Indirect Effects Sample Clauses
The Indirect Effects clause defines the extent to which a party is liable for damages that are not a direct result of a breach, but arise as a secondary consequence. In practice, this clause typically limits or excludes responsibility for losses such as lost profits, loss of business opportunities, or reputational harm that occur due to the breach but are not the immediate result of it. Its core function is to allocate risk between the parties by clarifying which types of consequential damages are recoverable, thereby reducing uncertainty and potential for excessive liability.
Indirect Effects. Indirect effects to historic properties are those caused by an Undertaking that are later in time or farther removed in distance but are still reasonably foreseeable.
Indirect Effects. The potential indirect economic effects of construction activities are estimated using an input-output (I-O) model of the Ketchikan Gateway Borough economy, available from the Minnesota IMPLAN6 Group. The company uses a large number of data sources to construct economic models of the economy of each state, county, or borough in the U.S. The I-O model captures the inter-industry transactions generated by the construction firms and their suppliers and the additional economic activity generated by household and government spending that will result construction of an alternative. When money enters an economy, it affects more than the initial recipient. When a bridge or road is built in Alaska, construction firms are the direct beneficiaries. The construction firms, in turn, buy supplies from other Alaska firms and hire workers. The shops selling the supplies make additional purchases, as do the project workers. A large share of local purchases may also be transferred out of the local economy by out-of-state purchases. The money spent locally on the project flows through the economy until it is dissipated by these out-of-region purchases. This is often called the multiplier effect. The effects of purchases from suppliers outside the state are excluded from the estimates. I-O 6 Impact analysis for planning models do not indicate the period of time when the effects of the initial spending will be felt throughout the economy. Because subsequent rounds of spending may be spread out over several years, the total effect suggested by the I-O models may not be realized in the initial year. The money that goes directly to the construction firms is part of the direct effect of the construction activities. Those effects are provided in the previous section. The additional rounds of spending caused by construction firm expenditures are part of the subsequent indirect and induced effects, which are often collectively referred to as secondary effects. It is typical that much of the secondary effect from any project occurs through expenditures by households and the government. The data shown in Sections 0 through 0 were estimated using the Ketchikan Gateway Borough I-O model.
Indirect Effects a. The APE for indirect effects on historic properties will include, but not be limited to, the visual, audible and atmospheric elements that could adversely affect NRHP listed or eligible properties. Consideration will be given to all qualifying characteristics of a historic property, including those that may have been identified subsequent to the original evaluation of the property’s eligibility for the NRHP.
b. The indirect effects APE for the Undertaking will extend generally for five miles or to the visual horizon, whichever is closer, on either side of the centerline of the proposed alignment and alternative routes.
c. Studies for previous 500 kV lines have identified noise created by corona and electromagnetic fields as possible indirect effects for transmission lines. These same studies indicate that these effects are greatest immediately under the line and within the APE for direct effects. Although they may on occasion be measured as far as 300 feet from the centerline of a 500 kV line, data gathered for this Undertaking indicate that the noise created by corona and electromagnetic fields will be limited to within the inventoried indirect effects APE.
d. Where the indirect APE includes TCPs, NHTs, and other classes of visually-sensitive historic properties, additional analyses may be required and the indirect APE may need to be modified accordingly. These areas will require analysis on a case by case basis.
Indirect Effects. The APE for indirect effects, or Indirect APE, includes areas outside the construction or ground disturbance ROW where there is the potential for the Undertaking to have an indirect effect, including visual, vibration and noise effects, on historic properties, as defined in 36 C.F.R § 800.5. Tribal sites of significance located outside the Direct APE, including water resources, sacred and ceremonial sites, areas where traditional plants are located, and associated features, will be considered for inclusion in the APE for indirect effects. If a build alternative is approved, the STB, will consult with the MT SHPO, tribes, TRRC and other consulting parties to establish the Indirect APE.
Indirect Effects i. The treaty had critical effect on Nepal's sovereignty. For example, the British would take the final decision, if there were any conflict between Sikkim and Nepal.
ii. It brought dishonour to the sacrifices made by ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, bravery of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, and the diplomacy of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ for the campaign of unification of Nepal.
iii. It sowed the seed of discord between the senior officials and rulers in Nepal. There was one group, which still favoured war with British to take back the territories as Nepal was forced to cede. While another group did not want the war to continue. This conflict averted another war against the British.
iv. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, who had vehemently opposed the Sugauli Treaty that cost Nepal one-third of its territory, sought recluse to Gosainkunda away from the battlefield and he breathed last there.
Indirect Effects a. The APE for indirect effects on historic properties considers visual, audible, and atmospheric elements that could diminish the integrity of properties for which setting, feeling, and/or association are qualifying characteristics of NRHP eligibility. The indirect APE for the Undertaking extends to the visual horizon or for 3 miles on either side of the transmission line centerline, whichever is closer.
b. Where the APE for indirect effects includes traditional cultural properties (TCPs), properties of traditional religious and cultural importance, National Historic Landmarks (NHL), NHTs, and other classes of historic properties for which setting, feeling and/or association contributes to eligibility, additional analyses may be required and the indirect APE may be modified accordingly following procedures at I.B below.
Indirect Effects. There are a number of potential indirect effects from construction of a bridge or the expansion of ferry service. The effects addressed in this study are the effects of construction and operations expenditures on the local economy, the effects of the low clearance bridges on cruise-related spending, and the overall effects on regional economic development.
Indirect Effects. The APE for indirect effects shall be areas visible and within 5 miles of any project component (including conductors and access roads) or to the visual horizon, whichever is closer, or where consultation identifies a need to expand this APE in certain locations.
a. BLM will use a Geographic Information System (GIS) view shed analysis to identify areas in the indirect effects APE from which the Undertaking may be visible.
b. The indirect effects APE may extend beyond the 5-mile convention to encompass properties that have traditional religious and cultural importance, including traditional cultural properties (TCPs), or other geographically extensive historic properties such as trails, when effects have been determined to extend beyond this distance.
Indirect Effects. A. Please choose and check the item(s) which are dealt with this Article by you. Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned
Indirect Effects. The indirect APE will vary based on the presence of cultural resources identified during project review, inventory, or through consultation. In defining the indirect APE, BLM will consider visual, audible, and atmospheric elements introduced as a result of the Undertaking that could diminish the integrity of historic properties for which setting, feeling, and/or association are aspects of such integrity.
a. The baseline indirect APE for the Undertaking extends to the visual horizon, not to exceed 1 mile on either side of the direct APE, unless otherwise identified by a Consulting Party in consultation or as identified through additional analysis.
b. When the indirect APE includes traditional cultural properties (TCPs), rural historic landscapes (RHLs), properties of traditional religious and cultural significance, National Historic Landmarks (NHL), National Historic Trails (NHT), or other classes of historic properties for which setting, feeling, and/or association contribute to eligibility, additional analysis may be required and the indirect APE may be modified accordingly following the procedures outline at Stipulation II.B below. These areas will require analysis on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the Consulting Parties.