Evaluation and Research Sample Clauses

The Evaluation and Research clause establishes the terms under which data, information, or outcomes related to a project or service may be collected, analyzed, and used for assessment or research purposes. Typically, this clause outlines the scope of permissible evaluation activities, such as monitoring program effectiveness, conducting surveys, or analyzing user data, and may specify requirements for confidentiality, consent, or reporting. Its core function is to ensure that all parties understand how evaluation and research activities will be conducted, thereby promoting transparency and protecting the interests of those involved.
Evaluation and Research. The Agency agrees to participate in research, evaluation studies, or needs assessments sponsored by the Recipient, the Health Resources & Services Administration (“HRSA”), or the HIV/AIDS Health Services Planning Council (hereinafter referred to as “Planning Council”) in order to evaluate the effect of Consumer service activities, or on the appropriateness and quality of Services. In addition, the Agency agrees to actively participate in on-going meetings or task forces aimed to increase, enhance, and maintain coordination and collaboration among HIV/AIDS related health and support agencies. The Agency shall notify the Recipient in advance of any research or studies being conducted or participated in by the Agency that may involve any Consumers receiving ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Part A funded services or Services under this Contract.
View SourceView Similar (13)
Evaluation and Research. Mental health professionals systematically monitor and evaluate their clinical practice, consistent with the National Standards for Mental Health Services and relevant professional standards to ensure the best possible outcomes for consumers, family members and/or carers.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Evaluation and Research. This workstream is led by the University of Kent we have developed a evaluation framework that will enable us to implement and evaluate all the changes to health and social care that we make ensuring that we achieve the desired patient outcomes.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation and Research. If you don't have a copy of the NASW Code of Ethics, revised in 1999, you can download a copy from NASW, ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ or you can be connected via the NASW/CT website, ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ or if you don't have access to the Internet, you can request a single copy from the chapter office by calling (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇. The information presented here is based on the current status of Connecticut and may be subject to change. This fact sheet is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. tips.
View Source
Evaluation and Research. Our Business Intelligence Unit continues to undertake cross analysis of all surveys and qualitative research with potential, current and past students to highlight differences in requirements, satisfaction and experiences of UEA provision for different student groups. In addition to the Non-Academic Experience Survey, other internal surveys which will continue to be analysed in this way include the Reasons for Choice Survey (annual survey of enquirers, applicants and offer holders, exploring decision making and information sources used), Open Day and Applicant Day surveys and monitoring of National Student Survey and UK Engagement Survey responses. In 2015/16, we undertook a tracker project consisting of qualitative interviews with a small (30 students) panel of 1st and 2nd year home undergraduate students across the academic year following their experience of a year at UEA. This helped us to better our understanding of the interplay between different positive and negative factors in the retention and success of our students and any differences in the experience of choosing, studying at and living at UEA between WP and non-WP students. To further our understanding, monitor changes in needs and evaluate impact of newly implemented activity, we have furthered this work by introducing a WP specific group into our annual New Student Focus Group Project and will continue to run the full tracker project every other year. In 2015/2016 UEA’s Business Intelligence Unit also launched an ongoing Exit Survey with students who have withdrawn from the institution or academically failed. At the end of the academic year 2016/17, full statistical analysis of two years’ worth of data will be undertaken including cross analysis by widening participation characteristics. Dashboarding will be designed to allow for live monitoring of trends. This will enable the University to learn more about the reasons behind the non-continuation of widening participation students and take action to address specific trends and issues. Following a successful set of five short term fellowships into specific WP issues, we plan to utilise further the wealth of academic expertise within UEA through funding colleagues in our School of Education and Life Long Learning to undertake an initial scoping review (2016/17) and then a more targeted systematic review (2017/18) into key issues for the success of widening participation students. In 2018/19, we plan to fund further research to investigate key i...
View Source

Related to Evaluation and Research

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Evaluation of Students A teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of students within the grading policies of the District based upon professional judgment of available criteria pertinent to any given subject area or activity for which the teacher is responsible. No grade or evaluation shall be changed without consultation with the teacher.

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

  • Further information, mediation and review Review organisation: The High Court of Ireland Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents: The Office of Government Procurement Organisation receiving requests to participate: The Office of Government Procurement Organisation processing tenders: The Office of Government Procurement ▇▇▇ eSender: European Dynamics S.A.

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22 2.24.2 The tender evaluation committee shall evaluate the tender within 30 days of the validity period from the date of opening the tender. 2.24.3 A tenderer who gives false information in the tender document about its qualification or who refuses to enter into a contract after notification of contract award shall be considered for debarment from participating in future public procurement.