Instead Sample Clauses
The "Instead" clause serves to specify an alternative action, obligation, or provision that replaces a previously stated term or requirement within a contract. In practice, this clause is used to clarify that, rather than following the original stipulation, a different process or condition will apply; for example, it might state that a party will provide a refund instead of a replacement product. Its core practical function is to ensure clarity and prevent confusion by explicitly outlining when and how a substitution or deviation from the standard terms is permitted or required.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Instead. Polaris filed a Full Report on the MY 14 Rangers with the Commission, under 15 U.S.C. § 2064(b), on July 12, 2016.
Instead. Polaris filed a Full Report on MY 15 Ranger 900s in March 2017, when the number of heat shield incidents on Rangers had reached 10, including five reports of fires. Polaris and CPSC jointly announced a recall of the MY 15 Rangers on April 13, 2017.
Instead. Polaris filed a Full Report concerning the fire risk associated with MY 2014 to MY 2016 RZRs on February 19, 2016. By that time, Polaris reported that it had received reports of 150 fires on MY 14-MY 16 RZRs that had resulted in the death of a 15-year- old passenger from a rollover that resulted in a fire, 11 reports of burn injuries, and a fire that burned ten acres of land.
Instead. BellSouth agrees to offer the Universal Digital Channel (UDC), which may also be referred to as an IDSL-capable loop as a part of its Unbundled Digital Loop offerings. The UDC loop is intended to be compatible with IDSL service and has the same physical characteristics and transmission specifications as BellSouth’s ISDN-capable loop. These specifications are listed in BellSouth’s TR73600.
Instead. ‘The danger is the lack of understanding (murikai) and intemperance (musessei)’ (WTZ XX: 344, emphasis in the original) in addition to the fact that the isms (shugi) are often subjected to radicalization (WTZ XX: 347). Watsuji is bringing Great Britain as an example of a democratic system with a monarchy. Nonetheless, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ also argues that Japan and Britain are not the same case study. For example, the Japanese Imperial family is of an unbroken descent (bansei ikkei) that realizes its unique history in the spirit of the Japanese democracy (WTZ XX: 344). On a more political level, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ argues that the suffrage, even as a difficult concept to understand, has to be awarded to the people. Furthermore, the reforms of the capitalist and the union systems have to be put forward together with a massive campaign of education focussed on the welfare of ‘public life’ (kōkyō seikatsu) that would prevent society from retreating back to ‘egotism’ (rikoshugi) (WTZ XX: 348-9). Surprisingly, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ thinks that the conservatives pose a real threat because their refusal of accepting political and social reforms could cause ‘explosions’ (bakuhatsu) and ‘riots’ (konran). This is the reason why they should be banned (tsuibō serarenebanaranu) (WTZ XX: 349). As it is possible to see here, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ is not opposing the implementation of European- style democratic reforms in Japan. He is stressing the fact that ‘educating’ the masses could be a valuable solution for the imperial family to safeguard the kokutai and to prevent a violent revolution. This represents another characteristic of the Taishō period, when intellectuals were engaging in a debate with the masses over the role of socialism and democratic rights.
Instead the Accreted Value of each Note will increase (representing amortization of original issue discount) between the date of original issuance and April 15, 2009 at a rate of 14 3/4% calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis using a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months (as more fully set forth in the Indenture), such that the Accreted Value on April 15, 2009 will be equal to the full principal amount at maturity of the Notes. Beginning on the Full Accretion Date, cash interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of 14 3/4% per annum and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, or if any such day is not a Business Day, on the next succeeding Business Day (each, an "Interest Payment Date"). Interest on the Notes will accrue from the most recent date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from April 15, 2009; provided that if there is no existing Default in the payment of interest, and if this Note is authenticated between a record date referred to on the face hereof and the next succeeding Interest Payment Date, interest shall accrue from such next succeeding Interest Payment Date; provided, further, that the first Interest Payment Date shall be October 15, 2009. The Company will pay interest (including post-petition interest in any proceeding under any Bankruptcy Law) on overdue principal and premium, if any, from time to time on demand at a rate that is 1% per annum in excess of the rate then in effect to the extent lawful; it will pay interest (including post-petition interest in any proceeding under any Bankruptcy Law) on overdue installments of interest and Additional Interest, if any, (without regard to any applicable grace periods) from time to time on demand at the same rate to the extent lawful. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months.
Instead. 82 As occupation is not allowed until Substantial Completion, this clause provides further assurance that the Lessee will complete construction of the Improvements, which reduces the risk of accidents arising from people being in unsafe or hazardous Improvements.