Alternative Evaluation Procedure Clause Samples

Alternative Evaluation Procedure. 1. A permanent unit member with a minimum of five (5) years in the District may, with the mutual agreement of the certificated evaluator he/she has chosen, elect to participate in the alternative evaluation process subject to the following conditions: a. The unit member must have had evaluation ratings of “Proficient” or above over the course of the last five years. b. The unit member will have designated either one or two evaluation partners to work with during the process who also meet the eligibility criteria. c. The alternative evaluation process is available no more than once every four years for qualifying evaluatees. d. Evaluatee notifies his/her evaluator of their intent to use the alternative evaluation process by the end of the 4th week of the school year or on the date of the agreed evaluation calendar for that year. The evaluator’s response shall be given by the end of the 5th week. 2. At a pre-evaluation conference held in compliance with the District’s evaluation calendar for the year, the peer evaluators and their evaluating administrator shall meet, discuss, and mutually agree upon the evaluation plan including constrains. Evaluatees and evaluator will mutually agree on scheduled updates (if any) during the year.
View Source
Alternative Evaluation Procedure. 17.4.1 The District and the Association share the belief that offering alternatives to the traditional evaluation system will improve excellence in instruction by promoting the professional growth of experienced teachers. 17.4.1.1 Participants 17.4.1.1.1 The following certificated personnel will be eligible to participate in an alternate evaluation system: a) All permanent certificated employees who have worked for the District six consecutive years and who have received two satisfactory evaluations (excluding probationary evaluations) and with agreement by the site administrator may participate in the alternative evaluation process. b) Participation will be voluntary by the permanent certificated unit member with the approval of the site administrator. c) There will be no limit on the number of participants at each site. d) The alternative evaluation option, if mutually agreed upon between the evaluatee and the site administrator, shall take the place of the traditional evaluation methods as outlined in Article 17 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement. 17.4.1.1.2 (a) Teachers whose participation in the alternative evaluation program is judged to detract from the teacher’s instructional and professional performance may be returned, during the following evaluation period to the traditional evaluation process, whereby the unit member will not be evaluated that next year, unless they have received an unsatisfactory evaluation under the alternative evaluation process, as outlined in Article 17 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the District and HTA. The administrator must specify to the affected teacher, in writing, the reasons for the evaluation reassignment. 17.4.1.1.3 (b) A unit member may request to have the alternative evaluation process be extended beyond the current evaluation year when the unit member can demonstrate good cause for that extension. The extension request must be approved by the site administrator and the Superintendent.
View Source
Alternative Evaluation Procedure 
View Source

Related to Alternative Evaluation Procedure

  • Evaluation Procedure 6.1.1 The established evaluation form is to be prepared by the immediate supervisor under whom the bargaining unit member has served for sixty (60) working days or more. (See evaluation form attached as Appendix B.) The immediate supervisor is to present a draft of an evaluation report to the bargaining unit member in private and discuss the report with the bargaining unit member being evaluated. The evaluation shall be based upon direct observation by the immediate supervisor or verified facts. Evaluation reports reflecting “Needs Improvement” or “Does not meet standards” ratings shall include statements of deficiencies and recommendations for improvements, in writing, by the evaluator. The signature by the bargaining unit member does not indicate the employee’s agreement with the ratings; it indicates that the employee has received a copy. 6.1.1.1 Permanent employees shall be evaluated annually. 6.1.1.2 Probationary employees shall be evaluated at least once during the probationary period, prior to the end of the fourth month. 6.1.2 Evaluation reports reflecting “Needs Improvement” or “Does Not Meet Standards” ratings shall be placed in the bargaining unit member’s personnel file only after written notification by the supervisor that the bargaining unit member has been given an opportunity to prepare a written response to such evaluation. Prior to evaluation reports reflecting any “Needs Improvement” or “Does Not Meet Standards” ratings the evaluator is encouraged to implement a Performance Improvement Plan. (See Performance Improvement Plan form attached as Appendix C.) 6.1.3 A bargaining unit member has the right to attach a response to the employee’s evaluation provided that such written response is submitted to the employee's supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the employee's receipt of the evaluation. Any timely received response shall be attached to, and become a permanent part of, the employee's evaluation. 6.1.4 Evaluatees may, within ten (10) working days, present the employee’s objections to the evaluation decision to the Director Personnel Services. Grounds for the objections shall be based on one or more of the following: (1) the evaluation was not based on fact; (2) the evaluation was based on discriminatory standards; (3) the evaluation was not conducted in conformance with this Article. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of such objection the Director Personnel Services shall hear the objections and render a decision whether to uphold the evaluation or rescind the evaluation. 6.1.5 The bargaining unit member's supervisor may, at any time, prepare a notice of commendation. The completed form is to be signed by the bargaining unit member to indicate receipt and the bargaining unit member shall be given a signed copy. The original notice is to be forwarded to the Personnel Services Office for filing. 6.1.6 Contents of evaluations are not subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement, Article VII, but procedural violations are subject to the grievance procedure. 6.1.7 The probation period shall be defined as the initial six (6) month employment period. 6.1.8 In the event a permanent bargaining unit member is hired for a new position, and is subsequently released from probation under section 6.1.7, the employee will be returned to the employee’s previous classification. 6.1.9 The District, CSEA and the bargaining unit member may mutually agree to extend the probationary period of a bargaining unit member on an individual basis provided the extension is no longer than four (4) months.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5. 10.2.4.2 In filling a posted vacancy, first consideration shall be given to internal applicants who meet the stated qualifications. All Faculty members who meet the stated qualifications for the posted vacancy shall be interviewed by the Selection Committee. Past service and evaluations shall be considered by the Committee. The best qualified candidate shall be recommended for appointment to the position. 10.2.4.3 Where the qualifications of two or more of the applicants are relatively equal, the applicant with the greatest seniority shall be recommended for appointment to the position. 10.2.4.4 In establishing the qualifications, and in evaluating the qualifications and past performance of the applicants, the committee shall act in good faith, in a fair and reasonable manner, and shall not act in an arbitrary or discriminatory fashion. 10.2.4.5 Following the interviews, the committee will submit its recommendations containing a list of qualified candidates in order of preference, through the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ to the President or delegate. 10.2.4.6 New faculty members shall be appointed only when there are no qualified internal applicants. 10.2.4.7 If there are no qualified internal applicants, the selection committee may consider external applications, in accordance with the procedure outlined above. 10.2.4.8 Internal applicants will be advised as soon as possible of the selection committee's decision that the committee will be considering external applications in accordance with Article 10.2.4.7.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Verification Procedure (1) The signature file of each processed file is validated. (2) If processed files are pieces of a bigger file, the latter is put together. (3) Each file obtained in the previous step is then decrypted and uncompressed. (4) Each data file contained in the previous step is then validated against the format defined in Part A, Section 9, reference 1 of this Specification. (5) If Part A, Section 9, reference 1 of this Specification includes a verification process, that will be applied at this step. If any discrepancy is found in any of the steps, the Deposit will be considered incomplete.

  • Notification Procedure (i) Each such notice shall be deemed to have been delivered: (A) when presented personally to the GOB; (B) when transmitted by facsimile; or (C) five (5) Days after being deposited in a regularly maintained receptacle for the postal service in Bangladesh, postage prepaid, registered or certified, return receipt requested, addressed to the GOB, at the address indicated in Section 17 of the Implementation Agreement (or such other address as the GOB may have specified by written notice delivered in accordance therewith). Any notice given by facsimile under this Section 4.6 shall be confirmed in writing delivered personally or sent by prepaid post, but failure to so confirm shall not void or invalidate the original notice if it is in fact received by the GOB.