Initial Evaluations Clause Samples

The Initial Evaluations clause establishes the requirement for an early assessment or review of certain aspects of a contract, project, or service. Typically, this clause outlines the timing, scope, and criteria for the initial evaluation, such as reviewing deliverables, performance, or compliance with agreed standards shortly after commencement. By setting clear expectations for an early review, the clause helps identify issues or deficiencies at the outset, allowing parties to address problems promptly and ensuring the project or agreement starts on a solid foundation.
Initial Evaluations. For professional employees, program staff and clerical employees, written evaluations shall be prepared at the mid-point and the end of the probationary period and at least annually thereafter and more frequently as determined by the Agency. For hourly employees, written evaluations shall be prepared at the end of the probationary period and at least annually thereafter and more frequently as determined by the Agency. If the probationary period is extended, another evaluation shall be submitted at the end of the stipulated extended probationary period. If an employee has not been evaluated on a timely basis, then upon employee’s request an evaluation shall take place not later than thirty (30) days of the request.
Initial Evaluations. Prior to the commencement of Project construction and before delivery of materials and equipment to the Project Area, the Developer shall, at its own expense, hire a qualified independent engineer (“Qualified Engineer”) to inspect and structurally assess all Designated Roads and to provide a report (the “Initial Evaluation”). An enumeration of each Initial Evaluation for the Designated Roads shall be included as ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇-▇ of this Road Use and Repair Agreement. The Initial Evaluation shall include or address the following: i. The Qualified Engineer shall determine if the Designated Roads have the structural capacity to carry the loads generated by the Developer Parties. ii. If the Qualified Engineer determines that the Designated Roads are insufficient to carry the loads generated by the Developer Parties, the Qualified Engineer shall provide a recommendation to the Developer and the County as to how the Designated Roads will be made sufficient. All cost associated with making the Designated Roads sufficient for the Developer Parties shall be the responsibility of the Developer. iii. In consultation with the County Engineer, the Qualified Engineer shall determine the number of ESALs generated by the Developer Parties for each segment of Designated Road. iv. For Designated Roads that are paved, the Qualified Engineer shall determine the road life consumed by the Developer Parties. The Qualified Engineer shall compare the ESALs generated by the Developer Parties to the 20 year design ESALs of the paved Designated Road. The Qualified Engineer shall compute the required Granular Equivalency (“GE”) for the paved Designated Road with and without the Developer Parties ESAL. v. If the additional ESALs generated by the Developer Parties increase the required GE for the paved Designated Road, it shall be the responsibility of the Developer to make sure the paved Designated Road meets or exceeds the required GE prior to construction or reimburse the County for the cost of the GE prior to construction as set forth in the Master Permit Schedule (Exhibit C of the Development Agreement). vi. The reimbursement rate shall be $5,200 per 0.1 inch per mile for paved Designated Roads.
Initial Evaluations. At least one month prior to the conclusion of a new Employee's provisional period (initial 180 days of employment), the Employee shall be evaluated in written form by their supervisor. This evaluation shall be prepared no later than thirty (30) days following the Employee's completion of their provisional period. The supervisor shall present a draft of the supervisors evaluation to the designated Employee and meet with that Employee, not before the passing of two (2) days and no later than five (5) working days, to discuss the draft evaluation fully with the Employee. Following this meeting the supervisor will present the final copy of the evaluation, which the Employee will sign. If they choose, the Employee may prepare a written response if in disagreement. Such a response will be placed in the Employee’s personnel file attached to their supervisor’s evaluation.
Initial Evaluations. (1) The JJAEP will assist School District that is responsible for all Child Find obligations; (2) The JJAEP will establish a Core Team for the purpose of reviewing student progress, identifying pre-referral educational interventions, reviewing the success of those interventions, and referring to School District for a Full and Individual Initial Evaluation (FIIE) those students for whom pre-referral interventions were insufficient; (3) The School District may assign a representative to the JJAEP Core Team; (4) The JJAEP will complete necessary referral documentation prior to notifying School District that a student may be in need of evaluation under IDEA; (5) Upon the Core Team's recommendation that a JJAEP student may be in need of special education services, the School District is responsible for ensuring FIE timeline.
Initial Evaluations. At least one month prior to the conclusion of a new Employee's provisional period (initial 180 days of employment), the Employee shall be evaluated in written form by their supervisor. This evaluation shall be prepared no later than thirty (30) days following the Employee's completion of their provisional period. The supervisor shall present a draft of the supervisors evaluation to the designated Employee and meet with that Employee, not before the passing of two (2) days and no later
Initial Evaluations. Developer shall conduct an Initial Evaluation of Designated Roads prior to commencement of construction of the Project or any Improvements to establish the Initial Condition of such Designated Roads. Developer shall provide such Initial Evaluation to the Town and County; if the Town or County, as appropriate, do not give written notice of any objection to the completeness and accuracy of the Initial Evaluation within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt, the Initial Evaluation shall be deemed accepted by the Town and/or County. If, pursuant to Section 2.2, Developer submits to the Town and County an updated version of

Related to Initial Evaluations

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.