Evaluation and Report Sample Clauses
Evaluation and Report. On completion of Your Program, You will receive an evaluation from your Host Organization supervisor and an End of Program Report.
Evaluation and Report. Upon the completion of authorized test and sampling procedures the consultant will issue a written report supplementing the Phase II report and detail, at a minimum, the following: • Results of each individual test, sampling, or monitoring procedure. • Comparison of results to standards. • Conclusions and further recommendations, as appropriate.
Evaluation and Report. Upon the completion of authorized test and sampling procedures the consultant will issue a written report supplementing the Phase I report and detail, at a minimum, the following: • Results of each individual test, sampling, or monitoring procedure. • Comparison of results to standards. • Conclusions and further recommendations, if appropriate. Assess the extent and degree of contamination identified at the site, in accordance with applicable local, state, or federal guidelines.
1. Prior to undertaking any Phase III investigation, the consultant must detail: • The type, number and description of each recommended test or monitoring procedure. • The proposed location(s) of the proposed tests. • The time required to perform each of the procedures and the analysis of results. • The costs involved to complete and analyze the results for each of the tests.
Evaluation and Report. On completion of Your Program, You will receive an evaluation from your Host Organization supervisor and an End of Program Report.
4. Placements and Placement Criteria
4.1 You will be able to choose from one of four Career Groups (engineering & computer science, business & finance, marketing & creative industries, and social-impact companies/NGOs) in your application form. We will endeavour to place You in a Host Organization that corresponds with your preferred Career Group in a team composed of at least 3 Participants (a “Cohort”). Where possible, we will endeavour to place you in a cohort with other Participants from your School, but where this is not possible we may place you with other Participants.
Evaluation and Report. The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an evaluation of the pilot projects conducted under this section. Not later than 12 months after the date on which the pilot projects are completed, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on the evalua- tion.
Evaluation and Report. These tests shall be billed based on the length of time it takes the client to complete the assessment, and the maximum charge shall not exceed $400.00 per evaluation.
Evaluation and Report. On completion of Your Program, You will receive an evaluation from your Host Organization supervisor and an End of Program Report.
4. Placements and Placement Criteria
4.1 You will be able to choose from one of four Career Groups (engineering & computer science, business & finance, marketing & creative industries, and social-impact companies/NGOs) in your application form. We will place You in a Host Organization that corresponds with your preferred Career Group.
4.2 You will be required to pay the remainder of Your Program Fee at least 2 weeks prior to your Program Start Date. We will not confirm a Placement for You until We have received payment of the full Program Fee.
4.3 We will endeavor to inform You of Your Placement with a Host Organization at least one
(1) week before your Program Start Date, however, delays to this timeline can occur and a confirmed Placement is guaranteed prior to your Program Start Date.
Evaluation and Report. By 1 June 2025[], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. That report shall assess how effectively this Regulation and the []delegated acts adopted pursuant thereto have [] led end[] users to choose higher-performing tyres, taking into account its impacts on business, fuel consumption, safety, greenhouse gas emissions, consumer awareness and market surveillance activities. It shall also assess the costs and benefits of mandatory independent [] third- party verification of the information provided in the label, taking also into account the experience with the broader framework provided by Regulation (EC) No 661/2009.
Evaluation and Report. Upon completion of the field exploration, evaluate the data obtained and prepare a written report for the site summarizing the findings, along with conclusions and recommendations. The written report will include the following: ▪ A description of the site, fieldwork, laboratory testing and general soil conditions encountered, as well as a Boring Location Plan, and individual Test Boring Records. ▪ Site preparation considerations that include geotechnical discussions regarding site stripping and subgrade preparation. ▪ Recommendations for controlling groundwater and/or run-off during construction, and the need for a permanent dewatering system based on the anticipated post construction groundwater levels. ▪ Foundation system recommendations for the proposed buildings, including an allowable foundation capacity, a recommended bearing depth, and installation considerations. ▪ Slab-on-grade construction considerations based upon geotechnical findings, including the need for a sub-slab vapor barrier or capillary layer. ▪ Recommended pavement sections based on provided or assumed traffic loading and subgrade strengths estimate from correlation with SPT, laboratory data, and soils types collected from the test borings. ▪ Stormwater Management Facility design parameters with sand chimney recommendations per NWFWMD ERP requirements. ▪ Suitability of onsite soils for reuse as structural fill and backfill. Additionally, the criteria for suitable fill materials will be provided. ▪ Recommended quality control measures (i.e. sampling, testing, and inspection requirements) for site grading and foundation construction.
Evaluation and Report. The Agencies agree to conduct an ongoing evaluation on the effectiveness of the grant of priority to severe hardship providers and identify systemic and procedural issues that may require corrective administrative or legislative action and will report such findings to the House Special Committee on Fee-For-Service Initiatives (or its successor in the 94th General Assembly, if any), the Governor, the Senate Health & Human Services Committee, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House and the Minority Leaders of the House and Senate by March 31, 2005 with a further report by September 30, 2005.