Course Rigor Sample Clauses

The Course Rigor clause defines the expected level of academic challenge and standards that a course must maintain. It typically outlines the depth of content, the complexity of assignments, and the performance benchmarks students are required to meet, such as critical thinking, analytical skills, or mastery of subject matter. By setting these expectations, the clause ensures that the course maintains a consistent and appropriate level of difficulty, helping to uphold academic integrity and prepare students adequately for subsequent coursework or professional requirements.
Course Rigor. Dual credit courses may vary in where they are taught (at the college, at the high school or online), by whom they are taught (college faculty or high school faculty), and when they are taught. Regardless, SACSOC state in their Dual Enrollment Policy Statement which includes any college courses taught at the high school: “Course content and rigor of dual enrollment courses are comparable to that of the same courses taught to the institution’s other students.” In addition, it states “The faculty assumes primary responsibility for dual enrollment course. Such oversight ensures both the rigor of programs/courses and the quality of instruction.” Note SACSCOC refers to all dual credit courses as dual enrollment courses.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Course Rigor. The parties shall provide rigorous college readiness instruction according to the THECB rules regarding the list of aligned high school and college courses, dual credit, and technical credit. AISD shall ensure the high school credit courses meet all TEC requirements. The College shall ensure college credit courses meet all THECB requirements.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Course Rigor. I acknowledge that online courses are as rigorous, if not more challenging, than face-to-face courses.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Course Rigor. Dual credit courses can vary where they are taught (at the college, at the high school or online), by whom they are taught (college faculty or high school faculty), and when they are taught. Regardless, the Southern Associate of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, which all KCTCS institutions are accredited by, state in their Dual Enrollment Policy Statement: “Course content and rigor of dual enrollment courses are comparable to that of the same courses taught to the institution’s other students.” In addition, it states “The faculty assumes primary responsibility for dual enrollment course. Such oversight ensures both the rigor of programs/courses and the quality of instruction.”
View Source
Course Rigor. The parties shall provide rigorous college readiness instruction according to the THECB rules regarding the list of aligned high school and college courses, dual credit, and technical credit. Responsive Ed Texas shall ensure the high school credit courses meet all TEC requirements. The College shall ensure college credit courses meet all THECB requirements.
View Source
Course Rigor. Dual credit courses may vary in where they are taught (at the college, at the high school, or online), by whom they are taught (college faculty or high school faculty), and when they are taught. SACSCOC states in their Dual Enrollment Policy Statement, which includes any college courses taught at the high school: “Course content and rigor of dual enrollment courses are comparable to that of the same courses taught to the institution’s other students.” In addition, it states, “The faculty assumes primary responsibility for dual enrollment course. Such oversight ensures both the rigor of programs/courses and the quality of instruction.” (Note: In SACSCOC policy language, the term “dual enrollment” applies to both dual credit and dual enrollment courses as defined in Section II.) KCTCS will not modify curriculum specifically for dual credit courses. Per KRS 164.580, the KCTCS Faculty Senate has the primary responsibility for developing, reviewing, and modifying curricula.
View Source

Related to Course Rigor

  • Management Grievance The Employer may initiate a grievance at Step 3 of the grievance procedure by the Employer or designate presenting the grievance to the President of the Union or designate. Time limits and process are identical to a union grievance.

  • STANDARDS OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS In performing its obligations hereunder, during the term of this ESA, the Competitive Supplier shall exercise reasonable care to assure that its facilities are prudently and efficiently managed; that it employs an adequate number of competently trained and experienced personnel to carry out its responsibilities; that it delivers or arranges to deliver a safe and reliable supply of such amounts of electricity to the Point of Delivery as are required under this ESA; that it complies with all relevant industry standards and practices for the supply of electricity to Participating Consumers; and that, at all times with respect to Participating Consumers, it exercises good practice for a Competitive Supplier and employs Commercially Reasonable skills, systems and methods available to it.

  • MANAGEMENT GRIEVANCES 14.01 It is understood that the Management may bring forward at any meeting held with the Union Representative any complaint with respect to the conduct of the Union, or Stewards, and that if such complaint by Management is not settled to the mutual satisfaction of the conferring Parties, it may be treated as a grievance and referred to arbitration in the same way as the grievance of any employee.

  • Management and Operation of Business Section 7.1 Management 61 Section 7.2 Replacement of Fiduciary Duties 63 Section 7.3 Certificate of Limited Partnership 63 Section 7.4 Restrictions on the General Partner’s Authority 63 Section 7.5 Reimbursement of the General Partner 64 Section 7.6 Outside Activities 65 Section 7.7 Indemnification 65 Section 7.8 Limitation of Liability of Indemnitees 67 Section 7.9 Resolution of Conflicts of Interest; Standards of Conduct and Modification of Duties 68 Section 7.10 Other Matters Concerning the General Partner 70 Section 7.11 Purchase or Sale of Partnership Interests 70 Section 7.12 Registration Rights of the General Partner and its Affiliates 71 Section 7.13 Reliance by Third Parties 73

  • Safe Operations Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, an NTO may take, or cause to be taken, such action with respect to the operation of its facilities as it deems necessary to maintain Safe Operations. To ensure Safe Operations, the local operating rules of the ITO(s) shall govern the connection and disconnection of generation with NTO transmission facilities. Safe Operations include the application and enforcement of rules, procedures and protocols that are intended to ensure the safety of personnel operating or performing work or tests on transmission facilities.