Admission Procedure and Criteria Clause Samples

Admission Procedure and Criteria. The students will be recruited either by ULILLE or TU before the beginning of either the second year master programme or the second semester of the first year master programme. The language of the two diplomas is English. Within each Institution selection criteria will be in place to ensure that the capacities and potential of each candidate will enable them to make progress and succeed within an international university context. Candidates with or preparing a bachelor degree or equivalent diploma (validated by the expected home Institution) of at least 180 ECTS or the equivalent units in biology or biotechnology (notions in biology expected) and a strong motivation to participate to the success of the partnership are invited to apply. Complete Admission procedure and forms (in English) are made available by partners to all potential candidates through their website. Application forms include: a motivational letter, one letter of reference; copies of all University-level diplomas; up-to-date authenticated transcripts with results of previous University-level courses; and official documentation from the student’s current university confirming they are enrolled and expected to finalize their course at the end of the current academic year. Motivational letters should include a short research project and its relevance with the Institutions scientific staff (preliminary contact with potential supervisors is encouraged). All documents should be written or officially translated to English. In addition, all students are expected to have an acceptable skill-level in spoken and written (scientific) English. An appropriate knowledge of English can also be demonstrated through internationally recognized qualifications (e.g. TOEFL, TOEIC). European level B2 will be required. Students should also make sure they meet the admission criteria of the partners Institutions and immigration law in France and Japan. Coordinators will decide deadlines for application in order to ensure the recruitment procedures as defined in both Institutions. They will evaluate the application in coordination with the local board of involved programme and inform the partner coordinator of pre-selection results. The latter will, in turn, evaluate the application with the local board of involved programme in partner Institution. If necessary, video-transmitted interview of candidate(s) can be organized on demand of at least one of the coordinators or boards. The selection criteria are common to a...
View Source
Admission Procedure and Criteria. The students enrolling to the Dual Master Degree Program will be recruited, separately, by UniCa and TMU. The students should express the intent to be enrolled into the Dual Master Degree Program at the latest by the end of their 1st year and follow the application submission deadline. The language of both degrees is English. Within each institution, the selection criteria will be in place to ensure that the capacities and potential of each candidate, once recruited, will enable them to make progress and succeed within an international academic context. Students participating in the Dual Master Degree Program from UniCa or TMU are selected and recommended by each institution according to their own regulations. All students are expected to have a skill-level in spoken and written (scientific) English corresponding to the European level B2 or above before departure. The required English level can also be demonstrated through other internationally recognized qualifications (e.g. IELTS). From the signed date of this Agreement, the maximum number of students enrolled in the program will be 2 from each institution per year. This number may be revised every year at the request of one or both of the partner institutions. If it is not revised, the number will remain as stated in the present Agreement, for the entire duration of the Agreement.
View Source
Admission Procedure and Criteria. The students will be recruited jointly by HIT and Lille. Within each institution selection criteria will be in place to ensure that the capacities and potential of each candidate will enable them to make progress and succeed within an international university context. Each student must submit an application portfolio including: - an application form - details of his/her academic background, - his/her academic results, - a Curriculum Vitae, - a letter of motivation, - a certificate confirming the applicant’s level in English and sciences. Eligible candidates will then be called for interview at HIT, with a Lille1 representative present if possible. An Internet exam could be set up between the two institutions. Following the final decision, a letter of acceptance will be sent to the successful candidate. As the second year of Master ASE (speciality E2SD) is totally taught in English, Lille 1 retains the right to refuse any student whose level in English is not considered acceptable (B2 level). If necessary, video-transmitted interview of candidate(s) can be organized on demand of at least one of the coordinators or boards. A notification of selection results should be made in accordance with the application procedures of each Institution. The selected students will then be personally contacted by the coordinator of the expected host Institution.
View Source
Admission Procedure and Criteria. The students will be recruited jointly by LILLE 1 and KGU. Within each institution selection criteria will be in place to ensure that the capacities and potential of each candidate will enable them to make due progress and succeed within an international university context. Each student must submit an application portfolio including: • An application form • Details of his/her academic background • His/her academic results • A Curriculum Vitae • A letter of motivation • A certificate confirming the applicant’s level in English In the first year of implementation, eEligible candidates will be screened and selected by KGU and nominated to LILLE 1, without the need for interview by LILLE 1. However, in subsequent years. aAn interview process by both institutions may be implemented if both sides agree. Following LILLE 1’s decision, a letter of acceptance will be sent to the successful candidate. A notification of selection results should be made in accordance with the application procedures of each Institution. The selected students will then be personally contacted by the coordinator of the expected host Institution.
View Source

Related to Admission Procedure and Criteria

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ARBITRATION 8.01 Any employee or the Union has the right to lodge a grievance with respect to any matter arising out of the interpretation, application or alleged violation of this Agreement. 8.02 At the time formal discipline is imposed or at any stage of the grievance procedure, including the complaint stage, a nurse is entitled to be represented by her/his union representative. In the case of suspension or discharge, the Employer shall notify the nurse of this right in advance. The Employer also agrees, as a good labour relations practice, it will also notify the Bargaining Unit. 8.03 It is the intent of the parties that complaints of employees shall be adjusted as quickly as possible, and it is understood that the Union has no grievance concerning an individual nurse until the Director of Care or her/his designate has been given an opportunity of adjusting the complaint. Such complaint shall be discussed with the Director of Care within fifteen (15) working days after the circumstances giving rise to it have occurred. This discussion may include consultation, advice and assistance from others. If there is no settlement within nine (9) working days, it shall then be taken up as a grievance within nine (9) working days in the following manner and sequence: The Union may present the grievance to the Administrator, or her/his designate, who shall render her/his decision within five (5) working days after the presentation of the grievance to her/him. The parties may, if they so desire, meet to discuss the grievance at a time and place suitable to both parties. If the decision is unsatisfactory, then the grievance may be presented in the following manner: Within ten (10) working days after the decision is given at Step No. 1, the aggrieved employee, and/or the Grievance Committee shall meet with a committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Manor to consider the grievance. At this stage the employee and/or the Grievance Committee may be accompanied by a representative of the Union. The decision of the committee of the Board of Directors will be rendered in writing to the Labour Relations Officer and the bargaining unit representative within ten (10) working days following such a meeting.

  • Review and Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation (i) to determine whether a Delinquency Trigger has occurred, (ii) to determine whether the required percentage of Noteholders has voted to direct a Review, (iii) to determine which Receivables are subject to a Review, (iv) to obtain or confirm the validity of the Review Materials, (v) to obtain missing or insufficient Review Materials (except to the extent set forth in Section 3.04), or (vi) to take any action or cause any other party to take any action under any of the Basic Documents to enforce any remedies for breaches of any Eligible Representations. The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the Tests provided in Exhibit A and will have no obligation to perform additional testing procedures on any ARR Receivables or to consider any additional information provided by any party. The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation to provide reporting or information in addition to that described in Section 3.07. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may review and report on additional information that it determines in good faith to be material to its performance under this ARR Agreement and may re-perform a Review with respect to an ARR Receivable as contemplated by Section 3.09. The Issuing Entity expressly agrees that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not advising the Issuing Entity or any Noteholder or any investor or future investor concerning the suitability of the Notes or any investment strategy. The Issuing Entity expressly acknowledges and agrees that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not an expert in accounting, tax, regulatory, or legal matters, and that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not providing legal advice as to any matter.

  • Claims Procedure and Arbitration In the event a dispute arises over benefits under this Executive Plan and benefits are not paid to the Executive (or to the Executive's beneficiary(ies) in the case of the Executive's death) and such claimants feel they are entitled to receive such benefits, then a written claim must be made to the Named Fiduciary and Plan Administrator named above within sixty (60) days from the date payments are refused. The Named Fiduciary and Plan Administrator shall review the written claim and if the claim is denied, in whole or in part, they shall provide in writing within sixty (60) days of receipt of such claim the specific reasons for such denial, reference to the provisions of this Executive Plan upon which the denial is based and any additional material or information necessary to perfect the claim. Such written notice shall further indicate the additional steps to be taken by claimants if a further review of the claim denial is desired. A claim shall be deemed denied if the Named Fiduciary and Plan Administrator fail to take any action within the aforesaid sixty-day period. If claimants desire a second review they shall notify the Named Fiduciary and Plan Administrator in writing within sixty (60) days of the first claim denial. Claimants may review this Executive Plan or any documents relating thereto and submit any written issues and comments it may feel appropriate. In their sole discretion, the Named Fiduciary and Plan Administrator shall then review the second claim and provide a written decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of such claim. This decision shall likewise state the specific reasons for the decision and shall include reference to specific provisions of the Plan Agreement upon which the decision is based. If claimants continue to dispute the benefit denial based upon completed performance of this Executive Plan or the meaning and effect of the terms and conditions thereof, then claimants may submit the dispute to an arbitrator for final arbitration. The arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the Bank and the claimants. The arbitrator shall operate under any generally recognized set of arbitration rules. The parties hereto agree that they and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns shall be bound by the decision of such arbitrator with respect to any controversy properly submitted to it for determination. Where a dispute arises as to the Bank's discharge of the Executive "for cause," such dispute shall likewise be submitted to arbitration as above described and the parties hereto agree to be bound by the decision thereunder.

  • Disputes Resolution Procedure 11.1 A major objective of this Agreement is to eliminate lost time and/or production arising out of disputes or grievances. The Parties to this Agreement are committed to complying with the terms of this procedure.

  • Dispute Resolution Procedures (a) In the event a dispute arises about the interpretation, application, calculation of Loss, or calculation of payments or otherwise with respect to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item”), then the Receiver and the Assuming Institution shall make every attempt in good faith to resolve such items within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a written description of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item, with notification of the possibility of taking the matter to arbitration (the date on which such 60-day period expires, or any extension of such period as the parties hereto may mutually agree to in writing, herein called the “Resolution Deadline Date”). If the Receiver and the Assuming Institution resolve all such items to their mutual satisfaction by the Resolution Deadline Date, then within thirty (30) days following such resolution, any payment due as a result of such resolution shall be made arising from the settlement of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute. (b) If the Receiver and the Assuming Institution fail to resolve any outstanding SF Shared-Loss Dispute Items by the Resolution Deadline Date, then either party may notify the other of its intent to submit the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item to arbitration pursuant to the provisions of this Article VII. Failure of either party to submit pursuant to paragraph (c) hereof any unresolved SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item to arbitration within thirty (30) days following the Resolution Deadline Date (the date on which such thirty (30) day period expires is herein called the “Arbitration Deadline Date”) shall extinguish that party’s right to submit the non-submitted SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item to arbitration, and constitute a waiver of the submitting party’s right to dispute such non-submitted SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item (but not a waiver of any similar claim which may arise in the future). (c) If a SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item is submitted to arbitration, it shall be governed by the rules of the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”), except as otherwise provided herein. Either party may submit a matter for arbitration by delivering a notice, prior to the Arbitration Deadline Date, to the other party in writing setting forth: (i) A brief description of each SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item submitted for arbitration; (ii) A statement of the moving party’s position with respect to each SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item submitted for arbitration; (iii) The value sought by the moving party, or other relief requested regarding each SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item submitted for arbitration, to the extent reasonably calculable; and (iv) The name and address of the arbiter selected by the moving party (the “Moving Arbiter”), who shall be a neutral, as determined by the AAA. Failure to adequately include any information above shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the parties right to arbitrate so long as after notification of such failure the moving party cures such failure as promptly as reasonably practicable. (d) The non-moving party shall, within thirty (30) days following receipt of a notice of arbitration pursuant to this Section 7.1, deliver a notice to the moving party setting forth: (i) The name and address of the arbiter selected by the non-moving party (the “Respondent Arbiter”), who shall be a neutral, as determined by the AAA; (ii) A statement of the position of the respondent with respect to each Dispute Item; and (iii) The ultimate resolution sought by the respondent or other relief, if any, the respondent deems is due the moving party with respect to each SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item. Failure to adequately include any information above shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the non-moving party’s right to defend such arbitration so long as after notification of such failure the non-moving party cures such failure as promptly as reasonably practicable (e) The Moving Arbiter and Respondent Arbiter shall select a third arbiter from a list furnished by the AAA. In accordance with the rules of the AAA, the three (3) arbiters shall constitute the arbitration panel for resolution of each SF Loss-Share Dispute Item. The concurrence of any two (2) arbiters shall be deemed to be the decision of the arbiters for all purposes hereunder. The arbitration shall proceed on such time schedule and in accordance with the Rules of Commercial Arbitration of the AAA then in effect, as modified by this Section 7.1. The arbitration proceedings shall take place at such location as the parties thereto may mutually agree, but if they cannot agree, then they will take place at the offices of the Corporation in Washington, DC, or Arlington, Virginia. (f) The Receiver and Assuming Institution shall facilitate the resolution of each outstanding SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item by making available in a prompt and timely manner to one another and to the arbiters for examination and copying, as appropriate, all documents, books, and records under their respective control and that would be discoverable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.