Built Heritage Sample Clauses

Built Heritage. 11.8.2.1 Grave G1 is situated near the toll plaza, as shown in Figure 11.4b. The design of the toll plaza has been arranged so as to preserve the grave in-situ, with a minimum 1.0m permanent setback provided. With the 1.0m set back of the permanent structure, a minimum of 0.7m clearance from the grave can be maintained during construction. This will be achieved with the adoption of special precautionary measures for working adjacent to the grave, including the deployment of simple-to-erect formwork and falsework systems, the provision of construction access and the bulky components of the falsework support system being designed at locations away from the grave. The required construction clearance and the precautionary measures shall be stipulated in the construction specifications. The detailed design will be audited to ensure inclusion of the buffer zone and the implementation will be audited during construction of the toll plaza. The footpath connection from the adjacent Lung Mun Road to the grave will, also, be maintained during construction and reprovided after the works have been completed. No mitigation will be required during the operational phase. 11.8.2.2 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ G2 (27.5m from the nearest works), G3 (17.5m from the nearest works), G4 (78.9m from the nearest works), G5 (74.8m from the nearest works) and shrine TH-1 (147.3m from the nearest works) are all situated at sufficient distances away and will not be adversely impacted by the project. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required for these resources.
View Source
Built Heritage. Where the Project affects Listed Buildings/Structures and Conservation Areas the Project shall be executed by the Contractor/subcontractor to ensure impact is minimised. Where appropriate, the Contractor/sub-contractor shall ensure that the necessary consents are obtained prior to work starting.
View Source
Built Heritage. A desk-based study and a built heritage field survey have been conducted and revealed several heritage resources associated with the former Kai Tak Airport, which include two wind poles, the airport pier, Fire Station A, Fire Station B (and associated pier), Fire Station C, seawall and the runway, the Old Far East Flying Training School, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Toi Inscription Rock, Fish Tail Rock, and Kowloon Rock. The heritage significance of the Old Far East Flying Training School and Fish Tail Rock are moderate. The heritage significance of the ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Toi Inscription Rock is high. The heritage significance of the other examined heritage resources are low. No mitigation is required for the examined heritage resources except appropriate protective measures for the structures within the site of Old Far East Flying Training School during any laying of services in its vicinity and protective measures for the ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Toi Inscription Rock in case of relocation.
View Source
Built Heritage. The reclamation works and the subsequent development would not affect any built heritage directly. However, the only graded historic building known in the Study Area - ▇▇▇ Ancestral Hall in Tuk ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ - may be affected by the large scale development within existing villages. It is recommended to retain the graded historic building onsite with sufficient buffer from the works.
View Source
Built Heritage. The proposed development responds positively to the townscape and would respect the setting of the emerging developments to the north and south, without appearing overly assertive or dominant. The tallest elements are positioned in the south of the site and are considered sufficiently distant from the Grade II listed Television Centre, preserving its setting. It is considered that the proposed development, would cause no harm to the character or appearance of the Wood Lane conservation area and setting of the nearby listed and locally listed buildings and nearby conservation areas in H&F. The proposed development would be visible from within the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The impact of the proposal on the historic significance, visual amenity, character, appearance and setting of these assets, in particular Oxford Gardens/St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Conservation Area; Grade I listed Kensal Green Park (Kensal Green Cemetery); and listed buildings in RBKC, is considered to be negligible. In coming to a view on the heritage impacts, officers have given due regard in any case, to the significant townscape, urban design and regeneration benefits of the proposals. The proposed development is therefore considered to be acceptable and would be in accordance with policies 7.4, 7.7 and 7.8 of the London Plan (2016), Local Plan policies WCRA, WCRA1, DC1, DC2, DC3 and DC8 and the Council's Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document 2018 and White City Opportunity Area Planning Framework (2013).
View Source

Related to Built Heritage

  • Professional Improvement Leave A teacher may be granted leave to be used for the teacher's professional improvement. Professional improvement days may be approved by the superintendent and used for the purpose of: 1. Visitation to view other instructional techniques or programs. 2. Conferences, workshops, or seminars conducted by colleges, universities, or vocational schools. The teacher planning to use a professional improvement day shall notify the principal at least one week in advance of the proposed absence. The teacher shall be required to file a written report with the principal within one (1) week of attendance at such event. Also, the teacher may/shall be requested to return with materials and/or information to be shared with other teachers. The expense of attending such visitation, conference, workshop, or seminar will be paid by the Board when the proper reimbursement applications are sent to the district office. In cases where attendance at a convention, workshop, seminar, or other educational activity is deemed to be of value only to the individual teacher, leave may be granted for attendance with either no expenses or limited expenses being underwritten by the district. In these cases, no written or verbal reports will be required.

  • Fish and Wildlife Service 2002c. Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Colorado Squawfish Recovery Plan.

  • The Front end Fee payable by the Borrower shall be equal to one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the Loan amount.

  • No Legal Advice From the Company The Investor acknowledges that it had the opportunity to review this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement with his or its own legal counsel and investment and tax advisors. The Investor is relying solely on such counsel and advisors and not on any statements or representations of the Company or any of its representatives or agents for legal, tax or investment advice with respect to this investment, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the securities laws of any jurisdiction.

  • CONSULTATION REGARDING MAJOR WORKPLACE CHANGE 8.1 Consultation Prior to a Definite Decision Being Made (a) Where an Employer is considering making a decision to introduce major change, the Employer may choose to discuss with the Employees who may be affected and their Employee representative/s, which may include the Union/s, prior to making the decision to introduce change. (b) It is agreed that Employees may be able to offer valuable solutions and/or alternative solutions before major changes are made. (c) Where an Employer chooses to consult with Employees who are likely to be affected by a decision to introduce major change, consultation can be informal and is not required to be in writing. 8.2 Consultation After a Definite Decision has Been Made (a) Where an Employer has made a definite decision to introduce major changes in production, program, organisation, structure or technology that are likely to have significant effects on Employees, the Employer must notify the Employees who may be affected by the proposed changes and their representatives, which may include the Union/s. (b) Significant effects include termination of employment; major changes in the composition, operation or size of the Employer’s workforce or in the skills required; the elimination or diminution of job opportunities, promotion opportunities or job tenure; the alteration of hours of work; the need for retraining or transfer of Employees to other work or locations; and the restructuring of jobs. Provided that where the Agreement makes provision for alteration of any of these matters an alteration is deemed not to have significant effect.