Summer Institute Clause Samples
The "Summer Institute" clause defines the terms and conditions related to a specific educational program or event held during the summer, often organized by an institution or organization. This clause typically outlines details such as the duration, eligibility requirements, curriculum, and participant obligations for the summer institute. For example, it may specify the dates of the program, the application process, and any fees or materials required. Its core practical function is to clearly establish the framework and expectations for participation in the summer institute, ensuring that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities.
Summer Institute. District Director leads the district’s AVID site team facilitation at the AVID Summer Institute. The District Director attends Summer Institute as part of their ongoing training, therefore the Summer Institute registration fee for the District Director is included in the Total District Director Professional Services Price.
Summer Institute. 1. Employees will be in attendance up to ten (10) work days, each seven (7) hours long, following the last day of school (herein referred to as the “Summer Institute”). The scheduling of such Summer Institute days shall be agreed upon between the Head of School and the UFT Chapter Leader as early in the school year as practicable. The Summer Institute will be used by the School to provide Employees with job-related professional training, as well as to prepare for the following school year.
2. Employees will receive additional compensation for participation in the Summer Institute at their hourly salary rate in effect on the last day of school in June.
Summer Institute. In 2014 a CCM institute will be among the summer institutes offered. Faculty members will be paid at the summer institute rate of $125 per day.
Summer Institute. The Summer Institute is provided to new schools implementing SpringBoard for the first time, or in exceptional cases, to renewing schools with sufficient numbers of new untrained teachers, The Summer Institute shall consist of a period of five (5)} successive days mutually selected, agreed upon, and scheduled by the College Board and Client, which will precede the students’ first day of an academic year and wherein the College Board will provide Client officials and the Schools’ teachers and administrators with instructional strategies, technical training, and associated support needed to implement and sustain the SpringBoard Program in the Schools. At each Summer Institute the College Board will provide each attending teacher from the Schools with one teacher version of the instructional materials (which includes the student content of the instructional materials). Client may purchase additional copies of the instructional materials from the College Board, in accordance with Attachment III Scope of Products.
Summer Institute the dept. of curriculum studies’ educa- tional technology And design summer institute will take place July 3, 4 and 5. the institute is a research-focused gathering with all participants staying at st. Peter’s college in muenster. there will be sched- uled sessions, unstructured collaborative time and opportunities to generate research ideas. for more information, visit ▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/ Coming events information for coming events will be accepted until 5 pm on deadline day. next ocn: friday, Aug 30, 2013 deadline: thursday, Aug 22, 2013 ▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇, fax ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ or use web submission form at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ A trio of researchers at the new Experimental Decision Laboratory is striving to better understand how individuals, groups and even nations make decisions about innovation that affect health care, food, business, and even personal lives. “The socio-economic world is inextricably linked to the political and policy space,” said ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, professor with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Graduate School of Public Policy, explaining that decisions are made at all stages of innovation, from early development and evaluation, to public approval and acceptance. The lab, located in the Social Sciences Research Laboratory in the Arts Building, is unusual in that it combines research in three disciplines – public policy, psychology and economics. This is a powerful combination, said ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, who co-leads the lab with ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, associate professor in the Department of Bioresource Policy, Business and Economics, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, professor and head of the Department of Psychology. “Being able to test for the full array of effects, separately, and then jointly, will help us understand more completely the challenges of generating optimal innovation,” ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ said. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ explained that the three disciplines are all interested in decision- making, but from different angles. Psychologists are often interested in cognitive capacity, economists in transactions and exchanges, and policy analysts in how individual decisions affect others. In particular, the researchers will be looking at how people’s biases affect decision-making in areas like expert-lay relationships (as in health care), markets for new products and regulation of new technologies and innovative products. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ cites research that shows that all decisions will be biased, but context is everything. In general, the more comfortable people are, the less risk they ...