Evaluation Coordination Sample Clauses

The Evaluation Coordination clause establishes the procedures and responsibilities for organizing and managing the assessment of a product, service, or project. Typically, it outlines how parties will communicate, schedule, and share information relevant to the evaluation process, and may designate specific individuals or teams to oversee coordination efforts. By clearly defining these roles and processes, the clause ensures that evaluations are conducted efficiently and collaboratively, minimizing misunderstandings and delays.
Evaluation Coordination. The evaluation process shall be a collaborative one, and shall be supervised and coordinated at each college by a Faculty Evaluation Coordinator to be mutually agreed upon by the College President and the Guild. The duties of the Faculty Evaluation Coordinator shall include meeting with all new faculty and administrators to review the evaluation system, which includes the Continuing Education Counselors and Administrators, updating and maintaining the faculty evaluation database, providing appropriate managers with lists of all faculty to be evaluated in each academic year prior to the beginning of the third (3rd) week of each semester, overseeing the scheduling of peer and student evaluation of all faculty, securing and distributing student evaluation forms as specified in Section 15.1.15 of this Article, serving as a liaison with administration, providing any formal training necessary and any information requested by raters, and attending to general administrative details. The Faculty Evaluation Coordinator will work under the supervision of the College President or his/her designee and may reasonably utilize the support services of the College. The Faculty Evaluation Coordinator at each campus, if a faculty member, shall receive a minimum of 20% (twenty percent) reassigned time. Continuing Education Counselors will be included under the responsibility of the Continuing Education President. For Continuing Education Counselors, the “appropriate” Vice President and President shall be the Continuing Education Vice President and President; for faculty assigned to the District Office the responsible Vice Chancellor will serve as the “appropriate” President. For purposes of tenure and promotional review, the Tenure and Promotional Review Committee (TPRC) responsibility for Continuing Education Counselors will be assigned as follows: City College TPRC: ECC, Centre City/▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Campus, Mid City Center; Mesa College TPRC: Mesa College CE Campus, North City Campus, West City Campus, all DSPS Counselors assigned to any Continuing Education site or the District Office.
View SourceView Similar (8)

Related to Evaluation Coordination

  • Project Management and Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality of and consistency of work and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Project Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality and consistency of deliverables and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Care Coordination Care coordination is defined as the organized delivery of member care activities between two (2) or more participants (including the member) involved in a member’s care to facilitate the appropriate delivery of health care services. Organizing care involves the marshaling of personnel and other resources needed to carry out all medically necessary member care activities and is often managed by the exchange of information among participants responsible for different aspects of care.

  • Cooperation and Coordination The Parties acknowledge and agree that it is their mutual objective and intent to minimize, to the extent feasible and legal, taxes payable with respect to their collaborative efforts under this Agreement and that they shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate and coordinate with each other to achieve such objective.

  • Utility Coordination Identify all potential utility conflicts and provide preliminary office check plans showing the problem locations, posted to the City’s FTP site. Plans will clearly identify specific utility company facilities by color and by name (i.e. not just “gas” or “fiber optic”). ENGINEER shall include a conflict list for each utility, also posted to the FTP site. ENGINEER shall meet with utility company representatives to review plans and utility verification forms (Attachment No. 3 to Exhibit “A”) at each milestone date and as directed by the CITY and as determined necessary by the ENGINEER. This in- formation will be compiled into a summary report (Attachment No. 4 to Exhibit “A” also available on the City’s FTP site) maintained and updated by ENGINEER as necessary to present a cohesive and reflective status of utilities, and provided to the City as necessary. ENGINEER shall maintain involvement with utility companies until all conflicts have been resolved (not just identified). When appropriate, the City Engineer will approve the identification on plans of conflicts to be resolved during construction. ENGINEER shall meet with involved utility company/ies and project contractor to resolve any conflicts with utilities that occur during construction.