Formal Written Evaluation Sample Clauses

The Formal Written Evaluation clause requires that assessments or reviews of performance, progress, or compliance be documented in writing. Typically, this clause applies to situations where one party must provide a structured evaluation of another party’s work, such as in employment, service contracts, or academic settings. By mandating a formal, written record, the clause ensures transparency, accountability, and a clear reference point for both parties, helping to prevent misunderstandings and disputes regarding the evaluation process or its outcomes.
Formal Written Evaluation. The following procedure shall be used in preparing a formal written evaluation of an Employee's performance. 8.3.1 The frequency of such formal written evaluations shall be as follows: (a) An Employee who has tenure with the Employer shall be evaluated a minimum of one (1) time each two (2) school terms. (b) A part-time Employee employed to work less than a normal scheduled workday or normal scheduled workweek who has been employed by the Employer for a minimum of three (3) consecutive school terms shall be evaluated a minimum of one (1) time each two (2) school terms. Prior to completing three (3) consecutive school terms, such Employee shall be evaluated a minimum of two (2) times during each school term; provided, however, during the first school term in which such Employee is employed, a minimum of one (1) evaluation under this Section is necessary if such Employee commences employment after January 1 of such school term. (c) A full-time probationary Employee employed to work a normal scheduled workday and normal scheduled workweek for the entire school term shall be evaluated a minimum of two (2) times during each probationary school term; provided, however, during the first school term in which such Employee is employed, a minimum of one (1) evaluation under this Section is necessary if such Employee commences employment after January 1 of such school term. 8.3.2 Each such evaluation shall be preceded by at least one (1) classroom or instructional observation that is in compliance with state law. 8.3.3 A conference shall be held between the Employee and the person making such evaluation following the instructional observation. (a) A copy of the written evaluation will be given to the Employee prior to the conference scheduled under this Section. (b) At the conference the contents of the evaluation, including the performance rating, shall be reviewed and an attempt made to reach mutual agreement on the written evaluation and performance rating. (c) The written evaluation shall be signed by both parties to the evaluation and a copy thereof shall be placed in the Employee’s personnel file, a copy shall be retained by the Employee, and a copy retained by the person making such evaluation. 8.3.4 If mutual agreement is not reached on the evaluation, the Employee may use either or both of the following provisions: (a) Attach written objections to the evaluation. (b) Request in writing that the written evaluation be reviewed jointly by the Superintendent and...
View SourceView Similar (11)
Formal Written Evaluation. In the formal written evaluation, the evaluator shall cite the bargaining unit employee’s specific qualities, abilities, or deficiencies. Any statement concerning the bargaining unit member’s competency from a person other than the evaluator shall be verified by the evaluator prior to inclusion in the written evaluation. Unsubstantiated information will not be used in the evaluation.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Formal Written Evaluation. (Maximum Days) 16-20 Within five (5) working days of the post evaluation conference, the written evaluation form (appearing in this Agreement) and two (2) copies of same will be given to the teacher by the evaluator.
View Source

Related to Formal Written Evaluation

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.