Continued verification arrangements Clause Samples

Continued verification arrangements. 3.1. The authority which has granted UN type approval may at any time verify the conformity control methods applied in each production facility. 3.1.1. The normal arrangements shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements) of this Schedule. 3.1.1.1. Surveillance activities carried out by the technical services (qualified or recognized as required in paragraphs 1.3.1 and 1.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Continued verification arrangements. 3.1. The authority which has granted UN type-approval may at any time verify the conformity control methods applied in each production facility. 3.1.1. The normal arrangements shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements) of this Schedule. 3.1.1.1. Surveillance activities carried out by the Technical Services (qualified or recognised as required in paragraph 1.3.3) shall be accepted as satisfying the requirements of paragraph 3. 1.1 concerning the procedures established at the initial assessment. 3.1.1.2. The normal frequency of these verifications by the approval authority (other than those referred to in paragraph 3.1. 1.1) shall be such as to ensure that the relevant controls applied in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Schedule are reviewed at intervals based on a risk assessment methodology consistent with the international standard ISO 31000:2009 — Risk Management — Principles and guidelines and, in all cases, with a minimum frequency of once every three years. This methodology should take particular account of any non-conformity raised by Contracting Parties under Article 4 of the 1958 Agreement. 3.2. At every review, the records of tests and checks and production records shall be available to the inspector; in particular, records of those tests or checks documented as required in paragraph 2.2. 3.3. The inspector may select samples at random to be tested in the manufacturer's laboratory or in the facilities of the Technical Service. In such a case only physical tests shall be carried out. The minimum number of samples may be determined according to the results of the manufacturer's own verification. 3.4. Where the level of control appears unsatisfactory, or when it seems necessary to verify the validity of the tests carried out in application of paragraph 3.2, the inspector shall select samples to be sent to the Technical Service to perform physical tests. 3.5. Where unsatisfactory results are found during an inspection or a monitoring review, the approval authority shall ensure that all necessary steps are taken to restore conformity of production as rapidly as possible.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Continued verification arrangements. 8.6.1. The authority which has granted the type-approval may at any time verify the conformity of production control methods applied in each production facility by means of periodic audits. The manufacturer shall for that purpose allow access to the manufacture, inspection, testing, storage and distribution sites and shall provide all necessary information with regard to the quality management system documentation and records. 8.6.1.1. The normal approach for such periodic audits shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in paragraphs 8.4. and 8.5. (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements). 8.6.1.1.1. Surveillance activities carried out by the technical services shall be accepted as satisfying the requirements of paragraph 8. 6.1.1. with regard to the procedures established at initial assessment. 8.6.1.1.2. The minimum frequency of verifications (other than those referred to in paragraph 8.6.1.1. 1.) to ensure that the relevant conformity of production controls applied in accordance with paragraphs 8.4. and 8.5. are reviewed over a period consistent with the climate of trust established by the Type Approval Authority shall be at least once every two years. However, additional verifications shall be carried out by the Type Approval Authority depending on the yearly production, the results of previous evaluations, the need to monitor corrective actions and upon a reasoned request from another Type Approval Authority or any market surveillance authority. 8.6.2. At every review, the records of tests, checks and production records, and in particular the records of those tests or checks documented as required in paragraph 8.5.2., shall be available to the inspector. 8.6.3. The inspector may select random samples to be tested in the manufacturer’s laboratory or in the facilities of the technical service, in which case only physical tests shall be carried out. The minimum number of samples may be determined according to the results of the manufacturer’s own verification. 8.6.4. Where the level of control appears unsatisfactory, or when it seems necessary to verify the validity of the tests carried out in application of paragraph 8.6.2., or upon a reasoned request from another Type Approval Authority, the inspector shall select samples to be tested in the manufacturer’s laboratory or sent to the technical service to perform physical tests in accordance with the requirements set out in paragraph 8.7. and in this Regul...
View Source
Continued verification arrangements. 8.6.1. The authority which has granted the type-approval may at any time verify the conformity of production control methods applied in each production facility by means of periodic audits. The manufacturer shall for that purpose allow access to the manufacture, inspection, testing, storage and distribution sites and shall provide all necessary information with regard to the quality management system documentation and records. 8.6.1.1. The normal approach for such periodic audits shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in paragraphs 8.4. and 8.5. (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements). 8.6.1.1.1. Surveillance activities carried out by the technical services shall be accepted as satisfying the requirements of paragraph 8. 6.1.1. with regard to the procedures established at initial assessment. 8.6.1.1.2. The minimum frequency of verifications (other than those referred to in paragraph 8.6.1.1. 1.) to ensure that the relevant conformity of production controls applied in accordance with paragraphs 8.4. and 8.5. are reviewed over a period consistent with the climate of trust established by the approval authority shall be at least once every two years. However, additional verifications shall be carried out by the approval authority depending on the yearly production, the results of previous evaluations, the need to monitor corrective actions and upon a reasoned request from another approval authority or any market surveillance authority.
View Source

Related to Continued verification arrangements

  • Eligibility Verification (a) HHSC will verify Medicaid eligibility for Dual Eligible Members by the fifth business day of the month following the receipt of the MA Dual SNP’s monthly enrollment file, in accordance with Section 3.02(b). (b) To verify Medicaid eligibility of an individual Member, HHSC agrees to provide the MA Dual SNP with real-time access to HHSC’s claims administrator’s Medicaid eligibility verification system.

  • Employee Verification In accordance with Neb. Rev.

  • Employment Verification Grantee will confirm the eligibility of all persons employed during the contract term to perform duties within Texas and all persons, including subcontractors, assigned by the contractor to perform work pursuant to the Contract.

  • Sick Leave Verification Process a. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee receives confirmation of employment in the school district. b. An employee must initiate the sick leave verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of commencing employment with the new school district. c. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the sick leave credits which the employee seeks to port.

  • Employee Eligibility Verification The Contractor warrants that it fully complies with all Federal and State statutes and regulations regarding the employment of aliens and others and that all its employees performing work under this Contract meet the citizenship or alien status requirement set forth in Federal statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall obtain, from all employees performing work hereunder, all verification and other documentation of employment eligibility status required by Federal or State statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 U.S.C. §1324 et seq., as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter amended. The Contractor shall retain all such documentation for all covered employees for the period prescribed by the law. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved in writing by County, and hold harmless, the County, its agents, officers, and employees from employer sanctions and any other liability which may be assessed against the Contractor or the County or both in connection with any alleged violation of any Federal or State statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of any persons performing work under this Contract.