Guidance and evaluation Clause Samples

The 'Guidance and evaluation' clause establishes the framework for providing direction and assessing performance or progress within an agreement or project. Typically, this clause outlines the methods by which one party may offer feedback, set benchmarks, or review deliverables to ensure they meet agreed-upon standards. For example, it may specify regular review meetings, written evaluations, or criteria for measuring success. Its core practical function is to ensure ongoing oversight and quality control, helping to identify issues early and maintain alignment with objectives.
Guidance and evaluation. Utrecht University (or the relevant study unit or Faculty) shall designate an academic supervisor to take responsibility for the internship and the organisation offering the internship shall designate an internship supervisor. If any problems arise, the internship supervisor shall contact the academic supervisor. At the end of the internship, Utrecht University will require the student intern to submit a report, the specifications for which will be made available to the student before the internship starts. The organisation offering the internship will receive a copy of this report. The organisation offering the internship will provide the student intern with an evaluation of his or her internship, as well as written confirmation that the work programme took place and was completed.
Guidance and evaluation. The GSNS shall designate a project supervisor to take responsibility for the work placement and the placement provider shall designate a daily supervisor. If any problems arise, the daily supervisor shall contact the project supervisor. The work placement provider will provide the student-trainee with qualitatively and quantitively adequate supervision to enable the student trainee to acquire the learning objectives. At the end of the work placement, the GSNS will require the student-trainee to submit a report, the specifications for which will be made available to the student-trainee before the work placement starts. The placement provider will receive a copy of this report. The work placement provider will provide the student-trainee with an evaluation of his or her work placement, as well as written confirmation that the work programme took place and was completed.
Guidance and evaluation. 1. Utrecht University, Faculty of Humanities shall designate an supervising lecturer to take responsibility for the internship. The organisation offering the internship shall designate an internship supervisor for the day-to-day supervision of the intern. If problems arise that cannot be resolved jointly by the intern and supervisor, the supervisor will contact the supervising lecturer. 2. At the end of the internship, Utrecht University will receive an internship report from the intern, the requirements of which will be available to the student before the internship begins. The internship organisation may be offered a copy of this report. 3. The host organisation will provide the intern with an evaluation of the internship.
Guidance and evaluation. The student is responsible for finding an UU examiner. The organisation offering the internship shall designate an internship supervisor. If any problems arise, the internship supervisor shall contact the examiner. The student shall confidentially discuss the content and context of the internship with the examiner. The examiner shall advise and determine whether the quality of the internship in terms of scientific content and learning outcomes meets the required standards of UU. • At the end of the internship, Utrecht University requires the student to submit a report describing the learning outcomes and ‘proof’ that the research cycle was fulfilled at least once. The report contains at least the following information: abstract, introduction, results, material and methods, discussion and conclusion and literature references. The host organisation will receive a copy of this report. • The host organisation will provide the student with an evaluation of his or her internship, as well as written confirmation that the work programme took place and was completed, according to the requirements of Utrecht University. This is fulfilled by filling-in the required assessment form and rubric(s). The student will provide the supervisor of the host organisation the required documents and the supervisor of the host organisation will send these to the course coordinators and examiner upon completion of the internship.1

Related to Guidance and evaluation

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.