Use of Evaluation Results Sample Clauses

Use of Evaluation Results. Evaluation results shall be private and confidential and shall be used:
View SourceView Similar (9)
Use of Evaluation Results. Evaluation results shall be private and confidential and shall be used: 1. To document the satisfactory performance by an employee; 2. To identify area(s) for professional growth; and 3. To document performance by an employee judged to be unsatisfactory, based on established evaluation criteria.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Use of Evaluation Results. The District shall endeavor to keep evaluation results private and confidential to the extent allowed by law and in consideration of appropriate use of the evaluation materials which may include, but are not limited to, sharing them with District administrative staff, the Board and use in grievance and arbitration hearings. Evaluation results shall be used
View SourceView Similar (2)
Use of Evaluation Results. Evaluation results shall be private and confidential to the extent provided by the law, unless agreed upon to be shared with mentors, representation, other personnel, etc. and shall be used:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Use of Evaluation Results. ‌ 23 Evaluation results shall be private and confidential, provided that within the District the Reports shall 24 be shared only as specified by the employee or on a “professional need to know” basis; and outside the 25 District, the Reports shall be shared only as specified by the employee or as is legally required or 26 permitted. Further, they shall be used:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Use of Evaluation Results. Evaluation and observation results shall be private and confidential unless otherwise provided by law. All observations and evaluations shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file.
View Source
Use of Evaluation Results. 1. Evaluation results shall be used: a. To document the satisfactory performance by a teacher of his/her assigned duties; b. To identify area(s) for professional growth according to the criteria included on the evaluation instrument; c. To document performance by a teacher judged unsatisfactory, based on the adopted evaluation criteria. 2. Evaluation results shall not be: a. Shared or published with any teacher identifying information. b. Shared or published without notification to the individual and Association. c. Used to determine any type of base or additional compensation. 2757 2758 2759 2760 2761 2762 2763 2764 2765 d. Used as a form of progressive discipline.
View Source
Use of Evaluation Results. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Sepracor shall use Option Compound Information, Option Compounds, and Evaluation Results solely for the purpose of carrying out the Evaluation. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Sepracor agrees that after the Effective Date it shall not (i) use Option Compounds, Option Compound Information, or Evaluation Results received or generated by Sepracor pursuant to this Agreement in research that is subject to licensing, or similar obligations to any Third Party, (ii) disclose or transfer Option Compounds, Option Compound Information, or Evaluation Results to any Third Party without ACADIA’s prior written consent except as otherwise provided in Section 3.6 of this Agreement, (iii) develop, or attempt to develop, any Other Forms of any Option Compound; or (iv) except as otherwise provided in Section 9.3, file (or cause to be filed) any patent application anywhere in the world containing any Option Compound Information or any results of the Evaluation Studies, or that contains compound claims directed to any Option Compound or Other Forms thereof, or any method of use of any Option Compound or Other Forms thereof, without ACADIA’s prior written consent.
View Source

Related to Use of Evaluation Results

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.