Tax Efficient Structure Sample Clauses

A Tax Efficient Structure clause defines the parties' intention to organize their business arrangement in a way that minimizes tax liabilities and maximizes after-tax benefits. This clause typically allows the parties to cooperate in selecting the most favorable legal entities, jurisdictions, or transaction structures to achieve optimal tax outcomes, provided such arrangements remain compliant with applicable laws. Its core practical function is to ensure that both parties can benefit from legitimate tax planning strategies, thereby reducing overall tax exposure and increasing the financial efficiency of the transaction.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 24 times
Tax Efficient Structure. Each Party shall attempt, in good faith, to structure the receipt of Proceeds in the most tax-efficient manner practicable so that there are no unnecessary deductions or withholdings (a “Tax Efficient Structure”), and will consider, in good faith, reasonable Tax Efficient Structures for payment of the Proceeds and other payments due to the Funder recommended by tax counsel or advisors to the Claimholder in that regard, and will consider, in good faith, commercially reasonable methods (including a trust) to effect the foregoing. The Claimholder and the Funder hereby agree that their respective tax counsel or advisors shall consult with each other in order to implement a Tax Efficient Structure.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Tax Efficient Structure. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Board determined that a Reverse ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Trust-type structure was an effective and efficient choice for the Transactions because, among other things, it provides a tax-efficient method to combine ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the HHNF Business, thereby making a Reverse ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Trust-type structure economically more appealing to the parties as compared to a taxable transaction structure. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Board weighed this advantage against the potentially negative factor that, to preserve the tax-free treatment of the Spinco Distribution and any related transactions, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ is required to abide by certain restrictions that could limit its ability to engage in certain future business transactions that may otherwise be advantageous. ​ The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Board considered the following additional factors as generally supporting its determination: • its belief that the Transactions are more favorable to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shareholders than the potential value that would result from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ continuing without a combination with the HHNF Business; ​ • ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ management’s knowledge of the current business climate and trends in the industry in which ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the HHNF Business operate and the prospective climate in which ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will operate following the completion of the Transactions, including, but not limited to, industry, economic and market conditions and the competitive environment, such as attractive demand trends in heath, hygiene & personal care, aging populations and reusability of products; • the expectation that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shareholders as of immediately prior to the First Effective Time are expected to own approximately 10% of the outstanding shares of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ common stock immediately following the completion of the Transactions, and will have the opportunity to share in the potential future growth and expected synergies of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ while retaining the flexibility of selling all or a portion of those shares; ​ • the expectation that the combination of the experience of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ and the HHNF Business’ employees will drive improvements in production, innovation, leadership and growth and enhance ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ ability to achieve its strategic objectives; ​ • the fact that the RMT Transaction Agreement and the other Transaction Documents and the aggregate consideration to be paid by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ pursuant to the RMT Transaction Agreement were the result of extensive arm’s-length negotiations between representatives of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇, and the ▇...
View Source
Tax Efficient Structure. [REDACTED]
View Source
Tax Efficient Structure. When structuring Investments of the Partnership or any Alternative Investment Structure (and when forming Alternative Investment Structures), the General Partner shall consider the tax consequences to the Partners and shall use reasonable efforts to structure such Investments and entities in a tax-efficient manner, taking into account .
View Source
Tax Efficient Structure. Notwithstanding anything contained herein or otherwise, the Settlement described herein shall be implemented through a tax-efficient structure to be agreed upon by the Parties.
View Source

Related to Tax Efficient Structure

  • Management Structure Describe the overall management approach toward planning and implementing the contract. Include an organization chart for the management of the contract, if awarded.

  • Payment Structure You must pay the fees listed on the relevant Services Order. Subscription payments will be structured differently based on the term you select from the three options below and the payment structure will be set forth in the Services Order. The fees identified in the Services Order are exclusive of shipping fees, and you will pay the shipping fees (if applicable) identified in the invoice.

  • Agreement Structure This Agreement includes Part 1 - General Terms, Part 2 - Country-unique Terms (if any), the LI, and the ▇▇▇ and is the complete agreement between Licensee and Lenovo regarding the use of the Program. It replaces any prior oral or written communications between Licensee and Lenovo concerning Licensee’s use of the Program. The terms of Part 2 may replace or modify those of Part 1. To the extent of any conflict, the LI prevails over both Parts.

  • Framework Management Structure The Supplier shall provide a suitably qualified nominated contact (the “Supplier Framework Manager”) who will take overall responsibility for delivering the Goods and/or Services required within this Framework Agreement, as well as a suitably qualified deputy to act in their absence. The Supplier shall put in place a structure to manage the Framework in accordance with Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators). A full governance structure for the Framework will be agreed between the Parties during the Framework Agreement implementation stage. Following discussions between the Parties following the Framework Commencement Date, the Authority shall produce and issue to the Supplier a draft Supplier Action Plan. The Supplier shall not unreasonably withhold its agreement to the draft Supplier Action Plan. The Supplier Action Plan shall, unless the Authority otherwise Approves, be agreed between the Parties and come into effect within two weeks from receipt by the Supplier of the draft Supplier Action Plan. The Supplier Action Plan shall be maintained and updated on an ongoing basis by the Authority. Any changes to the Supplier Action Plan shall be notified by the Authority to the Supplier. The Supplier shall not unreasonably withhold its agreement to any changes to the Supplier Action Plan. Any such changes shall, unless the Authority otherwise Approves, be agreed between the Parties and come into effect within two weeks from receipt by the Supplier of the Authority’s notification. Regular performance review meetings will take place at the Authority’s premises throughout the Framework Period and thereafter until the Framework Expiry Date (“Supplier Review Meetings”). The exact timings and frequencies of such Supplier Review Meetings will be determined by the Authority following the conclusion of the Framework Agreement. It is anticipated that the frequency of the Supplier Review Meetings will be once every month or less. The Parties shall be flexible about the timings of these meetings. The purpose of the Supplier Review Meetings will be to review the Supplier’s performance under this Framework Agreement and, where applicable, the Supplier’s adherence to the Supplier Action Plan. The agenda for each Supplier Review Meeting shall be set by the Authority and communicated to the Supplier in advance of that meeting. The Supplier Review Meetings shall be attended, as a minimum, by the Authority Representative(s) and the Supplier Framework Manager.

  • Master Feeder Structure If permitted by the 1940 Act, the Board of Trustees, by vote of a majority of the Trustees, and without a Shareholder vote, may cause the Trust or any one or more Series to convert to a master feeder structure (a structure in which a feeder fund invests all of its assets in a master fund, rather than making investments in securities directly) and thereby cause existing Series of the Trust to either become feeders in a master fund, or to become master funds in which other funds are feeders.