General Justification Sample Clauses

General Justification. The Claimants contend that upon the issuance of Resolution 381, Tele Fácil did all that it could to secure Telmex’s compliance with the provisions of the IFT’s resolution [Resolution 381]”. Hence: • On 9 December 2014, Telmex presented Tele Fácil a “drastically altered version of the agreement that had been ordered by IFT”. (SoC, ¶ 20) • On 10 December 2014, Telmex sent to Tele Fácil a second interconnection agreement (SoC, ¶ 21) • Tele Fácil “immediately follows up by sending Telmex for signature and signed, notarized and certified copy of the interconnection agreement as ordered by the IFT in Resolution 381” (SoC, ¶ 21) • Tele Fácil sought and secured a meeting with the Chief of IFT’s Compliance Unit (SoC, ¶ 22); • Shortly thereafter, a meeting was convened in mid January 2015 in the office of the IFT Chairman to discuss Telmex’s concerns about enforcement of the interconnection agreement between Telmex and Tele Fácil. (SoC, ¶ 23) • “During this period [early 2015], representatives of Tele Fácil met with Telmex several times. Two of these meetings included ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Telmex’s top litigation and regulatory counsel, who was also known to be personal counsel to the Slim family.” (SoC, ¶ 26) The documents sought by the Respondent in this section are relevant to the case and material to its outcome because they will establish: (i) that there was an unresolved disagreement between the operators as to the scope of Resolution 381 and the terms that were to be included in the interconnection agreement pursuant to Resolution 381 –particularly whether it encompassed the interconnection rates that were allegedly agreed upon by the operators– and (ii) that IFT’s interpretation of Resolution 381 (which resulted in Decree 77) was warranted and appropriate in the circumstances.
View Source
General Justification. The parties have agreed that, pursuant to Article 5(2) of the IBA Rules, expert reports shall include inter alia: the “Documents on which the Party-Appointed Expert relies that have not already been submitted shall be provided”. Hence, it is necessary for a party to have the complete set of documents relied on by the other party’s expert, in order to properly evaluate assertions made in the expert report. The requested documents under this section are necessary to properly understand, evaluate and challenge assertions made in the expert report and the Claimants’ assessment of damages. Request No. 8
View Source

Related to General Justification

  • Rationale/Justification The Cisco Certified Network Associate Security (CCNA® Security) certification represents industry acknowledgement of technical skill attainment of competencies in the IT Security program.

  • Justification For fishing of marine fish, prawn, and other aquatic organism, different treatment is given to Myanmar citizens according to the provisions of the Myanma Marine Fisheries Law (1990)

  • Contractor Selection Justification Form Customers shall complete this Contractor Selection Justification Form for each candidate selected and attach all completed forms to the purchase order. Date: Contractor’s Name: _ Contractor’s Contact Information: Address: _ Phone: _ Email: Candidate’s Name: _ Date Candidate will be available: _ Hourly rate of candidate: $ Position candidate recommended for: _ Justification for selection of candidate: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Agency: Division/Section/Unit: _ Printed Name: _ Title: _ Signature _ Date: Contractor's Name: Quarter: Purchase Order (PO) Number: PO Total $ Amount: PO Starting Date Ending Date Please review the attached Rating Definitions and provide your opinion by rating the following:

  • Non-Discrimination Statement and Certification This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. In accordance with Federal civil rights law, all U.S. Departments, including but not limited to the USDA, USDE, FEMA, are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by federal funds (not all bases apply to all programs). Vendor certifies that Vendor will comply with applicable Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity provisions set forth in TIPS Member Customers’ policies and other regulations at the local, state, and federal levels of governments. Yes, I certify

  • Sick Leave Verification Process a. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee receives confirmation of employment in the school district. b. An employee must initiate the sick leave verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of commencing employment with the new school district. c. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the sick leave credits which the employee seeks to port.