Final Evaluation Summary Clause Samples

The Final Evaluation Summary clause outlines the requirement for a comprehensive assessment at the conclusion of a project or contractual engagement. This clause typically mandates that a summary report be prepared, detailing the outcomes, performance metrics, and any lessons learned during the course of the work. By formalizing the process of reviewing and documenting results, the clause ensures accountability and provides a clear record for both parties, helping to resolve any disputes and inform future projects.
Final Evaluation Summary. The written Final Evaluation Summary shall be completed and a copy of the summary shall be provided to the Evaluatee at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the last day scheduled on the school calendar adopted by the governing board. Whenever possible, the Evaluation Conference shall be held at the time the Final Evaluation Summary is provided the employee. In any event, no later than the last school day scheduled on the school calendar, a meeting shall be held between the Evaluatee and the Prime Evaluator to discuss the evaluation. The steps to be used in preparing the Final Evaluation Summary shall be as follows: A. In preparing the Final Evaluation Summary the prime Evaluator shall indicate whether the majority of the objectives for each standard have been rated at “Satisfactory” or above as indicated on the Observation Form in order to meet the standard. B. During the final evaluation conference, the Prime Evaluator and the Evaluatee shall discuss areas of agreement and/or disagreement. The Prime Evaluator shall, if appropriate, identify any future objectives for the next school year. C. The Prime Evaluator shall complete the Final Evaluation Summary. The summary shall provide space for the Evaluatee to make comments, or to state disagreement with the Prime Evaluator’s evaluation and/or proposal of future goals/objectives. The Prime Evaluator and the Evaluatee shall meet to sign the Final Evaluation Summary. The Evaluatee’s signature does not indicate agreement with the written summary, but does indicate that the Evaluatee has read it and understands the right to respond in writing. Within ten (10) work days of completing the Final Evaluation Summary, a copy shall be given to the Evaluatee. If the Evaluatee disagrees with the Final Evaluation Summary, the Evaluatee may, within ten (10) work days of receipt, submit a written response which shall be attached to and become a permanent part of the file copy of the Final Evaluation Summary. D. If the Evaluatee does not agree with the evaluation, the Evaluatee has a right to appeal the matter to the Superintendent or his/her designee. (See 10.10) 10.6.5.1 The distribution of the Final Evaluation Summary shall be to each of the following: 10.6.5.2 The Final Evaluation Summary shall be in the hands of the Human Resources Office by June 30 of the evaluation year.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Final Evaluation Summary. Temporary and Probationary unit members shall receive their Final Evaluation Summary by February 15. Permanent unit members shall receive their Final Evaluation Summary not later than thirty (30) calendar days before the end of the school year.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Final Evaluation Summary. 7.7.1 In preparing the final evaluation summary for placement in the unit member’s personnel file, the evaluator shall rely only upon data collected through observations, and pre- and post- evaluation conferences regarding the unit member’s on duty responsibility. Any deficiencies which have been brought to the attention of the unit member, and subsequently corrected, shall not be deemed reason for an unsatisfactory rating in the final evaluation summary. 7.7.2 The unit member shall have the right to initiate a written reaction or response to the evaluation. Such response shall become a permanent attachment to the unit member’s personnel file. Before the end of the school year, a meeting shall be held between the unit member and the evaluator to discuss the evaluation.
View Source

Related to Final Evaluation Summary

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.