Evaluator completes Educator Plans November Sample Clauses

This clause requires the evaluator to finalize and complete all Educator Plans by the month of November. In practice, this means that the evaluator must review, assess, and document the progress or status of each educator's plan within this specified timeframe, ensuring that all necessary evaluations and feedback are provided before the deadline. The core function of this clause is to establish a clear timeline for the completion of educator evaluations, promoting timely feedback and supporting effective planning for the remainder of the academic year.
Evaluator completes Educator Plans November. 1 Evaluator should complete first observation of each Educator November 15 Educator submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) *or four weeks before Formative Assessment Report date established by Evaluator January 5* Evaluator should complete mid-cycle Formative Assessment Reports for Educators on one-year Educator Plans February 1 Evaluator holds Formative Assessment Meetings if requested by either Evaluator or Educator February 15 Educator submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) *or 4 weeks prior to Summative Evaluation Report date established by Evaluator April 20* Evaluator completes Summative Evaluation Report May 15 Evaluator meets with Educators whose overall Summative Evaluation ratings are Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory Within 10 school days of May 15 Evaluator meets with Educators whose ratings are proficient or exemplary at request of Evaluator or Educator June 10 or at least 5 school days before the last Educator work day Educator signs Summative Evaluation Report and adds response, if any, within 5 school days of receipt June 15 or at least 5 school days before the last Educator work day
View SourceView Similar (11)
Evaluator completes Educator Plans November. 1 Evaluator should complete first observation of each Educator November 15 Educator submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) January 1 Evaluator should complete mid-cycle Formative Assessment Reports for Educators on one-year Educator Plans February 15 Evaluator holds Formative Assessment Meetings if requested by either Evaluator or Educator Upon Request Educator submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) April 1
View Source
Evaluator completes Educator Plans November. 15 Evaluator should complete first observation of each Educator December 1 Educator on Developing Educator Plan or Directed Growth Plan submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) January 15 Evaluator should complete mid-cycle Formative Assessment Reports for Educators on one-year Educator Plans. Evaluators should complete second observation of each educator. February 1 Evaluator holds Formative Assessment Meetings if requested by either Evaluator or Educator. February 15 Evaluator should complete third observation of each Educator April 1 Educator submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) Evaluator should complete fourth observation of first year Educator May 1 Evaluator meets with Educators whose overall Summative Evaluation ratings are Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory May 15 Evaluator completes Summative Evaluation Report June 1 Evaluator meets with Educators whose ratings are Proficient or Exemplary at request of Evaluator or Educator June 1 Educator signs Summative Evaluation Report and adds response, if any within 10 school days of receipt June 15 Superintendent, principal or designee meets with evaluators and educators to explain evaluation process September 15 Educator submits self-assessment and proposed goals October 15 (Nov. 1 in 2012) Evaluator meets with Educators in teams or individually to establish Educator Plans (Educator Plan may be established at Summative Evaluation Report meeting in prior school year) November 1 Evaluator completes Educator Plans November 15 Evaluator completes observation(s): At least one (1) formal or informal observation during the 2-year cycle Any time during the 2- year evaluation cycle Educator submits evidence on parent outreach, professional growth, progress on goals (and other standards, if desired) May 15 Evaluator meets with Educators whose overall Formative or Summative Evaluation ratings are Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory May 15 Evaluator completes Formative Evaluation Report, and provides a copy to the Educator, and conducts Formative Evaluation Meeting, if any June 1 of Year 1 Evaluator completes Summative Evaluation Report, and provides a copy to the Educator, and conducts Summative Evaluation Meeting, if any June 1 of Year 2 Evaluator and Educator sign Formative or Summative Evaluation Report June 15 of Year 2 The timeline for Educators on Plans of less than one ...
View Source
Evaluator completes Educator Plans November. 1 Nov. 1
View Source
Evaluator completes Educator Plans November. 1 Evaluator completes first observation of each Educator November 15 Evaluator completes mid-cycle Formative Assessment Reports for Educators on one-year Educator Plans February 2 Evaluator holds Formative Assessment Meetings if requested by either Evaluator or Educator February 28 Evaluator completes Summative Evaluation Report May 15 Evaluator meets with Educators whose overall Summative Evaluation ratings are Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory June 1 Evaluator meets with Educators whose ratings are proficient or exemplary at request of Evaluator or Educator June 10 Educator signs Summative Evaluation Report and adds response, if any June 15
View Source

Related to Evaluator completes Educator Plans November

  • Educator Plans General A) Educator Plans shall be designed to provide Educators with feedback for improvement, professional growth, and leadership; and to ensure Educator effectiveness and overall system accountability. The Plan must be aligned to the standards and indicators and be consistent with district and school goals. B) The Educator Plan shall include, but is not limited to: i) At least one goal related to improvement of practice tied to one or more Performance Standards; ii) At least one goal for the improvement the learning, growth and achievement of the students under the Educator’s responsibility; iii) An outline of actions the Educator must take to attain the goals and benchmarks to assess progress. Actions must include specified professional development and learning activities that the Educator will participate in as a means of obtaining the goals, as well as other support that may be suggested by the Evaluator or provided by the school or district. Examples may include but are not limited to coursework, self-study, action research, curriculum development, study groups with peers, and implementing new programs. C) It is the Educator’s responsibility to attain the goals in the Plan and to participate in any trainings and professional development provided through the state, district, or other providers in accordance with the Educator Plan.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. Both the Board and the Association encourage teachers to seek professional improvement. In order to assist teachers in extending and improving their skills the following plan will be implemented. B. All Teachers will be encouraged to earn a Masters degree or coursework toward additional certification that is in the field of education and within a teacher's discipline, or in an area that is beneficial to the school. C. The Board will pay teacher's expenses for undergraduate and/or graduate credits, specialty and additional endorsements under the following conditions. 1. In allocating budgeted funds priority will be given to the teachers in a “masters” program and those teachers who need to complete coursework for certification. 2. All courses must be approved, in advance, by the Superintendent. Courses for recertification purposes must be approved in advance by the certification committee and the superintendent. The teacher shall receive a written reply from the Superintendent within ten (10) days of application for course approval (See Appendix D). 3. Each teacher will be eligible for up to six (6) semester hours of credit or, if enrolled in a matriculated, organized program, 12 semester hours of credit for undergraduate will be paid if part of a graduate program or graduate courses per contract year. The Superintendent reserves the right to request intent to take courses prior to final budget preparation. Failure to communicate such intent at the time of the Superintendent’s request may jeopardize course reimbursement due to a lack of funding. 4. The administration will pay in advance the cost of the course. Presentation of evidence of satisfactory completion of the course (A grade of B or better) is the responsibility of the teacher. In the event the course is not completed or not completed satisfactorily, the teacher will refund the payment received in advance and in accordance with Appendix D – attached. 5. Teachers who resign shall not be eligible for reimbursement after the date of resignation Teachers who have been reimbursed for any course work toward securing a masters within the last two (2) years of employment shall be required to continue their service to RSU # 78 for an additional two (2) years (twenty-four months) or will be required to reimburse the district the cost associated with Masters courses taken prior to departing, Such reimbursement to the district shall be remitted via payroll deductions as arranged between the District and employee, unless the failure to continue employment is due to illness, disability, death, or reduction of position. 6. Reimbursement will only be for tuition and fees. It will not include reimbursement for mileage, books and other expenses unless the teacher is required to take the course by the administration.

  • Construction Management Plan Contractor shall prepare and furnish to the Owner a thorough and complete plan for the management of the Project from issuance of the Proceed Order through the issuance of the Design Professional's Certificate of Material Completion. Such plan shall include, without limitation, an estimate of the manpower requirements for each trade and the anticipated availability of such manpower, a schedule prepared using the critical path method that will amplify and support the schedule required in Article 2.1.5 below, and the Submittal Schedule as required in Article 2.2.3. The Contractor shall include in his plan the names and resumés of the Project Superintendent, Project Manager and the person in charge of Safety.

  • Project Management Plan Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan and

  • SHAM CONTRACTING (a) The Parties to this Agreement acknowledge that sham contracting has the potential to undermine fair employment practices, erode Employee entitlements and affect the job security of Employees covered by this Agreement. A sham contracting arrangement includes where an employer attempts to disguise an employment relationship as an independent contracting arrangement. This is usually done for the purposes of avoiding responsibility for employee entitlements. (b) In this clause, "sham contracting" is where: (i) an employer employs, or proposes to employ, an individual, representing to the individual that the contract of employment under which the individual is, or would be, employed by the employer is a contract for services under which the individual performs, or would perform, work as an independent contractor; (ii) an employer dismisses, or threatens to dismiss, an individual who is an employee of the employer and performs particular work for the employer in order to engage the individual as an independent contractor to perform the same, or substantially the same, work under a contract for services; or (iii) an employer employs, or has at any time employed, an individual to perform particular work makes a statement that the employer knows is false in order to persuade or influence the individual to enter into a contract for services under which the individual will perform, as an independent contractor, the same, or substantially the same, work for the employer. (c) Clause 16.6(b)(i) does not apply if the employer proves that, when the representation was made, the employer did not know and was not reckless as to whether the contract was a contract of employment rather than a contract for services. (d) Any use of sham contracting is a breach of this Agreement. (e) Where a sham contracting arrangement has been reasonably alleged and is unable to be resolved at the workplace level, any Party may refer the allegation directly to the Disputes Panel for conciliation and/or resolution under clause 11 of this Agreement. All Parties will cooperate with the requests of the Disputes Panel including requests to provide substantiating information or undertaking an independent audit of their arrangements. For the avoidance of doubt, an affected Employee may appoint a representative in relation to such matters. (f) Where the sham contracting allegation exists on the Employer’s Project, the Employer will make itself available to assist the disputes resolution procedure. (g) Where the Disputes Panel Chair deems it necessary due to seriousness of the allegations and/or their findings, the Chair may refer the matter to the appropriate government authority. (h) Where it is agreed or determined by the Disputes Panel or FWC that a sham contract was in place and the person was in fact an Employee under this Agreement, the calculation for back pay will be calculated on the basis of the hourly rate contained in this Agreement plus the site allowance (if applicable), plus the multi-storey allowance and an additional 75% loading to cover entitlements other than CBUS and Incolink. Any difference between the hourly rate paid to the Employee, plus CBUS and Incolink will form the settlement for breach of this clause. The affected Employee will be re-inducted and fully informed of their entitlements under this Agreement and the Fair Work Act. (i) The Employer must ensure that a person engaged to undertake building work as an Employee or as an independent contractor is lawfully entitled to be so engaged under Australian law. (j) The Employer agrees that the Employees will be paid in accordance with the applicable wage rates and allowances as prescribed in this Agreement. (k) The Employer in particular acknowledges the Sham Contracting Compliance Checklist, as attached at Appendix L, provides a useful tool to ensure ongoing compliance.