Authority and Decision Making Sample Clauses

Authority and Decision Making. The FSC shall act by consensus. The representatives from each Party will have, collectively, one (1) vote on behalf of that Party. If the FSC cannot reach consensus on an issue that comes before the FSC and over which the FSC has oversight, then the Parties shall refer such matter to the China Committee for resolution in accordance with Section 2.2(e). The FSC shall have no power to amend, modify, or waive compliance with Exhibit D or this Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Authority and Decision Making. 3.1 The Alliance Board will have delegated authority arising from its members to approve or reject items presented for consideration within the authority delegated to the members from their employing Party. In order to be binding on the Parties, the decisions of the Alliance Provider Board will need to be made by consensus, i.e. all four parties to the alliance must agree. 3.2 It will be for each of the Parties to identify their executive level representative and delegate authority to make decisions on behalf of that Party to that representative, within the scope of their role and as defined by that Party and as restricted by its scheme of delegation and schedule of reserved matters. 3.3 The members of the Alliance Provider Board will be responsible for reporting decisions made by the Board and any obstacles to decision making to their appointing Party through established assurance processes. Each Party will put in place arrangements for the feedback loop into their assurance processes and notify the other Parties the basis on which its member reports back to it. 3.4 The Alliance Provider Board will operate within each parties procurement and contracting procedure rules.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Authority and Decision Making. While the primary responsibility of the project rests with the funded Recipient, the PCG is comprised of relevant parties, with appropriate experience, to provide strategic direction and advice.
View Source
Authority and Decision Making. The following table outlines the scope of authority and decision making of the various committees, teams and working groups described in the governance framework. Any decision made by a governance committee that is within the operating mandate of that committee will be: • made by the mutual consensus of the Province committee members on the one hand, and the Contractor committee members on the other hand; and • binding upon the parties (unless decided otherwise by a committee having authority to do so). Decisions that extend beyond the mandate of the committee will be escalated to the next appropriate committee as indicated in this Schedule, and where no such committee is indicated, to the Joint Executive Committee. All decisions made by the committees will, where appropriate, follow the Change Order Process. All decisions will be recorded in meeting minutes and a notice of each decision will be sent to affected parties. GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS ON ISSUES Joint Relationship Sponsors For the Province – the Assistant Deputy Minister – Knowledge Management and Technology For the Contractor – the Senior Vice President – Western Canada Issues that significantly impact the health of the relationship between the parties Joint Executive Committee (JEC) Issues that significantly impact: - Scope - Transition - Timeframes - Budget Allocation - Stakeholder relations Official Plans and Priorities Issues impacting the parties including: - Legislative - Policy - Privacy and security - Issues escalated from the Joint Management Committee Contractor and Province Service Level Appeals Joint Management Committee (JMC) Issues that impact: - Scope, including new project approvals and changes to Service Descriptions - Timeframes - Budget Management - Stakeholder Relations - Performance and Service Levels - Resource sufficiency and availability - CITS relationship Issues escalated from JOC, Working Groups, Project and/or Operational Teams . GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS ON ISSUES Risk mitigation strategies Joint Operations Committee (JOC) Issues that impact: - Day-to-day operations - Operational change management - Problem and incident review and follow-up - Performance and Service Levels Working Groups Review, assess, provide input, and advice regarding issues (no decision making authority unless delegated). Project and Operational Teams Day to day decisions and issue resolution for items within the scope of their respective mandates a...
View Source

Related to Authority and Decision Making

  • Decision Making The Joint Development Committee and Joint Commercialization Committee shall each act by unanimous agreement of its members, with each Party having one vote. If the Joint Development Committee or Joint Commercialization Committee, after [* * *] (or such other period as the Parties may otherwise agree) of good faith efforts to reach a unanimous decision on an issue, fails to reach such a unanimous decision, then either Party may refer such issue to the Executive Officers. Such Executive Officers shall meet promptly thereafter and shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the issues. If Executive Officers cannot resolve such issue within [* * *] of referral of such issue to the Executive Officers, the resolution of such issue shall be as follows: (a) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Development Committee, determined by the Developing Party of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product at issue; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) if Acceleron is the Developing Party and such issue relates to (x) the approval of an Additional Development Disease, or (y) matters under Section 5.6.3(d), then such issue shall be determined by [* * *]; (ii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the Joint Development Committee’s decision to go forward with a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product; provided that [* * *] shall continue to determine any issues that relate to the budget for and the conduct of the [* * *]; and (iii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the occurrence of any [* * *]; and (b) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Commercialization Committee, determined by Celgene. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Acceleron, Celgene, the Joint Development Committee or the Joint Commercialization Committee may make any decision inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement without the prior written consent of each Party.

  • Decision-Making Authority BMS shall have the sole decision-making authority for the operations and Commercialization strategies and decisions, including funding and resourcing, related to the Commercialization of Products; provided that such decisions are not inconsistent with the express terms and conditions of this Agreement, including BMS’ diligence obligations set forth in Section 5.1.

  • AUTHORITY AND PARTIES In accordance with the National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)), this Agreement is entered into by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, located at ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (hereinafter referred to as "NASA") and PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY located at ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-0519 (hereinafter referred to as "Partner" or "PVAMU"). NASA and Partner may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties."

  • Authority and Purpose Pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 9410, the GMCB maintains certain health care claims and eligibility data within VHCURES to enable it to carry out its statutory duties, including A. determining the capacity and distribution of existing resources; identifying health care needs and informing health care policy; B. evaluating the effectiveness of intervention programs on improving patient outcomes; C. comparing costs between various treatment settings and approaches; D. providing information to consumers and purchasers of health care; and E. improving the quality and affordability of patient health care and health care coverage. To the extent allowed by HIPAA, the GMCB seeks to make some of this data available as a resource for individuals and entities to continuously review health care utilization, expenditures, and performance in Vermont. The purpose of this Agreement is to specify the conditions under which the GMCB will release VHCURES data, and to ensure that the data is accessed, maintained, used, and disclosed in compliance with all applicable statutory, regulatory, and contractual requirements.

  • Governing Law, Regulatory Authority, and Rules The validity, interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement and each of its provisions shall be governed by the laws of the state of New York, without regard to its conflicts of law principles. This Agreement is subject to all Applicable Laws and Regulations. Each Party expressly reserves the right to seek changes in, appeal, or otherwise contest any laws, orders, or regulations of a Governmental Authority.