Documentation Review Sample Clauses

Documentation Review. Contractor must supply any document required by or referenced in and consistent with this MOA in either paper or electronic form, and any such version shall be sufficient for all purposes under this MOA.

Documentation Review. The Nuventive consultant will submit a request for documentation to the customer, which will include samples of existing plans, planning processes, and roles and responsibilities. The consultant will review this documentation and address any questions with the customer’s project manager.

Documentation Review. 13A.1 The Developer shall submit for the review of the Grantor's Representative, no later than the delivery dates prescribed under Clause 13B.3, comprehensive draft or revised Quality Documentation in a form in accordance with the requirements of Clause 13B and Schedule 5. 13A.2 Within 30 days of the receipt of such draft or revised Quality Documentation, the Grantor's Representative shall either:

Documentation Review. Supplier must carefully review ▇▇▇▇▇ drawings and related specifications to ensure understanding and confirmation that the supplier can meet any such requirements. Supplier shall clarify all the doubts with ▇▇▇▇▇ sourcing team before submitting the quote or samples or production parts. All issues that are not covered on the existing drawings or specifications (e.g. ROHS requirements, compliance requirements etc.) shall be communicated through Purchase Order, revised drawing, Engineering Change or Deviation. It is expected from supplier that all terms and conditions of Purchase Order is fulfilled. Supplier shall ensure that correct and current version of drawings or specification document is available and all other documents are discarded. Any deviation in the process which may impact the product quality shall be communicated to ▇▇▇▇▇ and take prior approval before shipping. The impact of unauthorized deviation (cost, special inspection, third party inspection, field failures, complaints or any other) at ▇▇▇▇▇ or at ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ customer shall be debited to supplier. Supplier shall retain the Inspection reports, drawings, specifications, purchase orders with proper traceability for minimum 1 year after part obsolescence. Supplier shall ensure bear minimum documentation requirements during shipping the parts to ▇▇▇▇▇ as below which is mandatory. 1. Commercial Invoice with Correct Purchase order number mentioned 2. Inspection report/test reports/COC 3. Traceability sticker on the part with proper batch number, date of manufacturing 4. ROHS sticker / ROHS report/COC

Documentation Review. As a part of the product evaluation process, members of the Compaq/Gadzoox Microsystems team will review the current engineering specification package to assure: A. All documentation is present and legible. B. Specified tolerances are defined and sub-tier suppliers' manufacturing process capabilities known. C. Specified dimensions do not conflict with other documentation. D. Clarity of workmanship standards is defined. Any discrepancies or issues shall be noted on the SDP Print Acceptance Form, PAF,. The items will be assigned to the Compaq/Gadzoox Microsystems project teams for resolution. The project teams will be accountable for completing the items within a specified time frame. When changes to any content within the Kit have occurred then, each month, Compaq Procurement Engineering will be responsible for issuing Gadzoox Microsystems Quality Assurance Manager all new released and ECN documentation. This documentation distribution will include the assembly, reference specifications, Receiving Inspection Procedures, and Compaq manufacturing diagnostics. [*], Gadzoox Microsystems shall send Compaq Procurement Engineer all Compaq product drawings, ECNs, and PCNs that affect form, fit, function, P/N changes, and QA procedures. This information is required for Compaq documentation control. [*]CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS. 22

Documentation Review. Where the scope of the assignment includes reviewing risks and internal controls, Contractors will be expected to identify and collect and review documentation, which may be in electronic format, and interview provider personnel as appropriate. Knowledge: Contractors will have the necessary knowledge, skills and experience relevant to the delivery of field work in support of assurance or audit work as set out in the Engagement Letter such as within ESFA funded programmes as applicable. Further testing or changes in scope: As part of next steps during the assignment the Contractor may be required to carry out further testing or changes in scope. Professional Standards: All assignment work needs to be completed with due regard to professional standards and take into account the relevant ESFA funding (where required within the call off). Methodology (services) The scope for the work will be agreed with the Contractor at call off. The work may be phased on certain assignments and agreed deadlines may arise at commencement or during the assignment which are expected to be met on time. Any queries in relation to the scope should be raised with the Authority early, in order to ensure the allocated assurance or audit work assignment is completed as expected Where specified in the Engagement letter, Contractors are required to demonstrate a practical understanding of Education Providers as defined in the framework terms in relation to the call off. Ensure that the completion of all work is in accordance with the ESFA requirements, using agreed working papers or testing schedules and outcomes reported using agreed templates and to agreed deadlines as set out in the Engagement letter. It should be noted that the final report may be referred to in subsequent legal proceedings. The ESFA may also be required to share the final report with other government departments, agencies, or its own Auditors (NAO or GIAA). Contractors will be expected to have a practical understanding of the funding methodology and learner data collections where required for the particular services as set out in the Engagement letter.

Documentation Review. Flextronics will provide a standard Certificate of Compliance signed by an authorized representative of Flextronics confirming that the Products have been manufactured in accordance with the Specifications. PRODUCT DISPOSITION Release of the Product is the responsibility of Flextronics. Flextronics will release the Product in accordance with the Specifications.

Documentation Review. Entel will review "as-built" documentation -------------------- prepared by third party Suppliers, verify completion of third party supplier contractual requirements, and recommend to Triton to proceed with final payment based on acceptance criteria.

Documentation Review. MSP agrees that it has reviewed the Documentation relating to Continuum SaaS Backup, including but not limited to online user guides outlining proper installation and use of Continuum SaaS Backup.