Waukegan Harbor [continued] Sample Clauses

Waukegan Harbor [continued]. Waukegan Harbor is the only Area of Concern (AOC) in Illinois and has the requirement for a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) under the Great Lakes water Quality Agreement that calls for removing the listed Beneficial Use Impairments. Contaminated sediments are a major impediment to delisting Waukegan Harbor as a Great Lakes AOC and may directly impact the following beneficial use impairments: restrictions on dredging, restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption, and degradation of benthos. Efforts for U.S. EPA, Illinois EPA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and local stakeholders to cooperate on a sediment remediation project in Waukegan Harbor under the Great Lakes Legacy Act have stalled and either the Water Resources Development Act or Superfund provide the other potential program opportunity of federal funds to assist in remediation of Waukegan Harbor. Result: Illinois EPA continues work with U.S. EPA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and local stakeholders to determine feasible and appropriate remediation actions for the restoration of the beneficial uses of Waukegan Harbor. During 2006 and 2007, Illinois EPA Bureau of Water and Bureau of Land technical staff have actively engaged in monthly to bi-weekly stakeholders calls to formulate project options, provide feedback on state regulatory requirements and develop a strategy to secure funding of the non-federal cost share. Illinois EPA technical staff have reviewed and provided feedback for numerous documents and proposals. In February of 2007, The Waukegan Harbor Sediment Remediation proposal passed the GLLA Stage 1 review, and the City of Waukegan gave an oral presentation of the project to the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on February 27, 2007. In March of 2007, the TRC unanimously recommended that U.S. EPA pursue a Project Agreement (PA) for engineering design for the Waukegan Harbor Sediment Remediation project. Illinois EPA Bureau of Water and Bureau of Land technical staff participated in the development of the project conceptual plan in a meeting at Waukegan City Hall on March 23, 2007. In July 2007, the City of Waukegan and USEPA did not sign a GLLA project agreement. Under the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration all AOCs must have targets set for the delisting process. Illinois EPA, in partnership with federal, state and local partners, will develop delisting targets for the AOC. Illinois EPA staff continues to provide project updates to the community at the monthly meetings of the Waukegan H...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Waukegan Harbor [continued]. Waukegan Harbor is one of 31 Areas of Concern (AOCs) in the United States. The AOC includes the harbor, industrial, commercial, municipal, and open and vacant lands. Of the 14 beneficial use impairments recognized by the International Joint Commission (IJC), six have been identified for the Waukegan Harbor AOC, including: (1) restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption; (2) beach closings; (3) degradation of phytoplankton and zooplankton populations;
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Waukegan Harbor [continued]

  • Commencement and Continuation The Contractor shall commence the Project on the date the Contract was signed by the Department (as above) and, subject to Schedule Three, Clause 10.1 shall complete the Project on or before 1 June 2012. Interpretations Schedule One Schedule Two Schedule Three

  • Formation and Continuation The Partnership is a limited partnership heretofore formed and continued pursuant to the provisions of the Act and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement. Except as expressly provided herein to the contrary, the rights and obligations of the Partners and the administration and termination of the Partnership shall be governed by the Act. The Partnership Interest of each Partner shall be personal property for all purposes.

  • Benefits Continuation In addition, Executive shall be entitled to health and dental insurance benefits for a period of eighteen (18) months following the termination of this Agreement. These benefits will be provided at Employer’s expense, but such period shall count towards the Employer’s continuation of coverage obligation under Section 4980B of the Internal Revenue Code (commonly referred to as “COBRA”).

  • Regulatory Good Standing Certification - Explanation - Continued If Vendor responded to the prior attribute that "No", Vendor is not in good standing, Vendor must provide an explanation of that lack of good standing here for TIPS consideration.

  • Business Continuity Planning Supplier shall prepare and maintain at no additional cost to Buyer a Business Continuity Plan (“BCP”). Upon written request of Buyer, Supplier shall provide a copy of Supplier’s BCP. The BCP shall be designed to ensure that Supplier can continue to provide the goods and/or services in accordance with this Order in the event of a disaster or other BCP-triggering event (as such events are defined in the applicable BCP). Supplier’s BCP shall, at a minimum, provide for: (a) the retention and retrieval of data and files; (b) obtaining resources necessary for recovery, (c) appropriate continuity plans to maintain adequate levels of staffing required to provide the goods and services during a disruptive event; (d) procedures to activate an immediate, orderly response to emergency situations; (e) procedures to address potential disruptions to Supplier’s supply chain; (f) a defined escalation process for notification of Buyer, within two (2) business days, in the event of a BCP-triggering event; and (g) training for key Supplier Personnel who are responsible for monitoring and maintaining Supplier’s continuity plans and records. Supplier shall maintain the BCP and test it at least annually or whenever there are material changes in Supplier’s operations, risks or business practices. Upon ▇▇▇▇▇’s written and reasonable request, Supplier shall provide Buyer an executive summary of test results and a report of corrective actions (including the timing for implementation) to be taken to remedy any deficiencies identified by such testing. Upon ▇▇▇▇▇’s request and with reasonable advance notice and conducted in such a manner as not to unduly interfere with Supplier’s operations, Supplier shall give Buyer and its designated agents access to Supplier’s designated representative(s) with detailed functional knowledge of Supplier’s BCP and relevant subject matter.