourage future dialog. If you have any questions or need more information or clarification to comments from the WDFW, please feel free to call me at (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. Thank you for your response. (No revisions to plan.)
View Source
Summary of Reviewer Replies. The following reviewers sent comments to PSE about the BLRP (see Section 9.4 for details).  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, North Cascades Conservation Council  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, US Fish and Wildlife Service The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Department of Natural Resources  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Town of Concrete  ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Sauk-Suiattle Tribal Community  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, USDA-FS
View Source
Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 9.4 for details).  ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, USDA Forest Service (comments provided on 11/30 and 12/09) The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, North Cascades Conservation Council  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Department of Natural Resources
View Source
Summary of Reviewer Replies. The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see Section 9.4 for details).  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, North Cascades Conservation Council  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, USDA-FS The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Department of Natural Resources  ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Town of Concrete  ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office
View Source

Related to Summary of Reviewer Replies

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • REPORT SUBMISSION 1. Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, and required by PART I of this form shall be submitted, when required by 2 CFR 200.512, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) as provided in 2 CFR 200.36 and 200.512 A. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse designated in 2 CFR §200.501(a) (the number of copies required by 2 CFR §200.501(a) should be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse), at the following address: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Submissions of the Single Audit reporting package for fiscal periods ending on or after January 1, 2008, must be submitted using the Federal Clearinghouse’s Internet Data Entry System which can be found at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/facweb/ 2. Copies of financial reporting packages required by PART II of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following: A. The Department of Environmental Protection at one of the following addresses: By Mail: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General, MS 40 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇ B. The Auditor General’s Office at the following address: Auditor General Local Government Audits/342 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Building, Room ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-1450 The Auditor General’s website (▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/) provides instructions for filing an electronic copy of a financial reporting package. 3. Copies of reports or management letters required by PART III of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Department of Environmental Protection at one of the following addresses: By Mail: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General, MS 40 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇ 4. Any reports, management letters, or other information required to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted timely in accordance with 2 CFR 200.512, section 215.97, F.S., and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable. 5. Recipients, when submitting financial reporting packages to the Department of Environmental Protection for audits done in accordance with 2 CFR 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, or Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) and 10.650 (non and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date and the reporting package was delivered to the recipient correspondence accompanying the reporting package.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Invoice Submission All invoices submitted by Contractor shall include the City Contract Number, an assigned Invoice Number, and an Invoice Date. City will provide Contractor with an invoice cover sheet. Invoice cover sheets are required to be accurately completed and submitted with each invoice. Contractor shall submit the original invoice, no more than once monthly, through the responsible City Project Manager at: City of Ocala Engineering Department, Attn: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Address: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, E-Mail: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.