CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION Clause Samples

The Certificated Personnel Evaluation clause establishes the procedures and standards for assessing the performance of employees who hold teaching or administrative certificates. Typically, this clause outlines the frequency of evaluations, the criteria used, and the roles of evaluators, such as school administrators or supervisors. Its core function is to ensure that certificated staff are meeting professional expectations and to provide a structured process for feedback and improvement, thereby supporting accountability and professional development within the organization.
CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION. (See Certificated Evaluation Program Handbook) 8.1 The County Superintendent of Schools and the Association understand that the purpose of personnel evaluations is to enhance staff development so as to maintain and improve the quality of education provided by the Department. The County Superintendent accepts the responsibility to create a favorable climate for each certificated staff member in order that program goals and objectives stated for each of the programs and functions conducted by the Santa ▇▇▇▇ County Office of Education might be more fully realized. Defining the extent to which such goals and objectives are being met is the reason for the continuing, constructive and cooperative experience of program and staff evaluation. 8.2 The County Superintendent and the Association agree that a successful evaluation program requires mutual respect and confidence between the evaluator and the person evaluated. The outcome of the evaluation process is the continuing assessment of the stated program goals and objectives and the development of ways to assist certificated staff members to apply their professional competencies to achieve desired program effectiveness. 8.3 The Superintendent recognizes their responsibility to provide the financial and personnel resources to conduct evaluation activities.
View SourceView Similar (2)
CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION 
View Source

Related to CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION

  • Contents of Personnel File A. Adverse statements prepared by the County shall not be included in an employee's official personnel file unless a copy is provided to the employee. B. An employee shall have the right to inspect and review the contents of his or her official personnel file at reasonable intervals. C. In addition, an employee shall have the right to inspect and review the contents of his or her official personnel file in any case where the employee has a grievance related to performance; to a performance evaluation; or is contesting his or her suspension or discharge from County service. D. Letters of reference and reports concerning criminal investigations concerning the employee shall be excluded from the provisions of B. and C., above. E. An employee shall have the right to respond in writing or personal interview to any information contained in his or her official personnel file, such reply to become a permanent part of such employee's official personnel file. F. Any contents of an employee's official personnel file may be destroyed pursuant to an agreement between the Chief of Employee Relations and the employee concerned or by an order of an arbitrator, court or impartial hearing officer unless the particular item is otherwise required by law to be kept.

  • Personnel File An employee, or the President of the Union, or his/her designate, with the written authority of the employee, shall be entitled to review the employee's personnel file(s), both paper and, if applicable, electronic, in the office in which the file is normally kept, in order to facilitate the investigation of a grievance. The employee or the President, as the case may be, shall give the Employer adequate notice prior to having access to such file(s).

  • Contractor Personnel – Reference Checks The Contractor warrants that all persons employed to provide service under this Contract have satisfactory past work records indicating their ability to adequately perform the work under this Contract. Contractor’s employees assigned to this project must meet character standards as demonstrated by background investigation and reference checks, coordinated by the agency/department issuing this Contract.

  • Access to Personnel Records Upon written request to the Chief of Police, an employee shall have access to the employee's records during normal office hours of the records custodian. Such access to personnel records shall be within a reasonable time of said request. Such request shall not interfere with the employee's regularly scheduled working hours. Review of the records shall be made in the presence of the Chief or the Chief’s designated representative.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION A. Formal evaluation of employees shall be in writing and shall be for the purpose of establishing a record of the employee’s work performance. The evaluation may include but is not limited to: establishing performance standards and outcome measures, recognition of an employee’s efforts, as well as planning for improvement. Issues of attendance and punctuality may be addressed if they have previously been discussed with the employee. The employee’s job description shall be a basis for the evaluation. B. The evaluator shall review the written evaluation with the employee and provide the employee with a copy. The employee shall sign the evaluation acknowledging receipt. If the employee has objections to the evaluation, s/he, may within twenty (20) working days following receipt of the evaluation put such objections in writing and have them attached to the evaluation report and placed in his/her personnel file. C. The frequency of evaluations shall be determined by the District and generally occur every other year by April 1st for bargaining unit employees. If the District chooses to do so, it may conduct formal evaluations on an annual basis. An employee may request to receive one (1) annual evaluation. Such request shall be in writing to the employee’s supervisor with a copy to the Human Resources Department. D. The Human Resources Department will consult with the Federation in developing an outline of best practices to be used in conducting employee evaluations. E. When the District determines that an employee’s work performance is unsatisfactory, it shall inform the employee in writing of any deficiency and the improvement expected and provide the employee with the opportunity to correct the unsatisfactory performance within a reasonable time period established by the District. F. The judgment of an employee’s work performance by an evaluating supervisor shall not be the subject of a grievance. A grievance concerning an evaluation shall be limited to an allegation that the evaluation was done in bad faith or clearly untrue. The burden of proof shall rest with the grievant. Such grievance shall be filed at the next administrative level above that of the evaluator and that administrator shall provide a written decision within ten (10) working days of any hearing. If the grievance is not resolved, it may be appealed by submitting a written statement to the Human Resources Department within ten (10) working days following receipt of the administrative written decision. The written statement must clearly set forth why the previous decision is in error regarding the allegation of bad faith or being clearly untrue. The Director of Labor Relations, or designee, may review the record of the grievance and/or conduct a hearing and shall issue a written decision within ten (10) working days following such review or hearing. Such decision shall be final. G. Effective July 1, 2013, Sign Language Interpreters will be evaluated using the Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment (EIPA) pursuant to OAR 581-015-2035 and/or the District’s evaluation form.