VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA Clause Samples

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA. The contract being utilized as a part of the joint purchasing agreement has been advertised and awarded in accordance with the procurement procedures of the City of Chicago through a bid issued, March 3, 2009 and awarded under contract 19835 dated May 5, 2009 and extended through April 30, 2015 for the Maintenance, Repair, Purchase of UPS System and UPS Battery Systems and Supplies. Pursuant to State law, contracts for goods and services procured from another governmental entity are exempt from the District’s competitive bidding requirements.
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA a. Throughout the Agreement period the Vendor shall continue to comply with: (1) The selection criteria used during the Vendor’s successful selection; (2) Changes to the selection criteria adopted during the term of the Agreement; and (3) The requirement to maintain competitive prices within the Vendor’s peer group. b. The Department may assess the Vendor’s compliance with then current vendor selection criteria and current updated peer group prices at any time during the Agreement period; c. The Department may terminate the Agreement if the Vendor fails to meet the then current vendor selection criteria or current updated peer group prices.
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA a. The Department may reassess Vendor’s compliance with then current Vendor selection criteria and current updated peer group prices at any time during this Agreement. b. The Department may terminate this Agreement if Vendor fails to meet the then current Vendor selection criteria or current updated peer group prices.
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA. Authorized WIC Vendors must meet all LA WIC Vendor Selection Criteria and any Vendor Limiting Criteria, if applicable as well as Vendor Rules and Regulations (Provisions that control Vendor participation within LA WIC including but not limited to affirmations made in the Vendor Application and the Vendor Agreement, and federal and state rules, regulations, guidance and policy governing LA WIC as well as the Vendor Guide, Memorandums and the Policy Manual).
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA. Expiration of a contract or agreement with a food vendor is not subject to appeal.
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA. In accordance with sole source policy procedures, this service is exempt from the District’s competitive bidding process.
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA. The contract is being utilized as part of a joint purchasing agreement and awarded in accordance with the state procurement procedures, State of Illinois - CMS Joint Purchase Contract #4017340. Pursuant to State law, contracts for goods and services procured from another governmental entity are exempt from the District’s competitive bidding requirements.
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA. The vendor being utilized is part of our participation in various purchasing consortiums to leverage the aggregate purchasing power of the community colleges in Illinois. Pursuant to Board Report #29816 and #32583, the Board approved the use of the Sourcewell purchasing consortium (Contract 060920-NAF).
VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA a. Throughout the Agreement period the Vendor shall continue to comply with: (1) The selection criteria used during the Vendor’s successful selection; (2) Changes to the selection criteria adopted during the term of the Agreement; and

Related to VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria Post registration qualification in the area of specialty or evidence of significant progression towards one.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Target Population TREATMENT FOR ADULT (TRA) Target Population

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.