Cost Efficiency Sample Clauses

Cost Efficiency. All parties agree to use the most cost­efficient resources as applicable. It is a goal of agencies on this plan to provide cost efficient services. Agency administrators will make every effort to ensure cost effectiveness during firefighting operations. However, cost efficiencies will not take priority over firefighter or public safety. Additionally, the potential long­term financial impacts of the fire should be considered and balanced against the short­term costs savings of not ordering needed resources.

Cost Efficiency. 3.1.1 Affiliated Provider agrees to provide quality health care in a timely and cost-efficient manner.

Cost Efficiency. Both Parties undertake to use reasonable commercial efforts to evaluate opportunities to improve cost efficiency in order to achieve cost savings. Either Party shall forthwith inform the other Party on any potential for cost savings and shall, if available, provide corresponding information. The Parties shall enter into good faith negotiations to agree on the implementation of measures to improve cost efficiency and on the sharing of the corresponding costs and benefits.

Cost Efficiency. The Parties shall ensure cost efficiency and shall co-operate to avoid unnecessary costs and identify and implement efficient solutions. Parties shall ensure that costs are in line with CACM, more specifically costs shall be reasonable, efficient and proportionate.

Cost Efficiency. 🗷 The cost-efficiency is adequate. 🞎 There are no lower cost alternatives to achieve the same impact. The expenses and income calculation procedure of the parents program "Incredible years" is illustrative and the rate of return found based on it is preliminary as the analysis requires a significant amount of additional information in the context of Estonia. However, based on the analysis, it can be said that the program will be profitable. According to the analysis, the Estonian pilot project of the parents program "Incredible years" has the internal rate of return (IRR) of 23%, with a 95% probability of being 19-27% and a net present value (NPV) of 12 199 €, with a 95% probability of being between 8 724 and 16 595€ per each child that completed the program. The results are also supported by the international IA program's cost-effectiveness and expense-income scientific research. 12

Cost Efficiency. Jurisdictions will identify conditions under which cost efficiency may dictate where suppression strategies and tactical actions are taken (i.e., it may be more cost effective to put the containment line along an open grassland than along a mid-slope in timber). Points to consider include loss and benefit to land, values at risk, resource, social and political values, and existing legal statutes. Federal Agencies will use the Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS) for this purpose. The non- federal agencies are encouraged to participate in the WFDSS for supporting decisions during multi- jurisdictional incidents. If not utilizing WFDSS, utilize the current state process for analysis and complexity for all state responsibility fires, including fires that receive a FEMA declaration.

Cost Efficiency. Regardless of whether there exists an associated Service Level, PwC Firm will be no less efficient in its use of the resources or services necessary to provide the Services than it is in its use of resources and services to provide similar services in similar circumstances for Itself.

Cost Efficiency.  The cost-efficiency is adequate.  There are no lower cost alternatives to achieve the same impact. In Estonia there hasn´t been a research about whether this program is more cost-efficient in compared to other programs. However, calculations have been made to estimate how high the costs would be when implementing the program. The total cost of implementing the program here in Tallinn has been estimated at 22 277,89 €. The costs include the following:  Salaries for professionals (including pre-interviews, network meeting and group sessions for parents- 13 695,76 €  Room rent- 3650,00 €  Catering- 1280,00 €  Office material (paper, colours, pencils, etc.)- 858,00 €  Communication costs (internet and phone bills)- 332,97 €  Transportation costs- 480,00 €  Translation of the training material- 495,00 €  Cleaning (after training)- 24 €  Webpage domain and renewal of the page - 212,16 € Promotion of the program (leaflets, workshops)- 1250,00 €

Cost Efficiency. 🞎 The cost-efficiency is adequate. 🞎 There are no lower cost alternatives to achieve the same impact. In Estonia there has not been a cost-efficiency alternatives research made for the P.E.T. program before implementing it.