IN MOTION Sample Clauses

The "IN MOTION" clause typically defines the conditions under which certain actions, processes, or obligations are considered to be actively underway within the context of an agreement. In practice, this clause might specify that a project, delivery, or legal process is officially recognized as started once specific criteria are met, such as the commencement of work or the filing of necessary documents. Its core function is to provide clarity on when responsibilities or timelines begin, thereby reducing ambiguity and potential disputes about the status of ongoing activities.
IN MOTION. It was the fall of 2019 when the provincial negotiations with the Québec Government took off, with the filing of the union demands. It took 18 months of intense negotiations in a pandemic context and major mobilization to reach a global tentative agreement ratified by the members on August 5, 2021. For the first time, the FIQ and FIQP nurse, licensed practical nurse, respiratory therapist and clinical perfusionist members voted electronically on their working conditions. Writing the texts, which took place up to the signature of the collective agreement on October 7, 2021, was carried out very quickly, so the members could benefit from the gains in this new work contract as soon as possible. Hence, this collect- ive agreement is the result of a long-term effort spanning more than 30 months, between the first consultations of the members and union reps to the application of this collective agreement. The comments otained at the beginning of 2019 for developing the union demands painted a somber portrait of the healthcare professionals’ daily working conditions: work overload, mandatory overtime and mental exhaustion were widespread. There was an urgent need to act to restore the healthcare professionals physical and mental health. The large electronic consultation the following summer, on the solutions to pro- ▇▇▇▇ for improving working conditions, pointed to the stabilization of work teams, reduction of workloads, elimination of mandatory overtime and real family-work- study balance. Getting paid and contributing to their pension at the level of a full- time position, while maintaining flexibility to balance their personal and profes- sional lives, was what healthcare professionals wanted. Two priorities and five objectives formed the core of the negotiation draft, fueled by multiple solutions identified by the FIQ and FIQP members. These are the solutions that were hammered home to a government that took advantage of the health emergency that started in March 2020 to trample on the rights of healthcare professionals with ministerial orders. While the health network was facing the largest pandemic crisis in its history, the FIQ and FIQP obtained a negotiated agreement which will profoundly change the damaging management culture of recent years based on flexibility, by imple- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ a culture of stability of positions and work teams. The 2021-2023 collective agreement will help with better work and personal life balance. It lays the foundations for combati...
View SourceView Similar (4)
IN MOTION. If, and only if, the vehicle is being driven by a team, the non-driver may operate the MCT while the vehicle is in motion, provided the non-driver ensures such operation does not distract the driver.
View SourceView Similar (3)
IN MOTION. Lessee shall furnish to Lessor certificates of insurance, with evidence that Hull and Liability insurance policies name Lessors as “Owner/Lessor”: as “Loss Payee” for Aircraft Physical Damage Coverage there under: Lessor’s lien holder, must be provided “Breach of Warranty “coverage, in this case ...............................................................................................................
View Source

Related to IN MOTION

  • Motion On a date mutually acceptable to the Parties that is not more than ninety (90) days from the Agreement Date, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, via e-mail or otherwise, Plaintiffs shall submit to the Court a motion requesting entry of an order substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F (the “Scheduling Order”) (a) preliminarily approving the Settlement; (b) approving the content and plan for publication and dissemination of Notice; (c) setting the date by which any objection to the Settlement or this Agreement must be filed; and (d) scheduling a Hearing to consider final approval of the Settlement and entry of the orders required by Paragraph 20 of this Agreement. With respect to the content and plan for publication and dissemination of Notice, Plaintiffs will propose that Notice in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, be sent via electronic mail, first-class mail or international delivery service to all Interested Parties; sent via electronic service to all counsel of record for any Person who is, at the time of Notice, a party in any case included in In re Stanford Entities Securities Litigation, MDL No. 2099 (N.D. Tex.) (the “MDL”), including but not limited to the parties to the ARCA Investments Litigation, the SEC Action, or the Litigation who are deemed to have consented to electronic service through the Court’s CM/ECF System under Local Rule CV- 5.1(d); sent via facsimile transmission and/or first class mail to any other counsel of record for any other Person who is, at the time of service, a party in any case included in the MDL, the SEC Action, or the Litigation; and posted on the websites of the Receiver and the Examiner along with complete copies of this Agreement and all filings with the Court relating to the Settlement, this Agreement, and approval of the Settlement. Plaintiffs will further propose that Notice in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G be published once in the national edition of The Wall Street Journal and once in the international edition of The New York Times. In advance of filing the motion papers to accomplish the foregoing, Plaintiffs shall provide Proskauer with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such motion papers.

  • Civil Action except where a joint Union-Employer Committee considers that there has been flagrant or wilful negligence on the part of an employee, the Employer agrees not to seek indemnity against an employee whose actions result in a judgement against the Employer. The Employer agrees to pay any judgement against an employee arising out of the performance of his/her duties. The Employer also agrees to pay any legal costs incurred in the proceedings including those of the employee.

  • Filing of Motions Until the Discharge of First-Lien Obligations has occurred, each Junior-Lien Authorized Representative and each Junior-Lien Collateral Agent agrees on behalf of itself and the other Junior-Lien Secured Parties that no Junior-Lien Secured Party shall, in or in connection with any Insolvency or Liquidation Proceeding, file any pleadings or motions, take any position at any hearing or proceeding of any nature, join with or support any other Person doing so, or otherwise take any action whatsoever, including without limitation any such action that (a) violates, or is prohibited by, this Article VI (or, in the absence of an Insolvency or Liquidation Proceeding, otherwise would violate or be prohibited by this Agreement), (b) asserts any right, benefit or privilege that arises in favor of the Junior-Lien Authorized Representative, the Junior-Lien Collateral Agents or Junior-Lien Secured Parties, in whole or in part, as a result of their interest in the Shared Collateral (unless the assertion of such right is expressly permitted by this Agreement) or (c) challenges the validity, priority, enforceability or voidability of any Liens or claims held by any First-Lien Collateral Agent or any other First-Lien Secured Party with respect to the Shared Collateral, or the extent to which the First-Lien Obligations constitute secured claims or the value thereof under Section 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise; provided that the Designated Junior-Lien Authorized Representative or the Designated Junior-Lien Collateral Agent may (i) file a proof of claim in an Insolvency or Liquidation Proceeding and (ii) file any necessary responsive or defensive pleadings in opposition of any motion or other pleadings made by any Person objecting to or otherwise seeking the disallowance of the claims of the Junior-Lien Secured Parties on the Shared Collateral, subject to the limitations contained in this Agreement and only if consistent with the terms and the limitations on the Junior-Lien Authorized Representatives and Junior-Lien Collateral Agents imposed hereby.

  • Dismissal of Litigation Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Summit, VISX and Pillar Point shall cause all of the Summit/VISX Litigation (as hereinafter defined) to be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. As used herein, "Summit/VISX Litigation" means VISX Partner, Inc. v. Summit Partner, Inc., Sant▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Court, Case No. CV 772057; VISX, Incorporated v. Pillar Point Partners, et al., Sant▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Court, Case No. 770042; and VISX Partner, Inc., on behalf Pillar Point Partners, United States District Court, District Of Massachusetts, Case No. 96-11739-PBS. The term "Summit/VISX Litigation" includes all counterclaims, cross-claims and the like asserted in the foregoing actions.

  • Reconsideration If We did not attempt to consult with Your Provider who recommended the Covered Service before making an adverse determination, the Provider may request reconsideration by the same clinical peer reviewer who made the adverse determination or a designated clinical peer reviewer if the original clinical peer reviewer is unavailable. For Preauthorization and concurrent reviews, the reconsideration will take place within one (1) business day of the request for reconsideration. If the adverse determination is upheld, a notice of adverse determination will be given to You and Your Provider, by telephone and in writing.