Construction Method Clause Samples

Construction Method. At each site of operation, set up, maintain, and remove the appropriate traffic control devices, per the North Carolina Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, January 2012, the North Carolina Department of Transportation Roadway Standards Drawings, and the current edition of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Conduct operations in a safe manner, adhering to all utility separation requirements. Bucket Truck Hour

Construction Method. Demonstrate the ability to achieve desired surface inside each depression without tearing or snagging the asphalt prior to beginning the work. Provide rumble strips that shall have finished dimensions of seven inches (± ½ inch) long in the direction of travel and are 8 inch or 12 inches (± ½ inch) wide measured perpendicular to the direction of travel. Provide rumble having depressions with concave circular shape with a minimum ½-inch depth at center (maximum allowable depth of 5/8-inch). Place rumble strips in relation to the roadway according to the patterns shown in Standard Drawing 665.01. Material resulting from the operation shall become the property of the Contractor. Remove and dispose of this material in accordance with Section 802 of the Standard Specifications. If milled rumble strips are installed with the intent of placing thermoplastic pavement markings over the milled-in rumble strips, the Contractor shall remove all debris after milling to ensure optimum adhesion between the surface and the thermoplastic. At the end of each working day, remove all equipment to a location where it does not present a hazard to traffic, clean the pavement by sweeping or flushing, and reopen the work area to traffic.

Construction Method. 2.4.1.1 Construction of the promenade with public landing facility and the breakwater will mainly involve dredging of seabed, underwater rock excavation, construction of sloping seawall, pile construction and construction of deck structures. The improvement works for the existing lookout points and the existing viewing platform will involve demolition of existing structures, installation of new concrete structures and backfilling. To minimise the potential environmental impacts, the following construction methods and sequences have been considered and adopted for the Project as far as possible:  Minimise active marine works area by phased construction and adopting piled deck structure for the public landing facility and breakwater to reduce the amount of dredging works;  Utilise pre-cast elements for construction of the public landing facility and breakwater as far as practicable to minimise in-situ construction works so as to reduce the construction period and environmental impacts, such as waste generation, noise and dust impacts;  Incorporate ecological features such as seawall enhanced with rough texture and irregular pattern into the design of vertical seawall as far as practicable to provide shades and refuge for organisms. A submission on the detailed design of the ecological features to be adopted will be prepared subject to comment by the AFCD prior to the installation of the ecological features;  Install silt curtain and restrict dredging operation to a production rate of no more than 100m3 per hour to minimise the potential water quality impact (e.g. prevent the dispersion of suspended sediments) arising from the dredging works; and  Implement good site practice and appropriate environmental mitigation/control measures.

Construction Method a. The pipeline will be installed by directional bore if applicable. Any disturbed areas will be restored by Columbia Gas whether grass or hard surface.

Construction Method. The Contractor shall supply, place and compact the 6 mm down limestone material in accordance with CW 3110, Base Course. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT

Construction Method. The contractor shall provide a 3-man crew of qualified and equipped saw operators to perform assigned work. Each saw operator is to be equipped with tools and personal protective equipment in good working condition. Crewman qualification consists of each saw operator having received proper training and experience in safely and efficiently performing tree felling and various other chain saw operations, per OSHA General Industry Standards 29 CFR 1910.132 thru 1910.138. Prior to beginning work under this contract, the contractor must provide the Department with a listing of saw operators who will be utilized on this project along with a statement detailing their prior experience performing tree work and the related safety training that these operators have received.

Construction Method. Formworks 1703(D) CONCRETE WORKS (CLASS 20/20) OF CULVERT WALLS AND SLABS

Construction Method. The contractor will be notified of the emergency tree services work by the Engineer and shall begin work within 2 hours after notification or as determined by the Engineer. Failure to mobilize to the designated location(s) and begin work within the designated time frame for the emergency tree cutting service or as approved by the Engineer shall result in liquidated damages, as defined elsewhere in this document, or may result in cancellation of this contract. Emergency Mobilization Each

Construction Method. Two-thousand unique sentences were randomly taken from the Propbank corpus. All Propbank annotation was removed, leaving only the pure sentence text. Next, these sentences were submitted to Amazon Mechanical Turk in the form of a Turk task. Turks were asked to provide a token by token labeling of the Cause and Effect Phrase in each sentence and to classify each sentence as causal or non-causal. A redundancy of 5 was used, meaning that for each sentence, 5 different Turk annotations were collected. To generate the annotated corpus, a series of steps was followed: First, a simple majority vote of Turks was used to determine if each sentence was causal or not. While labeling each token by a majority vote would have been possible, there were several difficulties encountered. First, there were three different token classes (cause, effect, and non-causal) so a majority vote was not guaranteed. Second, it was observed that some Turk data was less than ideal – it seemed that some Turks had selected random tokens and other had marked a sentence as causal but had not selected any cause or effect phrase. To compensate for these issues, a user confidence score for each Turks was first computed. This confidence score was based on the percentage of sentences in which the individual Turk had agreed with the majority of Turks as to whether the sentence in question was causal, weighted by also by the total number of sentence he or she had labeled. Using these confidence scores, it was then possible to perform a weighted voting process in which the votes of Turks with higher confidence scores carried greater weight than those with lower confidence. After the Turk annotation was complete, another pass was made by a manual annotator to verify the accuracy of the Turk annotations. The manual annotator corrected the boundaries of the cause and effect phrases, and in some cases, either added or deleted causal relations. Additionally, the annotator manually tagged every causal relation with a Causal Cue Phrase. One notable difference in our corpus with respect to previous work is the much higher percentage of causal relations. We find 719 causal relations in 2000 sentences for a 35.95% chance of a sentence containing a causal relation. Past work using a corpus of 2000 sentences only identified 115 as causal (▇▇▇▇▇, 2003) for only a 5.75% chance of a sentence containing a causal relation. This difference is mostly likely a result of our attempt to identify all intra- sentential ca...