Conversational Search and Question Answering Sample Clauses

Conversational Search and Question Answering. The topic of chatbots and conversational answer seeking has recently become quite popular. ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ [153] defined a set of required properties and designed a theoretical model of interactions in a conversational search. ▇.▇▇▇▇▇ et al. [103] released a dataset for conversational question an- swering, which was built by a converting complex multi-part questions from WikiTables dataset to a sequence of related questions using crowdsourcing. Authors identified major challenges in this data as resolving references to previously mentioned entities and semantic matching. Much work has been done in the area of comparing user interactions with a human and a computer. There are varying opinions on the subject. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. [64] found no significant differences in how Twitter users treated a social bot, whether it was perceived as a human or not. In turn, Cl´ement and Guitton [54] report that the way bots are perceived varies with the role they play. They found that “invasive” Wikipedia bots received more “polarizing” feedback – both positive and negative – compared to the bots that carried out “silent helper” functions. The similar result is reported by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. [141] – Stackoverflow bot receives more negative feedback for false answers when its identity as an automatic program is revealed. Another work by Aharoni and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ [6] reports mixed results from participants who underwent a mock interview with a human and an automatic system. The authors report that there were no explicit differences in the interviewer perception described by the participants, although the authors noticed significant differences in people’s behavior – when talking to a human interviewer they made greater effort to speak, smiled more, and were more affected by a rejection. In a study by Luger and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ [132], 14 people were interviewed about their experience with an intelligent assistant that they use in their daily life. The authors report on people’s experiences, expectations, discuss scenarios of successes and failures of conversational agents. They report that the most frequent types of tasks are relatively simple – weather updates and checking reminders. Early QA studies considered users the sole proactive part asking refining questions and clarifying on system’s response [59]. QA with a more active system’s role was investigated within the complex interactive QA (ciQA) TREC track: assessors provided additional information in various forms to live QA systems...
View Source

Related to Conversational Search and Question Answering

  • Drug-Free Workplace Certification As required by Executive Order No. 90-5 dated April 12, 1990, issued by the Governor of Indiana, the Company hereby covenants and agrees to make a good faith effort to provide and maintain a drug-free workplace at the Project Location. The Company will give written notice to the IEDC within ten (10) days after receiving actual notice that the Company, or an employee of the Company in the State of Indiana, has been convicted of a criminal drug violation occurring in the workplace. False certification or violation of this certification may result in sanctions including, but not limited to, suspension of payments under the Agreement, termination of the Agreement and/or debarment of contracting opportunities with the State for up to three (3) years. In addition to the provisions of the above paragraph, if the total amount set forth in the Agreement is in excess of $25,000.00, the Company agrees that it will provide a drug-free workplace by: A. Publishing and providing to all of its employees a statement notifying them that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Company’s workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition;

  • Email You acknowledge that we are able to send electronic mail to you and receive electronic mail from you. You release us from any claim you may have as a result of any unauthorised copying, recording, reading or interference with that document or information after transmission, for any delay or non-delivery of any document or information and for any damage caused to your system or any files by a transfer.

  • IN CASE OF ERRORS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS You must telephone us at (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ or toll free at ▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ or write us at Finance Factors, Limited, Attn: EFT Division, P. O. Box 3979, Honolulu, Hawaii 96812-9979, as soon as you can, if you think your statement is wrong or if you need more information about an Electronic Fund Transfer listed on the statement. We must hear from you no later than 60 days after we sent the FIRST statement on which the problem or error appeared. When reporting an error or requesting more information: 1. Tell us your name and account number. 2. Describe the error or the transfer you are unsure about, and explain as clearly as you can why you believe it is an error or why you need more information. 3. Tell us the dollar amount of the suspected error. If you tell us orally, we may require that you also send us your complaint or question in writing within 10 business days. We will tell you the results of our investigation within 10 business days after we hear from you and will correct any error promptly. If we need more time, however, we may take up to 45 days to investigate your complaint or question. If we decide to do this, we will re-credit your account within 10 business days for the amount you think is in error, so that you will have the use of the money during the time it takes us to complete our investigation. If we ask you to put your complaint or question in writing and we do not receive it within 10 business days, we may not re-credit your account. We will tell you the results within 3 business days after completing our investigation. If we decide that there was no error, we will send you a written explanation. You may ask for copies of the documents that we used in our investigation. If your request relates to a wire transfer or is a routine inquiry, such as a request for the balance in your account or for documents for tax purposes, we will not treat your request as relating to an error and our response may take longer than the periods described above and will not involve any re-crediting.

  • TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING In accordance with Executive Order (EO) 13513, “Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving,” any and all text messaging by Federal employees is banned: a) while driving a Government owned vehicle (GOV) or driving a privately owned vehicle (POV) while on official Government business; or b) using any electronic equipment supplied by the Government when driving any vehicle at any time. All cooperators, their employees, volunteers, and contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging when driving company owned, leased or rented vehicles, POVs or GOVs when driving while on official Government business or when performing any work for or on behalf of the Government.

  • Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Pursuant to Executive Order 13513, 74 FR 51225 (Oct. 6, 2009), Recipient should encourage its employees, subrecipients, and contractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, and Recipient should establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers.