Utilization Review Appeals Sample Clauses

The Utilization Review Appeals clause establishes a process for challenging decisions made during utilization reviews, which assess the necessity and appropriateness of healthcare services. Typically, this clause outlines the steps a patient or provider must follow to appeal a denial or limitation of coverage, such as submitting additional documentation or requesting a secondary review by an independent party. Its core function is to provide a formal mechanism for disputing adverse determinations, ensuring that patients have a fair opportunity to contest decisions that may affect their access to care.
Utilization Review Appeals. If you disagree with a treatment plan, or you are requesting experimental or investigational health care services our utilization review unit may be able to help. If we decide to deny coverage for a medical service you and your doctor asked for because it is an experimental or investigational health care service, you can ask Fidelis for an appeal. A. Standard Appeal A standard appeal must be filed by you or your representative, either in writing or by telephone, within 180 calendar days after you receive notice of the adverse determination. The Fidelis Utilization Review agent will send you a letter telling you that we know you have filed the appeal within fifteen (15) business days of your filing. Fidelis will make a decision on the appeal within sixty (30) days after receiving necessary information to conduct the appeal. The Fidelis Utilization Review agent will send you, your representative and, where appropriate, your doctor, a letter telling you about the appeal decision within two (2) business days of making this decision but no later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the appeal request . When Fidelis receives your request for an appeal, we will call your doctor or hospital to get the information we will need to review in order to take another look at your complaint. You will receive an answer from the Fidelis Chief Medical Officer within sixty (60) days. If we do not make a decision within 60 days, your request will be considered an adverse determination and be reviewed by using our internal appeal process. If we do not make a decision regarding your appeal within the required timeframes the initial denial will be reversed.
Utilization Review Appeals. (Expedited). Expedited or immediate appeals are available to the member, if he wants to appeal an adverse determination based upon medical necessity that involves: i. Continued or extended healthcare services; ii. Procedures, treatments or additional services for a member who is undergoing a course of continued treatment prescribed by his or her healthcare provider; or iii. A situation where the member's healthcare provider believes an immediate appeal is needed. However, this does not apply in situations where we originally paid the member's claim before we had all the information needed. We will reach a decision with regard to the expedited appeal, within two (2) business days of the time we receive all the necessary information we need to conduct the appeal. We will notify you immediately of our decision by telephone. We'll send a written notice within two (2) business days of the decision. If you do not receive a satisfactory answer through our expedited appeals process, you may use the standard appeal process described above or apply to New York State for an external appeal.

Related to Utilization Review Appeals

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Sub- scribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services under the plan. Blue Shield has completed documentation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required un- der Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review process, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.