Impact Indicators Sample Clauses
The 'Impact indicators' clause defines the metrics or criteria used to measure the effectiveness or outcomes of a project, program, or agreement. Typically, this clause outlines specific quantitative or qualitative indicators, such as increased sales, reduced emissions, or improved customer satisfaction, that will be tracked over a set period. By establishing clear benchmarks for success, the clause ensures all parties have a shared understanding of what constitutes meaningful progress and provides a basis for evaluating performance and accountability.
Impact Indicators. 1. The number of deaths of pregnant women has dropped from 528 per 100,000 in 2005 to 200 per 100,000 in 2011.
2. The number of deaths of children under a year old has dropped from 88 per 1,000 in 2005 to 50 per 1,000 in 2011.
Impact Indicators. “Team-network has better understanding of the methodology used to provide comprehensive psychological support” “Further strengthening of the team-network”
Impact Indicators. “Continuous improvement of the methodology for providing comprehensive psychological support to victims of torture” “Further development of important aspects of the methodology”
Impact Indicators. Specialized professionals with improved skills for comprehensive psychological care of torture victims in the Inter-American System. A growing pool of methodological experience among specialized professionals on the team-network. A consolidated regional network of specialists and organizations able to provide support for torture victims.
Impact Indicators. Increase in the number of torture cases coming before the bodies of the Inter-American System.
Impact Indicators. “Improvement in the quality of the psychological support provided to victims of torture with hearings before the bodies of the Inter-American System” The work with these two new cases taught very important lessons that will enrich project methods for comprehensive psychological care of victims and for documenting these practices. The most significant lesson is the importance of adopting a flexible approach to assigning specialists, based on the particular needs of each case. Because of this flexibility, the project successfully met its basic objectives of high-quality care for victims and an effective legal strategy for advocacy with the bodies of the System. The flexible approach proved to be an innovative, educational experience. Both in the hearings and in personal communications, the victims recognized how important it was for themselves and their families to have appealed to the Inter-American System and stressed that their appearance and their cases in general would have important implications for their societies. • A press release from the Court, dated June 25th 2004, reporting that hearings on the case Tibi vs. Ecuador had been set for July 7th and 8th , 2004 • A press release from the Court, issued on October 1st , 2004, reporting that public hearings had been held on the case ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sisters vs. El Salvador • An evaluation interview with the mother of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇'▇ daughters (▇▇▇▇ vs. Ecuador)
3.3. Litigation of torture cases before the Inter-American System
Impact Indicators. “More people are knowledgeable about the psychological impact of torture and the methodologies used to provide support” The distribution of the Gazette should bring about a substantial increase in the number of people informed about the project and will spread knowledge about the innovative issues addressed in the text. • A copy of the specialized Gazette • Vouchers for distribution of the specialized Gazette
Impact Indicators. Progress in the design of a methodology for the integral psychological attention to victims of torture or their families. Increase in the amount of documents on specialized topics dealing with attention to victims of torture in the inter-American system.
Impact Indicators. “More cases of torture brought before the bodies of the Inter-American System” “The issue has a higher profile within the Inter-American System”
Impact Indicators. For purposes of tracking the long-term impact of the prevention projects original and newly implemented in the selected cities as identified in Section V.Subparagraphs D. and V.E. above, CONTRACTOR shall obtain data as reported in the Orange County – each Fourth Quarter/ district level data for school year 2011-2012, California Healthy Kids Survey, indicators and include this data in the Year-End Report: on the following impact
1. Perceived difficulty of obtaining alcohol, grades 9 and ll; and
2. Prevalence of current alcohol use (past 30 days), grades 9 and 11. HK. CONTRACTOR and ADMINISTRATOR may mutually agree in writing to modify the due measures, performance dates and quantities identified within the performance performance measuressupporting activities described in subparagraphs Period Two, a preliminary Action Plan by July 31, 2013 and a final Action Plan by August 16, 2013. 17, 2012; and for and a final Action Plan by August 19, 2011. The Period One I. above.