Evaluation Timetable Clause Samples

The Evaluation Timetable clause establishes a schedule for assessing performance, deliverables, or compliance within a contract. It typically outlines specific dates, intervals, or milestones when evaluations will occur, and may detail the procedures or criteria used during these assessments. By providing a clear timeline, this clause ensures that both parties are aware of when evaluations will take place, promoting accountability and helping to identify and address issues in a timely manner.
Evaluation Timetable. 2.7.1 The dates and timelines for the various procedures described in this section are recommendations. Unless there are extenuating circumstances, most procedures may normally be completed before the recommended deadlines.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Evaluation Timetable. 8.18.1 The date and timelines for the various procedures described in this section are recommendations. Changes in the timeline appropriate to 8-week classes will be made by the supervising administrator. Unless there are extenuating circumstances, most procedures may normally be completed before the recommended deadlines.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Evaluation Timetable a. Probationary Teachers on a contract of more than four-tenths (.4) shall be evaluated each contract year at least twice; on or before December 15 and on or before February 15. Teachers who are on a contract of two-tenths (.2) to four-tenths (.4) shall be evaluated one (1) time each year on or before February 15. During the school year in which an issue of a probationary teacher's continuing employment status is raised by the consideration of the commencement of nonrenewal proceedings pursuant to Section IV-I an additional final evaluation shall be completed on or before the last day in February. b. Nonprobationary Teachers shall be evaluated by May 15 for the year the evaluation is applicable. During a school year in which an issue of an employee's continuing employment status is raised by the commencement of nonrenewal proceedings pursuant to Section IV-J, the evaluation shall be completed no later than February 15 of the then current school year. c. The evaluator(s) may file, and the teacher may request, a special evaluation at a time other than the specified times for evaluations.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Timetable. 2.7.1 The dates and timelines for the various procedures described in this section are recommendations. Unless there are extenuating circumstances, most procedures may normally be completed before the recommended deadlines. 2.7.2 Contract Teachers/Master Teachers 2.7.2.1 Submission The evaluation(s) and recommendation(s) for Contract I will be submitted to the Executive Director of Child Development Services by November 15 and February 15 of the first year. Evaluations for Contract II, III A & B must be submitted by February 15 in each subsequent year. Recommendations will be sent to the Chancellor in time for the first Board meeting in March. 2.7.2.2 For the purpose of this article, a unit member must serve 75% of a school year in order for that year to count as a year of service toward tenure.
View Source
Evaluation Timetable. 2.7.1 The dates and timelines for the various procedures described in this section are recommendations. Unless there are extenuating circumstances, most procedures may normally be completed before the recommended deadlines. 2.7.2 Contract Teachers/Master Teachers 2.7.2.1 Submission The evaluation(s) and recommendation(s) for Contract I will be submitted to the Executive Director of Child Development Services by November 15 and February 15 of the first year. Evaluations for Contract II, III must be submitted by February 15 in each subsequent year. Recommendations will be sent to the Chancellor in time for the first Board meeting in March. 2.7.2.2 For the purpose of this article, a unit member must serve 75% of a school year in order for that year to count as a year of service toward tenure. 2.7.2.3 Unit members hired during the 1998/99 school year shall be considered to be employed in Contract I status. Unit members hired during the 1997/98 school year shall be considered to be employed in Contract II status, assuming the service requirement in Section
View Source
Evaluation Timetable a. Probationary Teachers on a contract of more than four-tenths (.4) shall be evaluated each contract year at least twice; on or before December 15 and on or before February 15. Teachers who are on a contract of two-tenths (.2) to four-tenths (.4) shall be evaluated one
View Source
Evaluation Timetable 
View SourceView Similar (6)

Related to Evaluation Timetable

  • Evaluation Period Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis are time-limited and will terminate immediately upon the earlier of (i) the trial end date as specified in an Order Form or other document executed by the parties regarding such trial, or (ii) the start date of when Customer purchases a right to use such Services on a non-Trial Basis, or (iii) the date when QuoVadis terminates Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis (which QuoVadis may do at any time in its sole discretion). Customer must cease using the Services on a Trial Basis upon any such termination.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.