Table 0 Sample Clauses

Table 0. 4: Development needs of universities (rang, mean) Increase the practical orientation of teaching Enhance traineeships and internships Improvements in their financial systems Focus on short-term skill development Focus on long-term skill development Support an international orientation Focus on research and development Enabling the valorisation of applied research Strategic cooperation with business Non/minor extent of 1. 3. 8. 9. 4. 5. 7. 6. 2. UBC 6,12 5,71 4,72 4,62 5,69 5,45 4,91 4,94 5,95 Medium extent of 2. 3. 8. 9. 5. 4. 7. 6. 1. UBC 6,10 5,73 4,96 4,65 5,35 5,44 5,24 5,28 6,25 High extent of 2. 3. 8. 9. 6. 4. 7. 5. 1. UBC 6,33 5,96 5,42 4,64 5,62 5,83 5,51 5,81 6,56 Question B4: In your view, to what extent should higher education institutions change in the future? Mean of responses of a 7-level scale where 1=”Not at all” and 7=”To a very high extent”. When comparing the reported results among EMCOSU countries there are just minor differences regarding the developmental needs that should be implemented in the future in order to enhance university-business cooperation. Bulgarian, Slovenian and Spanish representatives reported that there should be tendencies towards the development of strategic cooperation with business, and Hungarian and Polish representatives reported that higher education institutions should increase practical orientation of teaching. Comparing to other countries there is a high tendency of Slovenian representative to support an international orientation. Lower emphasis for the future developments, however still with relatively high mean (4,61), was reported for focus on short-term skill development and improvements of the higher education financial systems (mean in total 4,99).
Table 0. 2 1995 and proposed year 2030 surface water diversion. Note: The diversions described below, combined with the dry year actions, will meet each supplier’s customer needs
Table 0. 4 Table 1. Water Forum cost-sharing for lower American River habitat projects. PROJECT/STUDY AGENCY ANNUAL COST Years 2-4 Ongoing Wetland/Slough Complex SAFCA CALFED4 Water Forum Unknown Unknown $25,000 To be determined Shaded Riverine Aquatic Habitat SAFCA CALFED Water Forum Unknown Unknown $25,000 To be determined Tailrace Habitat Utilization Study CALFED Water Forum $15,000 $15,000 Study Complete Thermal Refugia Utilization Study CALFED Water Forum $25,000 $25,000 Study Complete Off-site Mitigation (if required) Water Forum Unknown Unknown Monitoring and Evaluation SAFCA Water Forum $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 4 CALFED – a state and federal program for… CVPIA $100,000 $100,000 Plan Development, Updating and Technical Assistance SAFCA CALFED CVPIA $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 Table 0.5 Table 2. Additional lower American River habitat projects. These are additional projects and studies that would be carried out by other organizations. High New Flow Standards Project City of Sacramento City of Sacramento High Flow Fluctuation Criteria Project CVPIA Reclamation USBR High Dry Year Flow Augmentation Project CVPIA PCWA Reclamation USBR /USFWS High Folsom Temperature Control Device (TCD) Project Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR High Folsom Reservoir Cold Water Pool Management Project SCWA Folsom SJWD Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR High In Stream Cover (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇) Project Corps SAFCA Corps SAFCA High Flood Control Channel Improvement Project SAFCA Corps SAFCA High Spawning Habitat Management/ Maintenance Study, Project CVPIA CALFED CDFW CDFG USFWS High Hatchery Temperature Control Project Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR High Hatchery Management Practices Project Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR Moderate Fire Management Project Sacramento County Sacramento County Low Increase Artificial Production of Salmonids Project Reclamation USBR CDFW CDFG Low Angling Regulations Project CDFW CDFG CDFW CDFG
Table 0 a – Content from New Partners

Related to Table 0

  • Table 3 Appendix Information

  • Table 2 Determinations Determination Concerning Determiner 2.8.2.7 Complaints and Grievances Under the Decision Making Model

  • Table 4 Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum Changes

  • Table 2 (definition of “Casino Gross Revenue”) 15(e) 2 (definition of “Commissioning”) 19 2 (definition of “Committee’s Nominated Representative) 20(1) 6(1)(c) 20(2) 7(8)(a) 21(d) 11(1) 21(e) 11(2) 22(2) 11(3) 23(b) 14(d) 33(2) 15(a)(B) 35(1) 15(b)(i) 35(2) 15(c) 36(b) 15(d) 36(c)

  • Table 1 Parties Start date The Effective Date of the Agreement The Parties Exporter (who sends the Restricted Transfer) Importer (who receives the Restricted Transfer) Parties’ details Customer Full legal name: Webflow, Inc. Main address (if a company registered address): ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. ▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ Key Contact Attn: Customer Contact details including email: email address provided by Customer Attn: Privacy Counsel Contact details including email: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇