Concept Phase Sample Clauses

Concept Phase a. Prepare an analysis of the site and, in the case of the rehabilitation of an existing building, the existing condition of the building, including, but not limited to, determining the location, measurement and other essential data of existing architectural, equipment, structural, mechanical, electrical and utility features, and submit a report to the Fund setting forth such analysis and confirming that the data available is sufficient to proceed with the design of the project. Provide additional information reasonably determined by the Fund to be necessary or desirable, such as topography, soil data, and municipal agency and utility company projects and/or a plan for accessing such information. b. Identify such testing, measurements, verification, and/or surveys as may be required to properly execute the design of the project. c. Prepare diagrammatic studies of the Project showing, in the case of a project involving a structure, the relationship of rooms and spaces to the program requirements of the Fund and to the site, services, utilities and other structures; and in the case of a project involving sitework, the relationship of site systems to the site, services, utilities, and structures. d. Confirm the Program Budget and Schedule and identify and justify any proposed changes. e. Prepare a construction phasing analysis, which shows the time frames provided by the campus and maintains adjacent occupancies, including a description of temporary construction and facilities necessary to maintain campus operations; establish a general sequence of the phasing demonstrating the continuity of campus operations. f. Prepare a Code Analysis providing for compliance with all applicable requirements. g. Prepare a concept phase cost estimate verifying that the Project can be completed within the Program Budget. h. Prepare a Concept Phase Report in a format acceptable to the Fund, setting forth in detail the function, scope and intent of the Project and illustrating three or more design concepts which satisfy the basic program requirements of each proposed design.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Concept Phase. Per the Memorandum of Understanding, all ODOT and PWB waterline initial design and review costs during the Concept Phase, prior to June 14, 2021, and consultant work included in contract amendment #1, will be shared equally between Agency and ODOT. The total cost of the Concept Phase is $411,000. Agency shall pay ODOT $126,500 to complete Agency’s 50% share. Breakdown is as follows: i. PWB costs were $79,000. ii. ODOT costs were $42,000 for ODOT review and $290,000 in consultant fees for a total of $332,000 iii. Concept Phase Total = $411,000 iv. 50% = $205,500, v. PWB responsibility is $205,500 - $79,000, or $126,500. At the time this IGA is executed, PWB shall pay ODOT $126,500 for PWB’s share of Concept Phase work.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Concept Phase. The Concept Phase (see Figure 20) comprises the Item Definition, the Hazard and Risk Analysis and the Functional Safety concept. All the activities emphasized in red are security related activities and thereby form an extension to the life cycle defined by the ISO 26262.  purpose and description,  function(s) and relations between functions,  requirements for each function,  draft architecture/outline,  additional nonfunctional constraints,  borders or interfaces to other items/systems,  legal requirements, whereby an item is a system that implements a function at the vehicle level. An important aspect is the identification of some malfunctioning behaviour of the considered system, which is later considered during Hazard and Risk Analysis. Potential malfunctions can be identified during Item Definition using HAZOP analysis [54]1. Analogously the Item Definition activity is also extended by a security related activity that identifies possible security violations. As a result of the Item Definition a functional description of the item, a set of malfunctions and a set of security violations are defined. Similar activities can be defined for the security related aspects. During a threat analysis the threats have to be described and considered within certain operational situations. These threats can then be estimated in respect to their criticality and a corresponding criticality level might be derived. In the end security goals should be defined in order to reduce the risk of an attack. The safety and security goals are now the input to derive functional safety and security requirements. In this phase first interference analyses have to be undertaken in order to identify their impact on each other.
View Source
Concept Phase. The services called for in the Report Phase of this Agreement shall be completed concurrently with the preliminary design phase and five (5) copies of the Preliminary Study and Report shall be submitted within 30 consecutive calendar days following the written authorization from the Owner for the Consultant to proceed. The time frame set forth in the written authorization from the Owner for the Consultant to proceed.
View Source
Concept Phase. Data Collection – Obtain as-builts, topographic survey, other drawings and reports from the County and adjacent developer pertinent to the site.
View Source
Concept Phase. Students propose solutions - students meet as a full group to discuss various marketing solutions - students to determine which group will be responsible for which elements - students to propose timeline for competition of elements - proposed budget matching marketing elements/timeline - proposal to be approved/adjusted by faculty
View Source
Concept Phase. Price: The concept phase is quoted for *** ******.
View Source
Concept Phase. During this phase, the Parties will validate the standard P2P processes to be implemented and any unique Solectron requirement which might have to be taken into account.
View Source
Concept Phase. To develop a sufficient level of understanding for the equipment under control (EUC) and its environment to enable the other safety lifecycle activities to be carried out satisfactorily. • Overall Scope Definition. To determine the boundary between the EUC and EUC control system (ECS), and to specify the scope of the hazard and risk analysis.
View Source

Related to Concept Phase

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in ▇▇▇▇▇, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Production Phase contract period in which the Development and the Production are to be performed.

  • Design Phase All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement with the exception of Interdisciplinary Document Coordination Review, conducting a Card Trick session, Value-Engineering services, Estimating services. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement.

  • Schematic Design Phase 1.2.1 Based on the mutually agreed upon Program of Requirements, Amount Available for the Construction Contract and the Project Schedule, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare sufficient alternative approaches utilizing BIM for design and construction of the Project to satisfy Owner’s project requirements and shall, at completion of this phase, submit Schematic Design Documents derived from the model in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review alternative approaches to design and construction for the Project as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by the Owner within the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Schematic Design. The Architect/Engineer shall provide the Construction Manager with a compact disc containing documents and data files derived from the model to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.2.2 Architect/Engineer shall provide all services necessary to perform the services of this phase (preparation of model(s), relevant data, decision support model views and Schematic Design Documents) including, without limitation, unless otherwise approved by Owner, the preparation and prompt delivery of all items specified in the BIM Execution Plan and “Facility Design Guidelines”. 1.2.3 Architect/Engineer shall work closely with Owner in preparation of schematic drawings and shall specifically conform to Owner’s requirements regarding aesthetic design issues. 1.2.4 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.2.5 Before proceeding into the Design Development Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Schematic Design documents and approval of the Architect/Engineer’s preliminary Estimated Construction Cost and schedule. 1.2.6 The Architect/Engineer shall participate in a final review of the Schematic Design Documents and model(s) with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. Prior to the Owner’s approval of the Schematic Design Documents, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate such changes as are necessary to satisfy the Owner’s review comments, any of which may be appealed for good cause.