Common use of Initial Review Clause in Contracts

Initial Review. In departmentalized faculties, the initial reviewer shall be the department head or equivalent. For units other than academic departments, the ▇▇▇▇, after consultation in committee with the relevant academic staff members, shall determine who is to be the initial reviewer. Members in the unit shall be informed in writing, before the beginning of the period under review, of the identity of the initial reviewer. The ▇▇▇▇, after consultation in committee with the department heads or equivalents in that Faculty or equivalent unit, shall choose the initial reviewer(s) for heads, and inform the heads of their choice(s) no later than September 30th. The initial review shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the academic unit and entered on the form over the signature of the initial reviewer. When the initial reviewer has made a recommendation, it shall be communicated in writing to the academic staff member. The initial reviewer shall discuss the recommendation with the academic staff member. Upon request by the member, the initial reviewer shall provide a copy of the Performance Review Form, including the recommendation, to the member. The academic staff member shall sign the Performance Review Form indicating that the member has read the Form. The member’s signature does not necessarily indicate that the member is in agreement with the statements on the Form. Academic staff members may add clarifying information after they have signed the Performance Review Form. This information shall be provided to the ▇▇▇▇ no later than one week after the member has signed the Performance Review Form. The ▇▇▇▇ shall attach this information to the Performance Review Form before it is forwarded to the Review Committee. The initial review shall not be forwarded to the Review Committee until all the above steps have been completed.

Initial Review. In departmentalized faculties, the initial reviewer shall be the department head or equivalent. For units other than academic departments, the ▇▇▇▇▇ or equivalent, after consultation in committee with the relevant academic staff members, shall determine who is to be the initial reviewer. Members in the unit shall be informed in writing, before the beginning of the period under review, of the identity of the initial reviewer. The ▇▇▇▇▇ or equivalent, after consultation in committee with the department heads or equivalents in that Faculty or equivalent unit, shall choose the initial reviewer(s) for heads, and inform the heads of their choice(s) no later than September 30th. The initial review shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the academic unit and entered on the form over the signature of the initial reviewer. When the initial reviewer has made a recommendation, it shall be communicated in writing to the academic staff member. The initial reviewer shall discuss the recommendation with the academic staff member. Upon request by the member, the initial reviewer shall provide a copy of the Performance Review Form, including the recommendation, to the member. The academic staff member shall sign the Performance Review Form indicating that the member has read the Form. The member’s signature does not necessarily indicate that the member is in agreement with the statements on the Form. Academic staff members may add clarifying information after they have signed the Performance Review Form. This information shall be provided to the ▇▇▇▇ or equivalent as soon as possible and no later than one week after the member has signed the Performance Review Form. The ▇▇▇▇ shall attach this information to the Performance Review Form before it is forwarded to the Review Committee. The initial review shall not be forwarded to the Review Committee until all the above steps have been completed.