Focused Performance Rating Sample Clauses

The Focused Performance Rating clause establishes a specific method for evaluating an individual's or entity's performance based on predetermined, relevant criteria. Typically, this clause outlines the metrics or standards that will be used to assess performance, such as meeting project milestones, achieving sales targets, or adhering to quality benchmarks. By clearly defining how performance will be measured and what constitutes satisfactory or exceptional results, the clause ensures transparency and fairness in evaluations, helping to prevent disputes and align expectations between parties.
Focused Performance Rating. 1. A classroom teacher’s summative score is determined using the most recent comprehensive summative evaluation score. This score becomes the focused summative evaluation score for any of the subsequent years following the comprehensive summative evaluation in which the certificated classroom teacher is paced on a focused evaluation. Should a teacher provide evidence of exemplary practice on the chosen focused criterion, a level 4 (Exemplary) score may be awarded by the evaluator.
Focused Performance Rating. 255 1. A classroom teacher shall receive a Focused Performance Rating of either Proficient (3) or 256 Distinguished (Exemplary) (4) based upon the preponderance of the evidence as it relates 257 to the selected criterion. By definition the Focused Performance Rating is an evaluative 258 statement about the classroom teacher’s Comprehensive Evaluation performance based 259 upon the pre-determined evidence that the classroom teacher has already been deemed 260 Proficient or Distinguished (Exemplary). A classroom teacher on the Focused Evaluation 261 will not be deemed less than Proficient (3). 262 17.7 Performance EvaluationGeneral Provisions.
Focused Performance Rating. 247 1. A classroom teacher shall receive a Focused Performance Rating of either Proficient (3) or 248 Distinguished (Exemplary) (4) based upon the preponderance of the evidence as it relates to the 249 selected criterion. By definition the Focused Performance Rating is an evaluative statement 250 about the classroom teacher’s Comprehensive Evaluation performance based upon the pre- 251 determined evidence that the classroom teacher has already been deemed Proficient or 252 Distinguished (Exemplary). A classroom teacher on the Focused Evaluation will not be deemed 253 less than Proficient (3). 254 17.7 Performance EvaluationGeneral Provisions. 255 17.7.1 Orientation to Evaluation System 256 1. Prior to being evaluated, each classroom teacher shall receive adequate professional 257 development to comprehend the instructional framework and the evaluative rubric and process. 258 The amount and substance of said professional development shall be mutually determined by 259 the Association and the District. 260 2. Prior to the beginning of the evaluation process, a building level group meeting with the 261 evaluator and the employees will take place to explain the procedure to be used in the 262 evaluation process. An explanation shall be given on the procedure to be used in the Districts 263 two evaluation processes: Comprehensive and Focused.

Related to Focused Performance Rating

  • Continuing Performance In the event of a dispute, the Owner and the Developer agree to continue their respective performance hereunder to the extent feasible in light of the dispute, including paying ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and such continuation of efforts and payment of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall not be construed as a waiver of any legal right.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit G), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Excused Performance In case performance of any terms or provisions hereof shall be delayed or prevented because of compliance with any law, decree or order of any governmental agency or authority, whether the same shall be of Local, State or Federal origin, or because of riots, war, public disturbances, strikes, lockouts, differences with workmen, fires, floods, acts of God or any other reason whatsoever which is not within the control of the party whose performance is interfered with and which, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, said party is unable to prevent, the party so suffering may, at its option, suspend, without liability, the performance of its obligations hereunder during the period of such suspension of performance of duties hereunder.

  • OUTCOME IF GRANTEE CANNOT COMPLETE REQUIRED PERFORMANCE Unless otherwise specified in this Statement of Work, if Grantee cannot complete or otherwise comply with a requirement included in this Statement of Work, HHSC, at its sole discretion, may impose remedies or sanctions outlined under Contract Attachment D, Local Mental Health Authority Special Conditions, Section 7.09 (Remedies and Sanctions). CONTRACT NO. HHS001324500038