Final Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

The Final Evaluation Process clause outlines the procedures and criteria for assessing the completion or quality of work at the end of a project or contract. Typically, this clause specifies who is responsible for conducting the evaluation, the standards or benchmarks to be used, and the steps to resolve any disputes regarding the outcome. Its core function is to ensure an objective and transparent assessment, providing a clear basis for acceptance, payment, or further action, and thereby minimizing misunderstandings between the parties.
Final Evaluation Process. 12.6.1 A meeting shall be held with each unit member to discuss the Final Evaluation of the certificated unit member before the last scheduled school day and may include comments on: • Evaluation Criteria (as defined in Article 12.2.1) • Contributions to the total school program • Areas of exceptional performance • Areas for growth and improvement • Areas of unsatisfactory performance • Specific improvement plan suggestions, if appropriate 12.6.1.1 Upon request by the unit member to the evaluator, the unit member shall be provided a copy of the Formal Evaluation at least one (1) working day prior to the Evaluation Conference. 12.6.1.2 If areas of Unsatisfactory Performance are identified on the Final Evaluation, the unit member shall receive a copy of the Final Evaluation at least one (1) day prior to the conference.
View SourceView Similar (14)
Final Evaluation Process. An employee’s overall performance rating will be a result of application of standards of performance to the employee’s performance on critical elements of the employee’s duties and responsibilities. The ratings on appraisal factors – manner of performance will be accomplished at the same time and will be identified against any applicable performance element(s) as explained in the instructions for AF Form 860a. The rating of elements will include designation of meets or does not meet, applied to each element identified on the rating form. After completion of the appraisal of each element, an overall rating of total performance will be designated.
View Source

Related to Final Evaluation Process

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.