Environmental Evaluation Clause Samples

Environmental Evaluation. Within ninety (90) days of any change in the Fuel Facility Manager (and the Facility Manager, if the Facility Manager is responsible for the QTA Equipment and Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment), the Operators shall, at their sole cost and expense though the in-coming or out-going Fuel Facility Manager, conduct an Environmental Assessment of the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site and specifically the Fuel Facilities, the QTA Equipment and the Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment to identify, to extent practicable, the nature and extent of any Hazardous Substances, if any, present on the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site since the Pre-Lease Environmental Evaluation or any prior Environmental Assessment pursuant to this Section 19.1.1.

Environmental Evaluation. The Concession Contractor shall be evaluated by Reclamation on its environmental performance under this Concession Contract including, without limitation, compliance with the approved EMP and on the following criteria. 1. Hazardous wastes are properly identified and managed. 2. An Oil and Hazardous Substance Spill Contingency Plan is in place; all employees are trained in first response procedures; Reclamation and appropriate regulatory authorities are notified of any spill or release of a hazardous substance. 3. A hazardous waste minimization strategy is in place, reporting requirements are met, and progress is being made toward reduction goals. 4. Areas of contamination caused by or attributable to the Concession Contractor are cleaned up to the satisfaction of Reclamation and regulatory authorities. 5. Hazardous material inventories and use records are maintained and provided to Reclamation. Hazardous materials are stored and handled in a manner that minimizes the potential for spill or release. 6. A solid waste minimization strategy is in place, waste generation information is provided to Reclamation, and progress is being made toward waste reduction goals. 7. An affirmative procurement program is in place to ensure that, where available, products containing recycled material or materials that are environmentally preferable are preferentially acquired (Green Procurement). 8. The Concession Contractor will conserve energy and improve energy efficiency of operations being implemented. Every effort will be made to ensure that environmentally safe and sustainable energy sources are used. A program to reduce overall energy consumption is documented and actively pursued. 9. The goals and objectives of the area’s water conservation program are being met. 10. Prior written approval has been obtained from Reclamation for implementation of any pesticide, herbicide, or vector control action.

Environmental Evaluation. The environmental information developed in tasks 4.1 and 4.2 will inform a meeting with WSDOT Local Programs to introduce the project and discuss the NEPA actions needed to advance the project from TSL to final design and permitting. Specific activities will include: • Conduct an early NEPA scoping meeting with WSDOT Local Programs to review the project and discuss whether it will qualify for a Categorical Exclusion or would an additional environmental review be warranted. This meeting would occur after sufficient project details and potential environmental impacts have been identified. The WSDOT preliminary review findings will be included in the TSL document. • Review project documents from other disciplines under this scope and prepare summary project information to include: • Exhibit and associated summary narrative indicating the proposed project action and the location and extent of potential environmental impacts. The narrative will provide environmental considerations for other disciplines to consider in making TS&L decisions. • List the known and anticipated future documentation necessary to complete a final NEPA review and obtain environmental permits to support project construction. This information will include the list of anticipated permits and the actions and future documentation needed (outside of this scope) to complete the environmental review and permitting process. • Specific environmental elements anticipated under this scope of services include: o Endangered species preliminary evaluation (relevant to stormwater discharges) o Cultural and Historic Structural Resources Assessment o Hazardous Materials and contaminated site evaluation o Visual impacts preliminary evaluation o Land use compatibility and encumbrance o Preliminary noise, vibration, and air quality impacts evaluation o 4(f)/6(f) preliminary risk evaluation of parkland impacts o Critical Areas reconnaissance, delineation, and preliminary impacts evaluation (if any) o Potential impacts and mitigation summary o Environmental Justice impacts preliminary evaluation o Shoreline Management Act preliminary evaluation • Permitting requirements, lead agencies, permitting schedule, possible mitigation requirements, and other permit commitments anticipated for the design and construction of the new bridge. • Two meetings with the AGENCY and project team to discuss the environmental evaluation and potential impacts. • One meeting with WSDOT local programs, including one preparatory sess...

Environmental Evaluation. Great American has completed an environmental evaluation of the ▇▇▇▇▇ Mine and accepts the ▇▇▇▇▇ Mine in its current environmental condition. In the event Great American exercises its Option, Great American shall assume all of ▇▇▇▇▇' environmental reclamation and clean-up liabilities which are not covered by the Vista Lease, including environmental conditions that pre-dates the Effective Date of this Agreement. Great American shall reclaim any disturbance, including drilling, created by its activities under this Agreement in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the appropriate state and federal agencies.

Environmental Evaluation. In terms of environmental impact, the automatic in-situ consolidation of thermoplastic materials manufacturing process represents an alternative, very beneficial in terms environmental sustainability, to autoclave manufacturing processes (low environmentally optimized), and involve significant advantages in terms of environmental sustainability Continuing with the approach set out in the D1.1 technical report ref[4], has been tested the substantial benefits in terms of composite and ancillary material wastes, energy saving, natural resources outcome and recyclability. In addition this processing methodology allows complying with legal requirements. In addition, thermoplastics can be remolded and recycled directly by remelting heating up above a specific temperature, without negatively affecting the material’s physical properties. This characteristic allows, by one hand, to increase the lifetime of the product, thanks to the ability to reprocess and repair some defective parts, and by other, recycling the end life structure. An impact assessment has been performed by comparison between TS ATL+AC and TP ISC achieving the following results on a unitary 1000x1000 mm Omega-stiffened flat panel, a simplification of a representative typical A/C structure: By means of a standardized and structured analysis has been demonstrated that ISC process can be considered to be eco-friendly and green, above all, in terms of energies, wastes, and materials. Current and future waste management and environmental legislations require all materials to be properly recovered and recycled. Potential advantages for the aerospace sector, as we have seen, lie in the lower energy and auxiliary materials consumption, the possibility of recycling, and longer live cycle. · Decreasing energy consumption · Reduce waste · Material intakes · Increasing the potential recyclability (prepreg and final structure) · Increasing the lifetime of the structure (reprocessing and reparability) · Complexity of process (high temperature)

Environmental Evaluation. PBS will identify and map the extent of wetlands within the project area and collect enough information to accurately rate the wetlands using the Washington Department of Ecology’s Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Wetland boundaries will be recorded in the field using mapping grade GPS receiver with +/‐ 3 feet of accuracy. The Ordinary High‐Water Mark (OHWM) of the unnamed tributary to the East Fork ▇▇▇▇▇ River will be identified and flagged in the field for subsequent survey. • A brief memorandum that details the results of the field work and summarizes the mapped resources and buffers will be completed. A graphic containing the extents and appropriate buffers from these features will be developed. Digital files of the mapped resources and buffers will be supplied to the engineering team for use in preliminary design and alternative analysis. • Mapped wetlands and OHWM • Critical area summarization memo and graphic • Digital boundaries for wetlands, OHWM, and buffers • Consultation as needed with engineering staff regarding potential impacts / mitigation permitting

Environmental Evaluation. “Environmental Evaluation” shall mean that limited review of higher-risk operational environmental practices of the Incumbent Companies conducted on behalf of the Port prior to the Commencement Date of the Lease.

Environmental Evaluation. Buyer may (at its option and expense) retain a qualified and recognized environmental audit and compliance review firm to perform an environmental evaluation of the properties of the Subsidiaries (the "Environmental Evaluation"). The scope of the Environmental Evaluation shall generally be that of a Phase One study. Buyer must complete such Environmental Evaluation no later than September 15, 1995.

Environmental Evaluation. FNI will evaluate the project corridor for regulatory permitting requirements primarily related to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Section 404) and other know permits. This information will be utilized to evaluate the project alignment to minimize regulatory requirements for the project. 3.1 Conduct Pedestrian Survey • FNI’s environmental scientist will conduct a pedestrian survey along the initial trail alignment (including approximately 100 feet on either side of the alignment) project limits to document existing environmental conditions and assess potential environmental impacts. Prior to the site visit, environmental scientists will assemble and review data such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps, and soils data. The presence and locations of waterbodies, including wetlands, potential federally-listed threatened and endangered species habitat, and vegetation cover types will be identified within the project area.