Decision Criteria Clause Samples
Decision Criteria. Ground Summary Never was the Registered Keeper / Person Liable in relation to the Vehicle in question Reason Code Detail Never Owned States they never owned Vehicle, but no details or evidence provided RREJ10 Decision Reject Detail Never Owned States they never owned or were not the Registered Keeper/Person Liable on the date of Contravention. System shows that DVLA Registered Keeper/Person Liable details have been superseded and one of the following circumstances applies: • no start or end date was entered from previous details (either hire or sale). • details entered were incorrect. RACC10 Decision Accept – Reissue to previous Registered Keeper/Person Liable. Detail Never Owned States they never owned and never kept the Vehicle and provides one of the following: • confirmation letter from DVLA or affidavit. RACC10 Decision Accept Detail Ringer/Clone States Vehicle was never at the location (Cloned / Ringed), but provides no evidence – Image confirms same VRM, make, model and colour. Decision Reject Additional Information Ask for evidence to confirm. Evidence can be: • proof of Vehicle at different location - acceptable evidence includes tracker report, statements from colleagues, neighbours asserting Vehicle at different location; • photos of Vehicle that show a difference in the Vehicles (i.e. number plate maker/ garage name); • proof of involvement of another enforcement agency (i.e. previous dealings with police or local authority that have confirmed Vehicle is Cloned / Ringed); • proof that a crime has been previously reported (including crime reference number) (i.e. person has had previous dealing with police regarding the Cloned Vehicle such as a speeding fine, which has resulted in the police recording the Vehicle as Cloned / Ringed); or • Affidavit affirming Vehicle was not in the CCZ. RREJ12 Detail Ringer/Clone States Vehicle was never at the location (Cloned/Ringed) and provides one of the following: • proof of Vehicle at different location - acceptable evidence includes tracker report, statements from colleagues, neighbours asserting Vehicle at different location; • photos of Vehicle that show a difference in the Vehicles (i.e. number plate maker/ garage name); • proof of involvement of another enforcement agency (i.e. previous dealings with police or local authority that have confirmed Vehicle is Cloned/Ringed); • proof that a crime has been previously reported (including crime reference number) (i.e. person has had previous dealing with poli...
Decision Criteria. The decision to impose either corrective or disciplinary action and which type of action to impose will be based on just cause and governed by the nature, severity, and effect of the offense; the type and frequency of previous offenses; the period of time elapsed since a prior offensive act; the record and the length of service to the Agency; and consideration of extenuating circumstances. The Agency will ensure that all employees are equally treated with respect and dignity and are afforded the right of privacy when being counseled on performance issues. Disciplinary action may be imposed whether or not corrective action has preceded it, however, before a written warning is given as correction action, it generally will be preceded by oral counseling. The employee against whom any disciplinary action is brought will be notified of such action as soon as it is initiated and will be kept informed of all processes during the disciplinary action. Not more than one (1) form of disciplinary action may be in effect against an employee at any one (1) time for the same infraction, except in the case of a suspension pending a dismissal action.
Decision Criteria. The Director may approve the proposed Agreement upon a written finding that it will: 1) promote the conservation of all natural resources; 2) promote the prevention of economic and physical waste; and 3) provide for the protection of all parties of interest, including the state. 11 AAC 83.303(a). The following evaluates the proposed Slugger Unit under these criteria.
1. The Conservation of All Natural Resources
Decision Criteria. A development agreement (general development agreement and development agreements in order to increase height above 70 feet) may be granted by the City only if the applicant demonstrates that:
1. The project is consistent with goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. If the project is located within a subarea plan, then the project shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the subarea plan.
2. The proposed development uses innovative, aesthetic, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable architecture and site design.
3. There is either sufficient capacity and infrastructure (e.g., roads, sidewalks, bike lanes) that meet the City’s adopted level of service standards (as confirmed by the performance of a transportation impact analysis) in the transportation system (motorized and nonmotorized) to safely support the development proposed in all future phases or there will be adequate capacity and infrastructure by the time each phase of development is completed. If capacity or infrastructure must be increased to support the proposed development agreement, then the applicant must identify a plan for funding their proportionate share of the improvements.
4. There is either sufficient capacity within public services such as water, sewer and stormwater to adequately serve the development proposal in all future phases, or there will be adequate capacity available by the time each phase of development is completed. If capacity must be increased to support the proposed development agreement, then the applicant must identify a plan for funding their proportionate share of the improvements.
5. The development agreement proposal contains architectural design (including but not limited to building setbacks, insets, facade breaks, roofline variations) and site design standards, landscaping, provisions for open space and/or recreation areas, retention of significant trees, parking/traffic management and multimodal transportation improvements and other features that minimize conflicts and create transitions between the proposal site and property zoned R-4, R-6, R-8 or MUR-35'.
6. The project is consistent with the standards of the critical areas regulations, Chapter
Decision Criteria. 15 The arbitrator shall base the decision on the following criteria:
16 A. The long-term stability and viability of the Plan.
17 B. The best interests of the Plan participants.
18 C. The equitable allocation of any increased costs of providing 19 health, dental and vision benefits under the plan.
Decision Criteria. The decision to impose either corrective or disciplinary action and which type of action to impose shall be governed by the nature, severity, and effect of the offense; the type and frequency of previous offenses; the period of time elapsed since a prior offensive act; the record and the length of service to the Agency; and consideration of extenuating circumstances. The Agency shall ensure that all employees are equally treated with respect and dignity and are afforded the right of privacy when being counseled on performance issues. Disciplinary action may be imposed whether or not corrective action has preceded it. The employee against whom any disciplinary action is brought shall be notified of such action as soon as it is initiated and shall be kept informed of all processes during the disciplinary action. Not more than one (1) form of disciplinary action may be in effect against an employee at any one (1) time for the same infraction, except in the case of a suspension pending a dismissal action.
Decision Criteria. 26 The arbitrator shall base the decision on the following criteria:
Decision Criteria. Before authorizing an employee to telework, the manager must analyze each request and ensure that the following conditions apply:
4.1 The nature of the work to be performed must be operationally feasible; check if the use of resources is only available at the workplace (e.g. files, high speed internet access, equipment, tools, etc.).
4.2 The work to be done and the deliverables can be easily measured and verified remotely.
4.3 The employee is able to provide the same level of customer service at a distance.
4.4 The employee has the equipment, supplies and tools related to the technologies required for telework; the employer will not assume any costs associated with the subscription to a high-speed Internet connection or to adequate telephone service, including voice mail.
4.5 There are no repercussions or harm to colleagues, clients, citizens, and other collaborators.
4.6 The employee maintains an adequate level of performance.
4.7 The employee is able to provide quality work independently.
4.8 The telework location meets occupational health and safety criteria and the "Safe and Appropriate Home Office Design Questionnaire" has been completed by the employee; the employer will not incur any costs associated with upgrading the telework location to meet health and safety provisions.
4.9 The employee has consulted the documentation related to cybersecurity.
Decision Criteria. All applications for grants must be received by the deadline date of the corresponding funding cycle as published. Once a complete application has been submitted in conformity with these guidelines, the amount of grant funds requested will be compared to the amount of available funds. Projects with the highest rankings will be prioritized. If the total requested amount exceeds the available funds, then the Committee will rank the applications based on the criteria listed below. Properties that have not received funding in previous funding cycles, may have a higher scoring potential for project approval/funding in an effort to evenly distribute funds across the district. The City’s final decision is not appealable by applicants. The Committee reserves the right to reduce grant awards if project activities are ineligible or the amounts requests exceed available funding. The Committee may consider projects outside of the application review window if funding is available. Projects will be ranked, and prioritized. Grants will be given to projects that result in comprehensive restoration or substantial improvement to the exterior of an entire building or façade. Priority will be given to projects that result in comprehensive restoration, high visibility and impact on public streets and for projects supporting independent businesses not required by a contractual arrangement to maintain standardized décor, architecture, signs or similar features. The criteria listed below (in no particular order) will be taken into account: ● Instances where an immediate renovation would stop serious deterioration of the building’s façade and where historic or architecturally significant features contributing to the building’s character are in danger of being lost ● Projects that would restore the historic features of a building ● Projects that would improve the architectural integrity of a building ● Projects that demonstrate the ability to attract people to the Uptown District ● Projects that would result in significant new investment and the creation of jobs in the Uptown District ● Projects involving buildings with vacant or underutilized spaces where the overall marketability of the building would be improved ● Projects that incorporate mixed uses or multiple tenants ● Applications that demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to complete the project