Compliance Project Clause Samples

The Compliance Project clause outlines the obligations and procedures for ensuring that a project or activity adheres to relevant laws, regulations, or contractual standards. Typically, this clause specifies the scope of compliance required, assigns responsibility for monitoring and reporting compliance, and may detail steps for addressing any identified non-compliance, such as corrective actions or audits. Its core practical function is to ensure that all parties involved in the project maintain legal and regulatory conformity, thereby reducing the risk of violations and associated penalties.
Compliance Project. Quarterly Progress Reports Due Date
View Source
Compliance Project. The fifty-four thousand dollars ($54,000) penalty is suspended pending the Discharger’s compliance with the time schedule and requirements to complete its Compliance Project, as detailed in Attachment B of this Order. If the Discharger completes the Compliance Project by the specified date, the suspended penalty is dismissed. I. Extensions: The Executive Officer may extend the abovementioned deadlines if the Discharger demonstrates that unforeseeable contingencies have created delays, provided that the Discharger continues to undertake all appropriate measures to meet the deadlines. The Discharger shall make any deadline extension request in writing. Under no circumstances may the completion of the Compliance Project extend past five (5) years from the issuance of this Order.
View Source
Compliance Project. In accordance with the Enforcement Policy and Water Code section 13385, the Parties agree that the CP Amount will be suspended pending completion of the CP as detailed below. The City understands that the completed CP is a material condition of this settlement of liability between the City and the Central Coast Water Board Prosecution Team. The amount associated with the CP shall be treated as a suspended administrative civil liability at the time of CP completion for purposes of this Order. The Central Coast Water Board is entitled to recover any portion of the CP Amount not expended in accordance with this Order. Additionally, a detailed CP description, including milestones, budgets, and performance measures, is attached hereto as Attachment B, and incorporated herein by reference.
View Source
Compliance Project. As a material consideration for the Central Valley Water Board’s acceptance of this Order, the Discharger will implement a Compliance Project to offset $108,000in liability associated with Water Code sections 13385 subdivision (h) and (i). The Prosecution Team has determined that the Compliance Project meets the requirements of the Enforcement Policy, SEP Policy, and Water Code section 13385, subdivision (k)(1): a. The City agrees to implement the following Compliance Project: Design and Planning Phase for Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvement Project (Compliance Project). This Compliance Project includes a Preliminary Engineering Report and Feasibility Study to determine the most effective method of complying with effluent limitations, and the City expended a total of $263,551. The Compliance Project was initiated by the City in order to address non-compliance identified by the Central Valley Water Board in previous Administrative Civil Liability Complaints R5-2013-0549 and 2012- 0538, which identified exceedances of effluent limitations including copper and zinc, in addition to 3 Notices of Violation which were received before the Compliance Project began in 2013. b. The Compliance Project is designed to correct the violations identified in Attachment B within five years because the City will complete needed repairs and upgrades to the WWTP within five years of the adoption of this Order. The Design and Feasibility Phase of this project has already been completed and the City is preparing to move onto the Construction Phase of the WWTP Improvement Project. c. The Compliance Project is in accordance with the Enforcement Policy: i. The Central Valley Water Board will not authorize additional compliance projects for the project completed as described in the attached, except under unusual circumstances. ii. The Discharger agrees that the Central Valley Water Board has the right to require a third-party audit of the funds expended by it to implement the Compliance Project; and, iii. The Discharger shall permit inspection of the Compliance Project by the Central Valley Water Board staff during normal business hours, at any location where the Compliance Project is being implemented, as well as review of any documents associated with implementation of the Compliance Project, at any time without notice.
View Source
Compliance Project. The Discharger understands that the completed Compliance Project is a material condition of this settlement of liability between the Discharger and the Central Valley Water Board Prosecution Team. The project qualified as a Compliance Project within the meaning of Water Code section 13385 (k) because it determined that assimilative capacity is available and a mixing zone exists in the receiving water for aluminum and DCBM, thereby offering a pathway for the Discharger to be in compliance with future effluent limits for these constituents.
View Source
Compliance Project. The Discharger understands that the completed Compliance Project is a material condition of this settlement of liability between the Discharger and the Central Valley Water Board Prosecution Team. The proposed project qualifies as a Compliance Project within the meaning of Water Code section 13385 (k) because it is an upgrade or repair to existing facilities being undertaken to reduce the volume of influent caused by inflow and infiltration in the sewer collection system. Since the Facility is operated by gravity only, a reduction in influent flow will result in longer chlorine contact time and more effective reduction of total coliform organisms in the effluent. Less inflow and infiltration will also reduce the influent waste stream dilution, thereby resulting in better biological treatment that improves BOD and TSS effluent concentrations and removal efficiency. In addition, less influent flow will ultimately reduce the amount of effluent discharged to the Middle Fork of the Feather River.
View Source
Compliance Project. As a material consideration for the Central Valley Water Board’s acceptance of this Order, the Discharger represents and agrees that, in accordance with Water Code section 13385, subdivision (k)(1): a. The Compliance Project is designed to correct the violations identified in Attachment B within five years. b. The Compliance Project is in accordance with the Enforcement Policy: i. The Central Valley Water Board will not authorize additional compliance projects for the project completed as described below, except under unusual circumstances. ii. The Discharger agrees that the Central Valley Water Board has the right to require a third-party audit of the funds expended by it to implement the Compliance Project; and, iii. The Discharger shall permit inspection of the Compliance Project by the Central Valley Water Board staff during normal business hours, at any location where the Compliance Project is being implemented, as well as review of any documents associated with implementation of the Compliance Project, at any time without notice. c. The County agrees to implement the following Compliance Project: Cottonwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project – Additive Alternative A, Installation of Redundant Traveling Bridge Sand Filter i. The goal of this project is to have a redundant filter at CSA 17 for ease of operations and maintenance. A new filter is being constructed as part of the base bid part of the project; however, the existing filter is obsolete, and replacement parts cannot be obtained. One filter is operated at all times and therefore cannot be taken offline for maintenance, as such Shasta County desires to include Additive Alternative A to the project to retrofit the existing filter. A redundant filter will allow for a filter to be taken offline annually for deep cleaning and other preventative maintenance thus maximizing filter useful life.
View Source
Compliance Project. The CP described herein allows the Settling Respondent to make capital improvements on its WWTP to bring the Settling Respondent into consistent compliance with Board orders, which is the main objective of the CP. The Parties agree that $222,000 of the Mandatory Minimum Penalty shall be suspended pending completion of the CP described in this paragraph and Exhibit D. The suspended portion shall be referred to as the Mandatory Minimum Penalty Amount.
View Source
Compliance Project. The District agrees to spend funds towards the completion of a Compliance Project to eliminate future violations for dichlorobromomethane, chlorine, and total copper. In a letter to the Central Valley Water Board dated 19 May 2015, the District indicates it will come into compliance with current effluent limitations by upgrading to tertiary treatment with the addition of a new anoxic/flow equalization basin, tertiary filtration, and ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection. Detailed plans concerning how the project will be implemented, as well as an implementation schedule, milestone dates, and budget are provided in the Compliance Project Description included herein as Exhibit C. The proposed upgrades have a total estimated cost of $9,600,000. To date, the District reported a total of $156,534 has been expended on the Facility Upgrade Plan and CEQA compliance for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Compliance Project is consistent with the project proposed to satisfy the requirements of Time Schedule Order No. R5-2015-0041, including the full compliance deadline of 18 May 2020. The total amount that the District will expend on the Compliance Project exceeds the mandatory minimum penalty that the Board is required to assess under Water Code sections 13385 subdivisions (h) and (i) for the violations identified in Exhibit A, Record of Violations.
View Source

Related to Compliance Project

  • Compliance Requirements A. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor agrees to comply, and to require its subcontractor(s) to comply, with the nondiscrimination provisions of MCL 37.2209. The Contractor further agrees to comply with the provisions of Section 9:158 of Chapter 112 of the ▇▇▇ Arbor City Code and to assure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment in a manner which provides equal employment opportunity.

  • CONTRACT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT The HUB requirement on this Contract is 0%. The student engagement requirement of this Contract is 0 hours. The Career Education requirement for this Contract is 0 hours. Failure to achieve these requirements may result in the application of some or all of the sanctions set forth in Administrative Policy 3.10, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • Compliance Monitoring Grantee must be subject to compliance monitoring during the period of performance in which funds are Expended and up to three years following the closeout of all funds. In order to assure that the program can be adequately monitored, the following is required of Grantee: a. Grantee must maintain a financial tracking system provided by Florida Housing that ensures that CRF funds are Expended in accordance with the requirements in this Agreement. b. Grantee must maintain records on all awards to Eligible Persons or Households. These records must include, but are not limited to: i. Proof of income compliance (documentation from submission month, including but not limited to paystub, Florida unemployment statement, social security and/or disability statement, etc.); ii. Lease; and iii. Documentation of rental assistance payments made.

  • Compliance Program The Company has established and administers a compliance program applicable to the Company, to assist the Company and the directors, officers and employees of the Company in complying with applicable regulatory guidelines (including, without limitation, those administered by the FDA, the EMA, and any other foreign, federal, state or local governmental or regulatory authority performing functions similar to those performed by the FDA or EMA); except where such noncompliance would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.